IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5341-d804796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptual Framework of a Simulation-Based Manpower Planning Method for Construction Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Sławomir Biruk

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Piotr Jaśkowski

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Magdalena Maciaszczyk

    (Department of Strategy and Business Planning, Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

The authors put forward a concept of a method to support workforce demand planning intended for construction contractors. The construction business suffers from shortages of skilled labor. The method facilitates analyzing the possibilities of project-to project resource sharing and uncertainties in the flow of new orders, both characteristics of construction. Construction contractors’ manpower planning is based on a production plan. A precise and deterministic plan is possible only for a short planning horizon covering a fixed set of acquired orders. New orders are won irregularly, and the type and quantity of work they involve is uncertain. For this reason, the authors argue for using a simulation model of the company’s production plan. Such a plan facilitates mapping the variability in the number of orders, their start dates and delivery times, as well as workloads. Simulating the flow of prospective orders helps assess the degree of utilization of the enterprise’s human resources and the influence of the size of employment on the timeliness of the execution of individual projects. This provides a basis for determining reasonable employment levels. The approach helps determine the demand for manpower and provides the data necessary in the process of staff development and recruitment. Moreover, it provides a tool for assessing the feasibility of using in-house resources to fulfill new orders and the need to hire subcontractors. The novelty presented in the article is the method of manpower planning in construction companies, making it possible to take into account risk conditions in acquiring new orders and the variability of construction process execution times due to factors disturbing the work flow. The concept of the method was the basis for the development of a simulation model of the construction company’s order execution under random conditions, allowing for the evaluation of the effects of maintaining different levels of employment of the workforce in terms of the degree of utilization of the production potential and timeliness of individual projects. Thus, the result of the research is a tool supporting the decision making of construction managers in human resources management practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Sławomir Biruk & Piotr Jaśkowski & Magdalena Maciaszczyk, 2022. "Conceptual Framework of a Simulation-Based Manpower Planning Method for Construction Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5341-:d:804796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5341/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5341/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oleкsandr Shevchuk & Nataliya Matyukhina & Oleкsandra Babaieva & Anatoliy Dudnikov & Olena Volianska, 2021. "The human right to security in the implementation of the concept of the "right to health protection"," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 11(3), pages 535-548, December.
    2. Elmaghraby, Salah E., 2000. "On criticality and sensitivity in activity networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 220-238, December.
    3. Zenon Pokojski & Agnieszka Kister & Marcin Lipowski, 2022. "Remote Work Efficiency from the Employers’ Perspective—What’s Next?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Mária Srebalová & František Vojtech, 2021. "SME Development in the Visegrad Area," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, in: Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir (ed.), Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives, pages 269-281, Springer.
    5. Bowers, J., 1996. "Identifying critical activities in stochastic resource constrained networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 37-46, February.
    6. Song, Jie & Martens, Annelies & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2022. "Using Earned Value Management and Schedule Risk Analysis with resource constraints for project control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 451-466.
    7. Edward W. Davis & James H. Patterson, 1975. "A Comparison of Heuristic and Optimum Solutions in Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(8), pages 944-955, April.
    8. Nadežda Jankelová & Andrea Jankurová & Martina Beňová & Zuzana Skorková, 2018. "Security of the business organizations as a result of the economic crisis," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 659-671, March.
    9. Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Muhammad Babar Ali Rabbani & Qaiser Iqbal & Ahsen Maqsoom & Waqas Farooq, 2021. "Construction Sector Contribution to Economic Stability: Malaysian GDP Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, April.
    10. Edwin Thomas Banobi & Wooyong Jung, 2019. "Causes and Mitigation Strategies of Delay in Power Construction Projects: Gaps between Owners and Contractors in Successful and Unsuccessful Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Mahdi Bastan & Hamed Shakouri Ganjavi & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2020. "Educational demographics: a system dynamics model for human resource management," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(3), pages 662-676, June.
    12. Halbast Hussein Hamadamin & Tarik Atan, 2019. "The Impact of Strategic Human Resource Management Practices on Competitive Advantage Sustainability: The Mediation of Human Capital Development and Employee Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Anahita Safarishahrbijari, 2018. "Workforce forecasting models: A systematic review," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(7), pages 739-753, November.
    14. Gruetzemacher, Ross & Paradice, David & Lee, Kang Bok, 2020. "Forecasting extreme labor displacement: A survey of AI practitioners," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rainer Kolisch & Andreas Drexl, 1996. "Adaptive search for solving hard project scheduling problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 23-40, February.
    2. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    3. Drexl, Andreas & Kolisch, Rainer, 1991. "Produktionsplanung und -steuerung bei Einzel- und Kleinserienfertigung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 281, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    4. Richard E. Wendell & Timothy J. Lowe & Mike M. Gordon, 2023. "Dangers in using earned duration and other earned value metrics to measure a project’s schedule performance," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 665-680, June.
    5. George L. Vairaktarakis, 2003. "The Value of Resource Flexibility in the Resource-Constrained Job Assignment Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 718-732, June.
    6. Salewski, Frank & Schirmer, Andreas & Drexl, Andreas, 1996. "Project Scheduling under Resource and Mode Identity Constraints. Part II: An Application to Audit-Staff Scheduling," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 388, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    7. Schirmer, Andreas & Riesenberg, Sven, 1997. "Parameterized heuristics for project scheduling: Biased random sampling methods," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 456, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    8. Salewski, Frank & Nissen, Rüdiger, 1993. "Revidierende hierarchische Planung: Ein Konzept am Beispiel der Personaleinsatzplanung in Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaften," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 335, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    9. Usman Ismaila & Wooyong Jung & Chan Young Park, 2022. "Delay Causes and Types in Nigerian Power Construction Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Aristide Mingozzi & Vittorio Maniezzo & Salvatore Ricciardelli & Lucio Bianco, 1998. "An Exact Algorithm for the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem Based on a New Mathematical Formulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(5), pages 714-729, May.
    11. Tien-Fu Liang & Tien-Shou Huang & Ming-Feng Yang, 2012. "Application of fuzzy mathematical programming to imprecise project management decisions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1451-1470, August.
    12. Mario Paguay & Juan Diego Febres & Eduardo Valarezo, 2023. "Occupational Accidents in Ecuador: An Approach from the Construction and Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Drexl, Andreas, 1990. "Scheduling of project networks by job assignment," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 247, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    14. Azaron, Amir & Fatemi Ghomi, S.M.T., 2008. "Lower bound for the mean project completion time in dynamic PERT networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 120-127, April.
    15. R A Bowman, 2007. "Efficient sensitivity analysis of PERT network performance measures to significant changes in activity time parameters," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(10), pages 1354-1360, October.
    16. Amal Alnamrouti & Husam Rjoub & Hale Ozgit, 2022. "Do Strategic Human Resources and Artificial Intelligence Help to Make Organisations More Sustainable? Evidence from Non-Governmental Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Godfred Anakpo & Zanele Nqwayibana & Syden Mishi, 2023. "The Impact of Work-from-Home on Employee Performance and Productivity: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Kolisch, Rainer, 1994. "Serial and parallel resource-constrained projekt scheduling methodes revisited: Theory and computation," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 344, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    19. Judit Vitéz-Durgula & Anna Dunay & Gergő Thalmeiner & Balázs Vajai & László Pataki, 2023. "Financial Analysis and Survival Research of the Visegrad Countries’ Health Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    20. Luh, Peter B. & Liu, Feng & Moser, Bryan, 1999. "Scheduling of design projects with uncertain number of iterations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 575-592, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5341-:d:804796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.