IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p7768-d1142749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydrodeoxygenation of Pyrolysis Oil in Supercritical Ethanol with Formic Acid as an In Situ Hydrogen Source over NiMoW Catalysts Supported on Different Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Mingyuan Zhang

    (Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
    These authors contribute equally to this work.)

  • Xue Han

    (CanmetMATERIALS, Natural Resources Canada, Hamilton, ON L8P 0A5, Canada
    These authors contribute equally to this work.)

  • Huanang Wang

    (Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada)

  • Yimin Zeng

    (CanmetMATERIALS, Natural Resources Canada, Hamilton, ON L8P 0A5, Canada)

  • Chunbao Charles Xu

    (Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada)

Abstract

Hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) is one of the most promising approaches to upgrading pyrolysis oils, but this process normally operates over expensive noble metal catalysts (e.g., Ru/C, Pt/Al 2 O 3 ) under high-pressure hydrogen gas, which raises processing costs and safety concerns. In this study, a wood-derived pyrolysis oil was upgraded in supercritical ethanol using formic acid as an in situ hydrogen source at 300 °C and 350 °C, over a series of nickel–molybdenum-tungsten (NiMoW) catalysts supported on different materials, including Al 2 O 3 , activated carbon, sawdust carbon, and multiwalled nanotubes (MWNTs). The upgrading was also conducted under hydrogen gas (an ex situ hydrogen source) for comparison. The upgrading process was evaluated by oil yield, degree of deoxygenation (DOD), and oil qualities. The NiMoW/MWNT catalyst showed the best HDO performance among all the catalysts tested at 350 °C, with 74.8% and 70.9% of oxygen in the raw pyrolysis oil removed under in situ and ex situ hydrogen source conditions, respectively, which is likely owing to the large pore size and volume of the MWNT support material, while the in situ hydrogen source outperformed the ex situ hydrogen source in terms of upgraded oil yields and qualities, regardless of the catalysts employed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingyuan Zhang & Xue Han & Huanang Wang & Yimin Zeng & Chunbao Charles Xu, 2023. "Hydrodeoxygenation of Pyrolysis Oil in Supercritical Ethanol with Formic Acid as an In Situ Hydrogen Source over NiMoW Catalysts Supported on Different Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7768-:d:1142749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7768/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7768/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharma, Vinit & Getahun, Tokuma & Verma, Minal & Villa, Alberto & Gupta, Neeraj, 2020. "Carbon based catalysts for the hydrodeoxygenation of lignin and related molecules: A powerful tool for the generation of non-petroleum chemical products including hydrocarbons," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Qin, Zhangcai & Zhuang, Qianlai & Cai, Ximing & He, Yujie & Huang, Yao & Jiang, Dong & Lin, Erda & Liu, Yaling & Tang, Ya & Wang, Michael Q., 2018. "Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2387-2400.
    3. Perkins, Greg & Bhaskar, Thallada & Konarova, Muxina, 2018. "Process development status of fast pyrolysis technologies for the manufacture of renewable transport fuels from biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 292-315.
    4. Thongkumkoon, Skonrach & Kiatkittipong, Worapon & Hartley, Unalome Wetwatana & Laosiripojana, Navadol & Daorattanachai, Pornlada, 2019. "Catalytic activity of trimetallic sulfided Re-Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 toward deoxygenation of palm feedstocks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 111-123.
    5. Ansari, Khursheed B. & Kamal, Bushra & Beg, Sidra & Wakeel Khan, Md. Aquib & Khan, Mohd Shariq & Al Mesfer, Mohammed K. & Danish, Mohd., 2021. "Recent developments in investigating reaction chemistry and transport effects in biomass fast pyrolysis: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Palizdar, A. & Sadrameli, S.M., 2020. "Catalytic upgrading of biomass pyrolysis oil over tailored hierarchical MFI zeolite: Effect of porosity enhancement and porosity-acidity interaction on deoxygenation reactions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 674-688.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alhassan Ibrahim & Islam Elsayed & El Barbary Hassan, 2024. "Catalytic Upgrading of Rice Straw Bio-Oil via Esterification in Supercritical Ethanol over Bimetallic Catalyst Supported on Rice Straw Biochar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stančin, H. & Mikulčić, H. & Wang, X. & Duić, N., 2020. "A review on alternative fuels in future energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Weng, Yuwei & Chang, Shiyan & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2019. "Exploring the impacts of biofuel expansion on land use change and food security based on a land explicit CGE model: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 514-525.
    3. Hu, Hangli & Luo, Yanru & Zou, Jianfeng & Zhang, Shukai & Yellezuome, Dominic & Rahman, Md Maksudur & Li, Yingkai & Li, Chong & Cai, Junmeng, 2022. "Exploring aging kinetic mechanisms of bio-oil from biomass pyrolysis based on change in carbonyl content," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 782-790.
    4. Anca-Couce, A. & Hochenauer, C. & Scharler, R., 2021. "Bioenergy technologies, uses, market and future trends with Austria as a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Zhang, Ping & Zhuo, La & Li, Meng & Liu, Yilin & Wu, Pute, 2023. "Assessment of advanced bioethanol potential under water and land resource constraints in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 359-371.
    6. Chen, Yu-Kai & Lin, Cheng-Han & Wang, Wei-Cheng, 2020. "The conversion of biomass into renewable jet fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    7. Andrew N. Amenaghawon & Chinedu L. Anyalewechi & Charity O. Okieimen & Heri Septya Kusuma, 2021. "Biomass pyrolysis technologies for value-added products: a state-of-the-art review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14324-14378, October.
    8. Małgorzata Sieradzka & Agata Mlonka-Mędrala & Izabela Kalemba-Rec & Markus Reinmöller & Felix Küster & Wojciech Kalawa & Aneta Magdziarz, 2022. "Evaluation of Physical and Chemical Properties of Residue from Gasification of Biomass Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    10. Xiaozhe Ma & Leying Wu & Yongbin Zhu & Jing Wu & Yaochen Qin, 2022. "Simulation of Vegetation Carbon Sink of Arbor Forest and Carbon Mitigation of Forestry Bioenergy in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Lu Jiang & Xingpeng Chen & Bing Xue, 2019. "Features, Driving Forces and Transition of the Household Energy Consumption in China: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Stefania Lucantonio & Andrea Di Giuliano & Leucio Rossi & Katia Gallucci, 2023. "Green Diesel Production via Deoxygenation Process: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-44, January.
    13. Brassard, P. & Godbout, S. & Hamelin, L., 2021. "Framework for consequential life cycle assessment of pyrolysis biorefineries: A case study for the conversion of primary forestry residues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    14. He, Jiaxin & Liu, Ying & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Should China support the development of biomass power generation?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 416-425.
    15. Montalvo-Navarrete, Juan M. & Lasso-Palacios, Ana P., 2024. "Energy access sustainability criteria definition for Colombian rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    16. Weiwei Wang, 2023. "Integrated Assessment of Economic Supply and Environmental Effects of Biomass Co-Firing in Coal Power Plants: A Case Study of Jiangsu, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Zhu, Deao & Wang, Qinhui & Xie, Guilin & Ye, Zefu & Zhu, Zhujun & Ye, Chao, 2024. "Effect of air equivalence ratio on the characteristics of biomass partial gasification for syngas and biochar co-production in the fluidized bed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    18. Kung, Chih-Chun & Mu, Jianhong E., 2019. "Prospect of China's renewable energy development from pyrolysis and biochar applications under climate change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Gouws, S.M. & Carrier, M. & Bunt, J.R. & Neomagus, H.W.J.P., 2021. "Co-pyrolysis of coal and raw/torrefied biomass: A review on chemistry, kinetics and implementation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    20. Giuseppe Di Vito Nolfi & Katia Gallucci & Leucio Rossi, 2021. "Green Diesel Production by Catalytic Hydrodeoxygenation of Vegetables Oils," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-28, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7768-:d:1142749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.