IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i22p6399-d286758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Field Margin Vegetation in Tropical African Bean Systems Harbours Diverse Natural Enemies for Biological Pest Control in Adjacent Crops

Author

Listed:
  • Prisila A. Mkenda

    (Department of Sustainable Agriculture, Biodiversity and Ecosystems Management, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 447, Arusha 23311, Tanzania
    Department of biosciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3000, Morogoro 67129, Tanzania)

  • Patrick A. Ndakidemi

    (Department of Sustainable Agriculture, Biodiversity and Ecosystems Management, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 447, Arusha 23311, Tanzania)

  • Philip C. Stevenson

    (Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK
    Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond Surrey TW9 3AB, UK)

  • Sarah E. J. Arnold

    (Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK)

  • Steven R. Belmain

    (Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK)

  • Maneno Chidege

    (Department of Research, Plant Protection Division, Tropical Pesticide Research Institute (TPRI), P.O. Box 3024, Arusha 23201, Tanzania)

  • Geoff M. Gurr

    (Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, P.O. Box 883, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
    Institute of Applied Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

Non-crop vegetation around farmland can be valuable habitats for enhancing ecosystem services but little is known of the importance of field margins in supporting natural enemies of insect pests in tropical agriculture. This study was conducted in smallholder bean fields in three elevation zones to assess the importance of field margin vegetation to natural enemy populations and movement to the bean crop for biological pest control. The pests and natural enemies were assessed using different coloured water pan traps (to ensure the capture of insects with different colour preferences) and the interactions of the two arthropod groups with the margin vegetation and their movement to the bean crop were monitored using fluorescent dye. Sentinel plants were used to assess predation and parasitism levels. A total of 5003 natural enemies were captured, more in the field margin than within the bean field for low and mid elevation zones, while in the high elevation zone, they were more abundant within the bean field. Pests were more abundant in the crop than margins for all the elevation zones. The use of a dye applied to margin vegetation demonstrated that common natural enemy taxa moved to the crop during the days after dye application. The proportion of dye-marked natural enemies (showing their origin to be margin vegetation) sampled from the crop suggest high levels of spatial flux in the arthropod assemblage. Aphid mortality rates (measured by prey removal and parasitism levels on sentinel plants) did not differ between the field edges and field centre in any of the three elevation zones, suggesting that for this pest taxon, the centre of the fields still receive comparable pest control service as in the field edges. This study found that field margins around smallholder bean fields are useful habitats to large numbers of natural enemy taxa that move to adjacent crops providing biological pest control service.

Suggested Citation

  • Prisila A. Mkenda & Patrick A. Ndakidemi & Philip C. Stevenson & Sarah E. J. Arnold & Steven R. Belmain & Maneno Chidege & Geoff M. Gurr, 2019. "Field Margin Vegetation in Tropical African Bean Systems Harbours Diverse Natural Enemies for Biological Pest Control in Adjacent Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6399-:d:286758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6399/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6399/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Supratim Laha & Soumik Chatterjee & Amlan Das & Barbara Smith & Parthiba Basu, 2022. "Selection of Non-Crop Plant Mixes Informed by Arthropod-Plant Network Analyses for Multiple Ecosystem Services Delivery Towards Ecological Intensification of Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6399-:d:286758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.