IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11848-d1208553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Role of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the Construction Industry Using a Delphi-ANP-TOPSIS Hybrid MCDM Concept under a Fuzzy Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Wang

    (Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Linyi 273400, China)

  • Ziyi Ying

    (College of Architecture and Energy Engineering, Wenzhou University of Technology, Wenzhou 325055, China
    Taishun Research Institute, Wenzhou University of Technology, Wenzhou 325599, China)

  • Shankha Shubhra Goswami

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Sarang 759146, India)

  • Yongsheng Yin

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Yafei Zhao

    (Solearth Architecture Research Center, Building Information Technology Innovation Laboratory (BITI Lab.), Hong Kong 999077, China)

Abstract

The construction business is always changing, and with the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) technology it is undergoing substantial modifications in a variety of areas. The purpose of this research paper is to investigate the function of AI tools in the construction industry using a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework based on the Delphi method, analytic network process (ANP), and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) under a fuzzy scenario. The ANP framework offers a systematic approach to quantifying the relative importance of AI technologies based on expert opinions gathered during the Delphi process, whereas the fuzzy TOPSIS methodology is used to rank and select the most appropriate AI technologies for the construction industry. The final results from the ANP revealed that the technological factors are the most crucial, followed by the environmental factors, which highly influence the AI environment. In addition, TOPSIS identified robotics and automation as the best AI alternative among the three options, followed by building information modeling (BIM), whereas computer vision was the least preferred among the list. The proposed hybrid MCDM framework enables a comprehensive evaluation and selection process that takes into account the interdependencies between AI technologies and uncertainties in decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Wang & Ziyi Ying & Shankha Shubhra Goswami & Yongsheng Yin & Yafei Zhao, 2023. "Investigating the Role of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the Construction Industry Using a Delphi-ANP-TOPSIS Hybrid MCDM Concept under a Fuzzy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-42, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11848-:d:1208553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11848/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11848/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zaher Mundher Yaseen & Zainab Hasan Ali & Sinan Q. Salih & Nadhir Al-Ansari, 2020. "Prediction of Risk Delay in Construction Projects Using a Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Janusz Kulejewski & Jerzy Rosłon, 2023. "Optimization of Ecological and Economic Aspects of the Construction Schedule with the Use of Metaheuristic Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Mohd. Ahmed & Saeed AlQadhi & Javed Mallick & Nabil Ben Kahla & Hoang Anh Le & Chander Kumar Singh & Hoang Thi Hang, 2022. "Artificial Neural Networks for Sustainable Development of the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Shankha Shubhra Goswami & Dhiren Kumar Behera, 2021. "An Analysis for Selecting Best Smartphone Model by AHP-TOPSIS Decision-Making Methodology," International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 116-137, May.
    5. Sen-Kuei Liao & Hsiao-Yin Hsu & Kuei-Lun Chang, 2018. "A Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Selecting the Location of Women’s Fitness Centers," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, December.
    6. Pengzhen Lu & Shengyong Chen & Yujun Zheng, 2012. "Artificial Intelligence in Civil Engineering," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-22, December.
    7. Mahmood Shafiee, 2022. "Wind Energy Development Site Selection Using an Integrated Fuzzy ANP-TOPSIS Decision Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Ke Wang & Yafei Zhao & Rajan Kumar Gangadhari & Zhixing Li, 2021. "Analyzing the Adoption Challenges of the Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Smart Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-35, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalia E. Lozano-Ramírez & Omar Sánchez & Daniela Carrasco-Beltrán & Sofía Vidal-Méndez & Karen Castañeda, 2023. "Digitalization and Sustainability in Linear Projects Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-38, November.
    2. Shengxuan Tang & Ming Cai & Yao Xiao, 2024. "A Cross-Citation-Based Model for Technological Advancement Assessment: Methodology and Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mustufa Haider Abidi & Usama Umer & Muneer Khan Mohammed & Mohamed K. Aboudaif & Hisham Alkhalefah, 2020. "Automated Maintenance Data Classification Using Recurrent Neural Network: Enhancement by Spotted Hyena-Based Whale Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-33, November.
    2. Akshita Bassi & Aditya Manchanda & Rajwinder Singh & Mahesh Patel, 2023. "A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of compressive strength of rice husk ash-based concrete," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(1), pages 209-238, August.
    3. Sun, Yanwei & Ai, Hongying & Li, Ying & Wang, Run & Ma, Renfeng, 2024. "Data-driven large-scale spatial planning framework for determining size and location of offshore wind energy development: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    4. Styliani Karamountzou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2023. "Suitability and Sustainability Assessment of Existing Onshore Wind Farms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    5. James Ogundiran & Ehsan Asadi & Manuel Gameiro da Silva, 2024. "A Systematic Review on the Use of AI for Energy Efficiency and Indoor Environmental Quality in Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, April.
    6. Titov Sergei & Trachuk Arkady & Linder Natalya & RD Pathak & Danny Samson & Zafar Husain & S Sushil, 2023. "Digital transformation enablers in high-tech and low-tech companies: A comparative analysis," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(4), pages 801-843, November.
    7. Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Shah Siddharth & Nicholas Chileshe & Badr Alsolami & Mohammed Magdy Hamed, 2022. "Addressing of Value Management Implementation Barriers within the Indian Construction Industry: A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Alicja Lenarczyk & Marcin Jaskólski & Paweł Bućko, 2022. "The Application of a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Indication of Directions of the Development of Renewable Energy Sources in the Context of Energy Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Boda Liu & Bin Yang & Jianzhuang Xiao & Dayu Zhu & Binghan Zhang & Zhichen Wang & Miaosi Dong, 2021. "Review of Optimization Dynamically Applied in the Construction and the Application Potential of ICT," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Andrzej Pacana & Karolina Czerwińska, 2023. "A Quality Control Improvement Model That Takes into Account the Sustainability Concept and KPIs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Idris Othman & Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Nicholas Chileshe & Mohanad Kamil Buniya, 2020. "Identifying and Assessing Sustainable Value Management Implementation Activities in Developing Countries: The Case of Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Yanhong Guo & Yifang Dong & Xu Wei & Yifei Dong, 2023. "Effects of Continuous Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Technology on the Behavior of Holders’ Farmland Quality Protection: The Role of Social Norms and Green Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Steven J. Schuldt & Mathew R. Nicholson & Yaquarri A. Adams & Justin D. Delorit, 2021. "Weather-Related Construction Delays in a Changing Climate: A Systematic State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Musa Mohammed & Nasir Shafiq & Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi & Ehab Farouk Rashed & Mohamed Hassan Khalil & Noor Amila Zawawi & Abubakar Muhammad & Aminu Mubarak Sadis, 2022. "The Mediating Role of Policy-Related Factors in the Relationship between Practice of Waste Generation and Sustainable Construction Waste Minimisation: PLS-SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Tian Zhu & Guangchen Liu, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Methodology to Study the Risk Management of Prefabricated Building Supply Chains: An Outlook for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Alphan, Hakan, 2024. "Incorporating visibility information into multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) for wind turbine deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    17. Marija Z. Ivanović & Đorđe Nedeljković & Zoran Stojadinović & Dejan Marinković & Nenad Ivanišević & Nevena Simić, 2022. "Detection and In-Depth Analysis of Causes of Delay in Construction Projects: Synergy between Machine Learning and Expert Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Bartosz Radomski & Tomasz Mróz, 2023. "Application of the Hybrid MCDM Method for Energy Modernisation of an Existing Public Building—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Carlos Araújo-Rey & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2021. "An Approach to the Analysis of Causes of Delays in Industrial Construction Projects through Planning and Statistical Computing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    20. Meysam Asadi & Kazem Pourhossein & Younes Noorollahi & Mousa Marzband & Gregorio Iglesias, 2023. "A New Decision Framework for Hybrid Solar and Wind Power Plant Site Selection Using Linear Regression Modeling Based on GIS-AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11848-:d:1208553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.