IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2295-d751902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterization of Biochar Derived from Crop Residues for Soil Amendment, Carbon Sequestration and Energy Use

Author

Listed:
  • Govindarajan Venkatesh

    (ICAR—Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)

  • Kodigal A. Gopinath

    (ICAR—Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)

  • Kotha Sammi Reddy

    (ICAR—Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)

  • Baddigam Sanjeeva Reddy

    (ICAR—Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)

  • Mathyam Prabhakar

    (ICAR—Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)

  • Cherukumalli Srinivasarao

    (ICAR—National Academy of Agricultural Research Management (NAARM), Hyderabad 500 030, India)

  • Venugopalan Visha Kumari

    (ICAR—Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)

  • Vinod Kumar Singh

    (ICAR—Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)

Abstract

The crop residues generated in agricultural fields are mostly considered a burden due to their disposal issues. This study attempts to effectively use pigeon pea stalk (PPS) for biochar production, a promising source as a soil amendment for carbon sequestration and alternative fuel source. PPS was pyrolyzed at different loads and reaction times to optimize the kiln temperature (350–400 °C and 450–500 °C) and changes in physicochemical properties, higher heating value (HHV) and yield were assessed. The results indicated that biochar yield, volatile matter, bulk density, O/C and H/C atomic ratios decreased, whereas fixed carbon, ash content and total porosity increased with increasing kiln temperature across all loads. Biochar produced at 450–500 °C (18 kg load kiln −1 ) had higher total carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, recovered total carbon and total nitrogen, total potential carbon and CO 2 reduction potential. Biochar produced at 350–400 °C had the maximum cation exchange capability (43.0 cmol kg −1 ). Biochar has estimated O/C and H/C atomic ratios of 0.07–0.15 and 0.35–0.50, respectively. Biochar exhibited good agronomic characteristics and fulfilled key quality criteria of H/C < 0.7 and O/C < 0.4 for soil carbon sequestration, as described by the European Biochar Certificate and the International Biochar Initiative. The estimated mean residence time and the mass fraction of carbon that would remain after 100 years were consistently greater than 1000 years and 80%, respectively. The biochar produced at 450–500 °C (at 18.0 kg kiln −1 ) from PPS had higher fixed carbon (65.3%), energy density (1.51), energetic retention efficiency (53%), fuel ratio (4.88), and HHV (25.01 MJ kg −1 ), as well as lower H/C and O/C ratios, implying that it is suitable for use as an alternative solid fuel.

Suggested Citation

  • Govindarajan Venkatesh & Kodigal A. Gopinath & Kotha Sammi Reddy & Baddigam Sanjeeva Reddy & Mathyam Prabhakar & Cherukumalli Srinivasarao & Venugopalan Visha Kumari & Vinod Kumar Singh, 2022. "Characterization of Biochar Derived from Crop Residues for Soil Amendment, Carbon Sequestration and Energy Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2295-:d:751902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2295/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2295/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Yafei & Yu, Shili & Ge, Shun & Chen, Xingming & Ge, Xinlei & Chen, Mindong, 2017. "Hydrothermal carbonization of medical wastes and lignocellulosic biomass for solid fuel production from lab-scale to pilot-scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 312-323.
    2. Kezhen Qian & Ajay Kumar & Krushna Patil & Danielle Bellmer & Donghai Wang & Wenqiao Yuan & Raymond L. Huhnke, 2013. "Effects of Biomass Feedstocks and Gasification Conditions on the Physiochemical Properties of Char," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Anupam, Kumar & Sharma, Arvind Kumar & Lal, Priti Shivhare & Dutta, Suman & Maity, Sudip, 2016. "Preparation, characterization and optimization for upgrading Leucaena leucocephala bark to biochar fuel with high energy yielding," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 743-756.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Da-Hee An & Dong-Chil Chang & Kwang-Soo Kim & Ji-Eun Lee & Young-Lok Cha & Jae-Hee Jeong & Ji-Bong Choi & Soo-Yeon Kim, 2023. "Miscanthus-Derived Biochar Enhanced Soil Fertility and Soybean Growth in Upland Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nallagatla Vinod Kumar & Gajanan L. Sawargaonkar & C. Sudha Rani & Ajay Singh & T. Ram Prakash & S. Triveni & Prasad J. Kamdi & Rajesh Pasumarthi & Rayapati Karthik & Bathula Venkatesh, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Pigeonpea Stalk Biochar Characteristics and Energy Use under Different Biochar Production Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Yao, Zhongliang & Ma, Xiaoqian & Xiao, Zhiyuan, 2020. "The effect of two pretreatment levels on the pyrolysis characteristics of water hyacinth," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 514-527.
    3. Tu, Ren & Sun, Yan & Wu, Yujian & Fan, Xudong & Cheng, Shuchao & Jiang, Enchen & Xu, Xiwei, 2021. "Selective production of furfural and phenols from rice husk: the influence of synergetic pretreatments with different order," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 297-308.
    4. Arthur M. James R. & Wenqiao Yuan & Michael D. Boyette, 2016. "The Effect of Biomass Physical Properties on Top-Lit Updraft Gasification of Woodchips," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Xing Yang & Hailong Wang & Peter James Strong & Song Xu & Shujuan Liu & Kouping Lu & Kuichuan Sheng & Jia Guo & Lei Che & Lizhi He & Yong Sik Ok & Guodong Yuan & Ying Shen & Xin Chen, 2017. "Thermal Properties of Biochars Derived from Waste Biomass Generated by Agricultural and Forestry Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    6. María Pilar González-Vázquez & Roberto García & Covadonga Pevida & Fernando Rubiera, 2017. "Optimization of a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Plant for Low-Temperature Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Dang, Han & Xu, Runsheng & Zhang, Jianliang & Wang, Mingyong & Ye, Lian & Jia, Guoli, 2023. "Removal of oxygen-containing functional groups during hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: Experimental and DFT study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    8. Georgios Giakoumakis & Dorothea Politi & Dimitrios Sidiras, 2021. "Medical Waste Treatment Technologies for Energy, Fuels, and Materials Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-30, December.
    9. Lin, Yousheng & Ge, Ya & Xiao, Hanmin & He, Qing & Wang, Wenhao & Chen, Baiman, 2020. "Investigation of hydrothermal co-carbonization of waste textile with waste wood, waste paper and waste food from typical municipal solid wastes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    10. Da-Hee An & Dong-Chil Chang & Kwang-Soo Kim & Ji-Eun Lee & Young-Lok Cha & Jae-Hee Jeong & Ji-Bong Choi & Soo-Yeon Kim, 2023. "Miscanthus-Derived Biochar Enhanced Soil Fertility and Soybean Growth in Upland Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, September.
    11. Gyeong-Min Kim & Dae-Gyun Lee & Chung-Hwan Jeon, 2019. "Fundamental Characteristics and Kinetic Analysis of Lignocellulosic Woody and Herbaceous Biomass Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Natarianto Indrawan & Betty Simkins & Ajay Kumar & Raymond L. Huhnke, 2020. "Economics of Distributed Power Generation via Gasification of Biomass and Municipal Solid Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Wei, Yingyuan & Fakudze, Sandile & Zhang, Yiming & Ma, Ru & Shang, Qianqian & Chen, Jianqiang & Liu, Chengguo & Chu, Qiulu, 2022. "Co-hydrothermal carbonization of pomelo peel and PVC for production of hydrochar pellets with enhanced fuel properties and dechlorination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    14. Joselin Herbert, G.M. & Unni Krishnan, A., 2016. "Quantifying environmental performance of biomass energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 292-308.
    15. Peter Križan & Miloš Matú & Ľubomír Šooš & Juraj Beniak, 2015. "Behavior of Beech Sawdust during Densification into a Solid Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Yang, Fangming & Liu, Xin & Li, Mengbin & Uguna, Clement & Wang, Wenlong & Sun, Chenggong, 2023. "Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) derived microporous carbons prepared via hydrothermal dechlorination and potassium hydroxide activation for efficient CO2 capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    17. Zhuang, Xiuzheng & Liu, Jianguo & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Chenguang & Zhan, Hao & Ma, Longlong, 2022. "A review on the utilization of industrial biowaste via hydrothermal carbonization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    18. Huang, Yu-Fong & Cheng, Pei-Hsin & Chiueh, Pei-Te & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2017. "Leucaena biochar produced by microwave torrefaction: Fuel properties and energy efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1018-1025.
    19. Hanoğlu, Alper & Çay, Ahmet & Yanık, Jale, 2019. "Production of biochars from textile fibres through torrefaction and their characterisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 664-673.
    20. Umut Şen & Bruno Esteves & Helena Pereira, 2023. "Pyrolysis and Extraction of Bark in a Biorefineries Context: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2295-:d:751902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.