IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p467-d475574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Modeling Framework: To Analyze the Relationship between Accessibility, Land Use and Densities in Urban Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Amila Jayasinghe

    (Urban Simulation Lab, Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka)

  • N. B. S. Madusanka

    (Urban Simulation Lab, Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka)

  • Chethika Abenayake

    (Urban Simulation Lab, Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka)

  • P. K. S. Mahanama

    (Urban Simulation Lab, Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka)

Abstract

The study proposes a framework to model the three-dimensional relationship among density, land use, and accessibility in urban areas constructively contributing to overcome the limitations noted in the domains of urban planning and transport planning. First, most of the existing studies have focused on the topological characteristics in capturing the accessibility, but a limited attention has been given on measuring the accessibility by considering both topological and roadway characteristics. Second, the existing research studies have acknowledged the relationship among density, land use, and accessibility while a limited attention has been given to develop a modeling framework to capture the three-dimensional relationship. The modelling framework was tested in three urban areas in Sri Lanka. The research first analyzed the three-dimensional relationship among density, land use, and accessibility in the case studies. Then, the study developed a set of regression models to capture the density from the land use and accesability. The proposed model recorded a satisfactory level of accuracy (i.e., R 2 > 0.70) on a par with internationally accepted standards. The relationship was further elaborated through a decision tree analysis and 4D plot diagrams. Findings of the study can be utilized to model the density of a given land use and the correspondent accessibility scenarios. The proposed model is capable of quantifying the impact of the changes in the density correspondent to the accessibility and land use. Therefore, the study concludes that this will be an effective tool for decision-makers in the fields of land-use planning and transport planning for scenario building, impact analysis, and the formulation of land use zoning and urban development plans aiming at the overarching sustainability of future cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Amila Jayasinghe & N. B. S. Madusanka & Chethika Abenayake & P. K. S. Mahanama, 2021. "A Modeling Framework: To Analyze the Relationship between Accessibility, Land Use and Densities in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:467-:d:475574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sugie Lee & Chisun Yoo & Kyung Wook Seo, 2020. "Determinant Factors of Pedestrian Volume in Different Land-Use Zones: Combining Space Syntax Metrics with GIS-Based Built-Environment Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Elżbieta Macioszek & Paulina Świerk & Agata Kurek, 2020. "The Bike-Sharing System as an Element of Enhancing Sustainable Mobility—A Case Study based on a City in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-29, April.
    3. Glen Bramley & Karryn Kirk, 2005. "Does Planning Make a Difference to Urban Form? Recent Evidence from Central Scotland," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(2), pages 355-378, February.
    4. Alexander Hellervik & Leonard Nilsson & Claes Andersson, 2019. "Preferential centrality – A new measure unifying urban activity, attraction and accessibility," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(7), pages 1331-1346, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sabina Puławska-Obiedowska & Tomasz Bajwoluk & Piotr Langer, 2022. "Impact of Transport Development on the Accessibility of Selected Functional Elements: The Case of the Suburban Zielonki Municipality within the Krakow Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Kamble, Tanushri & Bahadure, Sarika, 2021. "Investigating application of compact urban form in central Indian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Yunes Almansoub & Ming Zhong & Asif Raza & Muhammad Safdar & Abdelghani Dahou & Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Transportation Supply on Mixed Land-Use at the Parcel Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, May.
    4. Nir Kaplan & Itzhak Omer, 2022. "Multiscale Accessibility—A New Perspective of Space Structuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Amila Jayasinghe & Lindamullage Don Charls Hasintha Nawod Kalpana & Charithmali Chethika Abenayake & Pelpola Kankanamge Seneviratne Mahanama, 2021. "Urban Boundary Demarcation—An iCN Model Approach," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Congying Fang & Riken Homma & Qiang Liu & Hang Liu & Arbi Surya Satria Ridwan, 2022. "Research on the Factors of Pedestrian Volume in Different Functional Areas of Kumamoto City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Huub Ploegmakers & Pascal Beckers & Erwin Van der Krabben, 2018. "The impact of planning intervention on business development: Evidence from the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(14), pages 3252-3273, November.
    3. Katarzyna Turoń & Andrzej Kubik & Feng Chen & Hualan Wang & Bogusław Łazarz, 2020. "A Holistic Approach to Electric Shared Mobility Systems Development—Modelling and Optimization Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Jie Ding & Zhengdong Gao & Shanshan Ma, 2022. "Understanding Social Spaces in Tourist Villages through Space Syntax Analysis: Cases of Villages in Huizhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Qiang Sheng & Dongyang Wan & Boya Yu, 2021. "Effect of Space Configurational Attributes on Social Interactions in Urban Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Glen Bramley & David Watkins, 2014. "‘Measure Twice, Cut Once’—Revisiting the Strength and Impact of Local Planning Regulation of Housing Development in England," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 41(5), pages 863-884, October.
    7. Yongliang Deng & Haolun Guo & Miaomiao Meng & Ying Zhang & Shuangshuang Pei, 2020. "Exploring the Effects of Safety Climate on Worker’s Safety Behavior in Subway Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Ali Bakdur & Fumito Masui & Michal Ptaszynski, 2021. "Predicting Increase in Demand for Public Buses in University Students Daily Life Needs: Case Study Based on a City in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Shota Tabata, 2024. "A centrality measure for grid street network considering sequential route choice behaviour," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(3), pages 610-624, March.
    10. Jiawei Gui & Qunqi Wu, 2020. "Multiple Utility Analyses for Sustainable Public Transport Planning and Management: Evidence from GPS-Equipped Taxi Data in Haikou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-46, September.
    11. Curtis, Carey, 2012. "Delivering the 'D' in transit-oriented development: Examining the town planning challenge," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 5(3), pages 83-99.
    12. Hafni, Nur, 2021. "Optimization Of Destana Policies (Resilience Disaster Village) To Improve Community Preparedness For Flood Disaster In Bojonegoro District, Indonesia," OSF Preprints 9gfwh, Center for Open Science.
    13. Elżbieta Macioszek & Agata Kurek, 2021. "The Analysis of the Factors Determining the Choice of Park and Ride Facility Using a Multinomial Logit Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33, January.
    14. Wael M. ElDessouki, 2022. "Development of a Neighborhood Mobility Index for Assessing Mobility Disparities in Developing Countries with Application to the Greater Cairo Area, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Elżbieta Macioszek & Agata Kurek, 2020. "The Use of a Park and Ride System—A Case Study Based on the City of Cracow (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Tieqiao Xiao & Lanlan Sheng & Shaojie Zhang & Licheng Zheng & Taotao Shui, 2023. "Thermal Comfort Improvement Strategies for Outdoor Spaces in Traditional Villages Based on ENVI-Met: Shimengao Village in Chizhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Aleksandra Jadach-Sepioło & Maciej Zathey, 2021. "Alternative between Revitalisation of City Centres and the Rising Costs of Extensive Land Use from a Polish Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-31, May.
    18. Miriam Pirra & Sofia Kalakou & Angela Carboni & Mariana Costa & Marco Diana & Ana Rita Lynce, 2021. "A Preliminary Analysis on Gender Aspects in Transport Systems and Mobility Services: Presentation of a Survey Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Nir Kaplan & Itzhak Omer, 2022. "Multiscale Accessibility—A New Perspective of Space Structuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Kestutis Zaleckis & Szymon Chmielewski & Jūratė Kamičaitytė & Indre Grazuleviciute-Vileniske & Halina Lipińska, 2022. "Walkability Compass—A Space Syntax Solution for Comparative Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:467-:d:475574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.