IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1903-d743867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of Non-Crop Plant Mixes Informed by Arthropod-Plant Network Analyses for Multiple Ecosystem Services Delivery Towards Ecological Intensification of Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Supratim Laha

    (Centre for Agroecology & Pollination Studies, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700019, India
    Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700019, India)

  • Soumik Chatterjee

    (Centre for Agroecology & Pollination Studies, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700019, India)

  • Amlan Das

    (Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700019, India)

  • Barbara Smith

    (Centre for Agroecology & Pollination Studies, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700019, India
    Centre for Agroecology Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK)

  • Parthiba Basu

    (Centre for Agroecology & Pollination Studies, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700019, India
    Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700019, India)

Abstract

Ecological intensification (EI) of agriculture through the improvement of ecosystem service delivery has recently emerged as the alternative to the conventional intensification of agriculture that is widely considered unsustainable and has negative impacts on the environment. Although tropical agricultural landscapes are still heterogeneous, they are rapidly losing diversity due to agricultural intensification. Restoration of natural or semi-natural habitats, habitat diversity, and provision of multiple benefits have been identified as important targets for the transition to EI. Choosing the right plant mixes for the restoration of habitats that can offer multiple ecosystem service benefits is therefore crucial. The selection of candidate species for plant mixes is generally informed by studies focusing on a specific ecosystem service (e.g., pollination) and not based on the whole arthropod—non-crop plant interactions matrix. In this study, we try to identify non-crop plant mixes that would provide habitat for pollinators, act as refugia for natural pest predators, and also as a trap crop for potential crop pests by studying non-crop plants—arthropod interaction network. We have identified the non-crop plant species mixes by first identifying the connector species based on their centrality in the network and then by studying how their sequential exclusions affect the stability of the network.

Suggested Citation

  • Supratim Laha & Soumik Chatterjee & Amlan Das & Barbara Smith & Parthiba Basu, 2022. "Selection of Non-Crop Plant Mixes Informed by Arthropod-Plant Network Analyses for Multiple Ecosystem Services Delivery Towards Ecological Intensification of Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1903-:d:743867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1903/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1903/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Crossman, Neville D. & Connor, Jeffrey D. & Bryan, Brett A. & Summers, David M. & Ginnivan, John, 2010. "Reconfiguring an irrigation landscape to improve provision of ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1031-1042, March.
    2. Prisila A. Mkenda & Patrick A. Ndakidemi & Philip C. Stevenson & Sarah E. J. Arnold & Steven R. Belmain & Maneno Chidege & Geoff M. Gurr, 2019. "Field Margin Vegetation in Tropical African Bean Systems Harbours Diverse Natural Enemies for Biological Pest Control in Adjacent Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Eduardo Freitas Moreira & Danilo Boscolo & Blandina Felipe Viana, 2015. "Spatial Heterogeneity Regulates Plant-Pollinator Networks across Multiple Landscape Scales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Jordán, Ferenc & Okey, Thomas A. & Bauer, Barbara & Libralato, Simone, 2008. "Identifying important species: Linking structure and function in ecological networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 75-80.
    5. Aislyn A. Keyes & John P. McLaughlin & Allison K. Barner & Laura E. Dee, 2021. "An ecological network approach to predict ecosystem service vulnerability to species losses," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catur Putri Enggit Reksiana & Wiwin Windriyanti & Ramadhani Mahendra Kusuma, 2023. "Fostering Biodiversity: Unleashing the Potential of Refugia to Enhance Arthropod Diversity in Chili (Capsicum annuum L.) Farms," BIOEDUSCIENCE, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, vol. 7(3), pages 251-260.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lankford, B. & Makin, Ian & Matthews, N. & McCornick, Peter G. & Noble, A. & Shah, Tushaar, "undated". "A compact to revitalise large-scale irrigation systems using a leadership-partnership-ownership 'Theory of Change'," Papers published in Journals (Open Access) H047459, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Hrozencik, Aaron & Aillery, Marcel, 2021. "Trends in U.S. Irrigated Agriculture: Increasing Resilience Under Water Supply Scarcity," Economic Information Bulletin 327359, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Bark, Rosalind H. & Colloff, Matthew J. & Hatton MacDonald, Darla & Pollino, Carmel A. & Jackson, Sue & Crossman, Neville D., 2016. "Integrated valuation of ecosystem services obtained from restoring water to the environment in a major regulated river basin," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PB), pages 381-391.
    4. Maraseni, Tek Narayan & Cockfield, Geoff, 2015. "The financial implications of converting farmland to state-supported environmental plantings in the Darling Downs region, Queensland," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 57-65.
    5. Hrozencik, Aaron & Aillery, Marcel, 2021. "Trends in U.S. Irrigated Agriculture: Increasing Resilience Under Water Supply Scarcity," USDA Miscellaneous 316792, United States Department of Agriculture.
    6. Schägner, Jan Philipp & Brander, Luke & Maes, Joachim & Hartje, Volkmar, 2013. "Mapping ecosystem services' values: Current practice and future prospects," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 33-46.
    7. Móréh, Ágnes & Endrédi, Anett & Piross, Sándor Imre & Jordán, Ferenc, 2021. "Topology of additive pairwise effects in food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    8. Jan Philipp Schägner & Luke Brander & Joachim Maes & Volkmar Hartje, 2012. "Mapping Ecosystem Services’ Values: Current Practice and Future Prospects," Working Papers 2012.59, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Yu, Shuying & Peng, Jian & Xia, Pei & Wang, Qi & Grabowski, Robert C & Azhoni, Adani & Bala, Brij & Shankar, Vijay & Meersmans, Jeroen, 2023. "Network analysis of water-related ecosystem services in search of solutions for sustainable catchment management: A case study in Sutlej-Beas River systems, India," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Montilla-López, Nazaret M., 2020. "Self-financed water bank for resource reallocation to the environment and within the agricultural sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Torres-Alruiz, Maria Daniela & Rodríguez, Diego J., 2013. "A topo-dynamical perspective to evaluate indirect interactions in trophic webs: New indexes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 363-369.
    12. Morrison, Mark & Wheeler, Sarah Ann & Hatton MacDonald, Darla, 2012. "Towards a more nuanced discussion of the net-benefits of sharing water in the Murray-Darling Basin," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 8(2), pages 1-12, April.
    13. Jordán, Ferenc, 2022. "The network perspective: Vertical connections linking organizational levels," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    14. Almpanidou, Vasiliki & Mazaris, Antonios D. & Mertzanis, Yorgos & Avraam, Ioannis & Antoniou, Ioannis & Pantis, John D. & Sgardelis, Stefanos P., 2014. "Providing insights on habitat connectivity for male brown bears: A combination of habitat suitability and landscape graph-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 286(C), pages 37-44.
    15. Jordán, Ferenc & Liu, Wei-chung & Mike, Ágnes, 2009. "Trophic field overlap: A new approach to quantify keystone species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(21), pages 2899-2907.
    16. Losapio, Gianalberto & Jordán, Ferenc & Caccianiga, Marco & Gobbi, Mauro, 2015. "Structure-dynamic relationship of plant–insect networks along a primary succession gradient on a glacier foreland," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 314(C), pages 73-79.
    17. Zhu, Xueting & Mu, Xianzhong & Hu, Guangwen, 2019. "Ecological network analysis of urban energy metabolic system—A case study of Beijing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 404(C), pages 36-45.
    18. Simpson, Tony G. & Druppel, Jennifer L. & Watson, Marissa C. & Benson, Bennett I. & Mullen, Jeffrey D., 2011. "Comparing Ecological Sensitivity with Stream Flow Rates in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103259, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Bryan, Brett Anthony & Crossman, Neville David, 2013. "Impact of multiple interacting financial incentives on land use change and the supply of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 60-72.
    20. Mao, Zhun & Centanni, Julia & Pommereau, Franck & Stokes, Alexia & Gaucherel, Cédric, 2021. "Maintaining biodiversity promotes the multifunctionality of social-ecological systems: holistic modelling of a mountain system," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1903-:d:743867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.