IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5119-d800949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiscale Accessibility—A New Perspective of Space Structuration

Author

Listed:
  • Nir Kaplan

    (Porter School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Zelig 10, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel)

  • Itzhak Omer

    (Department of Geography and the Human Environment, Porter School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Zelig 10, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel)

Abstract

Spatial accessibility is fundamentally related to the functional, economic and social performances of cities and geographical systems and, therefore, constitutes an essential aspect for spatial planning. Despite the significant progress made in accessibility research, little attention is given to the central role of accessibility in space organization and structuration. This study aimed to fill this gap. Based on an intensive literature review, our work shows the critical role of accessibility in space organization at different scales and sizes, starting from the basic concept of accessibility and its foundations in the classical locational theories and further to the methods and theories at the forefront of research. These processes also point to a unique contribution of multiscale accessibility in space structuration. Accordingly, we offer a conceptual framework to describe the multiscale process of space structuration with respect to local-urban, regional and national scales. We believe this framework may help in studying space and, more importantly, in understanding space. We hope this perspective forms an additional tier at the conceptual and methodological levels concerning accessibility and spatial organization and will encourage empirical studies in light of the suggested view.

Suggested Citation

  • Nir Kaplan & Itzhak Omer, 2022. "Multiscale Accessibility—A New Perspective of Space Structuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5119-:d:800949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5119/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5119/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Athanasios K. Vionis & Giorgos Papantoniou, 2019. "Central Place Theory Reloaded and Revised: Political Economy and Landscape Dynamics in the Longue Durée," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Alexander, D.W. & Merkert, R., 2021. "Applications of gravity models to evaluate and forecast US international air freight markets post-GFC," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 52-62.
    3. Sugie Lee & Chisun Yoo & Kyung Wook Seo, 2020. "Determinant Factors of Pedestrian Volume in Different Land-Use Zones: Combining Space Syntax Metrics with GIS-Based Built-Environment Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Brian J.L. Berry & William L. Garrison, 1958. "Recent Developments Of Central Place Theory," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 107-120, January.
    5. Marta C. González & César A. Hidalgo & Albert-László Barabási, 2009. "Understanding individual human mobility patterns," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7235), pages 238-238, March.
    6. Bastiaan De Goei & Martijn Burger & Frank Van Oort & Michael Kitson, 2010. "Functional Polycentrism and Urban Network Development in the Greater South East, United Kingdom: Evidence from Commuting Patterns, 1981-2001," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1149-1170.
    7. Wachs, Martin & Kumagai, T. Gordon, 1973. "Physical accessibility as a social indicator," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 437-456, October.
    8. Kathy Pain, 2008. "Examining 'Core-Periphery' Relationships in a Global City-Region: The Case of London and South East England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 1161-1172.
    9. Givoni, Moshe, 2017. "Assessing core-periphery relation through travel patterns - The case of Israel," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 73-85.
    10. Kayvan Karimi, 2018. "Space syntax: consolidation and transformation of an urban research field," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 1-4, January.
    11. R W Vickerman, 1974. "Accessibility, Attraction, and Potential: A Review of Some Concepts and Their Use in Determining Mobility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 6(6), pages 675-691, December.
    12. Samia Sharmin & Md. Kamruzzaman, 2018. "Meta-analysis of the relationships between space syntax measures and pedestrian movement," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 524-550, July.
    13. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    14. Rebecca C W Kwok & Anthony G O Yeh, 2004. "The Use of Modal Accessibility Gap as an Indicator for Sustainable Transport Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(5), pages 921-936, May.
    15. Nir Kaplan & David Burg & Itzhak Omer, 2022. "Multiscale accessibility and urban performance," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 687-703, February.
    16. Michael Batty & Richard Milton, 2021. "A new framework for very large-scale urban modelling," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(15), pages 3071-3094, November.
    17. Amila Jayasinghe & N. B. S. Madusanka & Chethika Abenayake & P. K. S. Mahanama, 2021. "A Modeling Framework: To Analyze the Relationship between Accessibility, Land Use and Densities in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Meta Berghauser Pont & Gianna Stavroulaki & Lars Marcus, 2019. "Development of urban types based on network centrality, built density and their impact on pedestrian movement," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(8), pages 1549-1564, October.
    19. Deboosere, Robbin & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2018. "Evaluating equity and accessibility to jobs by public transport across Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 54-63.
    20. Inho Hong & Woo-Sung Jung & Hang-Hyun Jo, 2019. "Gravity model explained by the radiation model on a population landscape," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, June.
    21. Carey Curtis, 2011. "Integrating Land Use with Public Transport: The Use of a Discursive Accessibility Tool to Inform Metropolitan Spatial Planning in Perth," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 179-197.
    22. Anas, Alex, 1983. "Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 13-23, February.
    23. Gil Solá, Ana & Vilhelmson, Bertil & Larsson, Anders, 2018. "Understanding sustainable accessibility in urban planning: Themes of consensus, themes of tension," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-10.
    24. Yong Fan & Shengdi Zhang & Zongyi He & Biao He & Haicong Yu & Xiaoxiao Ye & Hao Yang & Xiangmin Zhang & Zhifeng Chi, 2018. "Spatial Pattern and Evolution of Urban System Based on Gravity Model and Whole Network Analysis in the Huaihe River Basin of China," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, June.
    25. Chauncy D. Harris & Edward L. Ullman, 1945. "The Nature of Cities," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 242(1), pages 7-17, November.
    26. Boeing, Geoff, 2019. "Street Network Models and Measures for Every U.S. City, County, Urbanized Area, Census Tract, and Zillow-Defined Neighborhood," SocArXiv 7fxjz, Center for Open Science.
    27. Wen‐Tai Hsu, 2012. "Central Place Theory and City Size Distribution," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 122(563), pages 903-932, September.
    28. Camille Roth & Soong Moon Kang & Michael Batty & Marc Barthélemy, 2011. "Structure of Urban Movements: Polycentric Activity and Entangled Hierarchical Flows," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, January.
    29. Martijn Burger & Evert Meijers, 2012. "Form Follows Function? Linking Morphological and Functional Polycentricity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(5), pages 1127-1149, April.
    30. Itzhak Benenson & Karel Martens & Yodan Rofé & Ariela Kwartler, 2011. "Public transport versus private car GIS-based estimation of accessibility applied to the Tel Aviv metropolitan area," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 47(3), pages 499-515, December.
    31. Vandenbulcke, Grégory & Steenberghen, Thérèse & Thomas, Isabelle, 2009. "Mapping accessibility in Belgium: a tool for land-use and transport planning?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 39-53.
    32. Ana Condeço-Melhorado & Aura Reggiani & Javier Gutiérrez (ed.), 2014. "Accessibility and Spatial Interaction," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15267.
    33. Martijn J. Burger & Bert van der Knaap & Ronald S. Wall, 2014. "Polycentricity and the Multiplexity of Urban Networks," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 816-840, April.
    34. Christian Thiemann & Fabian Theis & Daniel Grady & Rafael Brune & Dirk Brockmann, 2010. "The Structure of Borders in a Small World," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-7, November.
    35. Zifeng Chen & Anthony Gar-On Yeh, 2019. "Accessibility Inequality and Income Disparity in Urban China: A Case Study of Guangzhou," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(1), pages 121-141, January.
    36. M. Bielik & R. König & S. Schneider & T. Varoudis, 2018. "Measuring the Impact of Street Network Configuration on the Accessibility to People and Walking Attractors," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 657-676, September.
    37. Andrew K. Copus, 2001. "From Core-periphery to Polycentric Development: Concepts of Spatial and Aspatial Peripherality," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 539-552, June.
    38. Chen, Yanguang, 2009. "Urban gravity model based on cross-correlation function and Fourier analyses of spatio-temporal process," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 603-614.
    39. Luis Fernando Lanaspa & Fernando Pueyo & Fernando Sanz, 2001. "The Public Sector and Core-Periphery Models," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(10), pages 1639-1649, September.
    40. Peter Hall, 2009. "Looking Backward, Looking Forward: The City Region of the Mid-21st Century," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 803-817.
    41. Anthony Chen & Chao Yang & Sirisak Kongsomsaksakul & Ming Lee, 2007. "Network-based Accessibility Measures for Vulnerability Analysis of Degradable Transportation Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 241-256, September.
    42. Chen Zhong & Michael Batty & Ed Manley & Jiaqiu Wang & Zijia Wang & Feng Chen & Gerhard Schmitt, 2016. "Variability in Regularity: Mining Temporal Mobility Patterns in London, Singapore and Beijing Using Smart-Card Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    43. Claudia Yamu & Akkelies van Nes & Chiara Garau, 2021. "Bill Hillier’s Legacy: Space Syntax—A Synopsis of Basic Concepts, Measures, and Empirical Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    44. Yao Shen & Kayvan Karimi, 2018. "Urban evolution as a spatio-functional interaction process: the case of central Shanghai," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 42-70, January.
    45. Ton, Danique & Duives, Dorine C. & Cats, Oded & Hoogendoorn-Lanser, Sascha & Hoogendoorn, Serge P., 2019. "Cycling or walking? Determinants of mode choice in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 7-23.
    46. Douglass C. North, 1955. "Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63(3), pages 243-243.
    47. Eric J. Miller, 2018. "Accessibility: measurement and application in transportation planning," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 551-555, September.
    48. Chen, Yanguang, 2015. "The distance-decay function of geographical gravity model: Power law or exponential law?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 174-189.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Savvas Emmanouilidis & Socrates Basbas & Alexandros Sdoukopoulos & Ioannis Politis, 2022. "Settlements along Main Road Axes: Blessing or Curse? Evaluating the Barrier Effect in a Small Greek Settlement," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen Zhong & Markus Schläpfer & Stefan Müller Arisona & Michael Batty & Carlo Ratti & Gerhard Schmitt, 2017. "Revealing centrality in the spatial structure of cities from human activity patterns," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(2), pages 437-455, February.
    2. Nir Kaplan & David Burg & Itzhak Omer, 2022. "Multiscale accessibility and urban performance," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 687-703, February.
    3. Shaodong Wang & Yanbin Liu & Wei Zhi & Xihua Wen & Weihua Zhou, 2020. "Discovering Urban Functional Polycentricity: A Traffic Flow-Embedded and Topic Modeling-Based Methodology Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Šveda, Martin & Madajová, Michala Sládeková, 2023. "Estimating distance decay of intra-urban trips using mobile phone data: The case of Bratislava, Slovakia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Tong, Lu & Zhou, Xuesong & Miller, Harvey J., 2015. "Transportation network design for maximizing space–time accessibility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 555-576.
    6. Yeran Sun & Hongchao Fan & Ming Li & Alexander Zipf, 2016. "Identifying the city center using human travel flows generated from location-based social networking data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(3), pages 480-498, May.
    7. Antti Vasanen, 2012. "Functional Polycentricity: Examining Metropolitan Spatial Structure through the Connectivity of Urban Sub-centres," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(16), pages 3627-3644, December.
    8. David Levinson & Hao Wu, 2020. "Towards a general theory of access," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    9. Zhang, Yuerong & Marshall, Stephen & Manley, Ed, 2021. "Understanding the roles of rail stations: Insights from network approaches in the London metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Martijn J. Burger & Evert J. Meijers & Frank G. Oort, 2014. "Multiple Perspectives on Functional Coherence: Heterogeneity and Multiplexity in the Randstad," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(4), pages 444-464, September.
    11. Shanming Jia & Chenglin Qin & Xinyue Ye, 2018. "The evolution of regional multi-pole growth," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(1), pages 189-207, July.
    12. Tom Hashimoto & Vladimír Pažitka & Dariusz Wójcik, 2022. "The spatial reach of financial centres: An empirical investigation of interurban trade in capital market services," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1255-1274, May.
    13. Weiyang Zhang & Ben Derudder, 2019. "How sensitive are measures of polycentricity to the choice of ‘centres’? A methodological and empirical exploration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3339-3357, December.
    14. Somwrita Sarkar & Hao Wu & David M Levinson, 2020. "Measuring polycentricity via network flows, spatial interaction and percolation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(12), pages 2402-2422, September.
    15. repec:elg:eechap:14395_20 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Feilong Hao & Ming Lu & Tingting Yu & Shijun Wang, 2024. "Identification and characterization of urban polycentric structure based on points of interest in Shenyang, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), March.
    17. Raphael BAR-EL & Dafna SCHWARTZ, 2003. "Economic Growth, Inequality And Spatial Demographic Distribution: A Brazilian Case," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 18, pages 147-170.
    18. Yingcheng Li & Nicholas Phelps, 2018. "Megalopolis unbound: Knowledge collaboration and functional polycentricity within and beyond the Yangtze River Delta Region in China, 2014," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(2), pages 443-460, February.
    19. Rayaprolu, Hema & Levinson, David, 2024. "Co-evolution of public transport access and ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    20. Arun Natarajan Hariharan & Arindam Biswas, 2020. "A Critical review of the Indian knowledge‐based industry location policy against its theoretical arguments," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 431-454, June.
    21. Miren Lafourcade & Jacques-François Thisse, 2011. "New Economic Geography: The Role of Transport Costs," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5119-:d:800949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.