IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p14776-d967835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Assessment of Giant Freshwater Prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii Farming through Life Cycle Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Baharuddin Haslawati

    (Fisheries Research Institute, FRI Glami Lemi, Titi, Jelebu 71650, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia)

  • Ibrahim Saadiah

    (Fisheries Research Institute, FRI Pulau Sayak, Kota Kuala Muda, Sungai Petani 08500, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Razman Pahri Siti-Dina

    (Centre for Research in Development, Social and Environment (SEEDS), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Murnira Othman

    (Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Talib Latif

    (Department of Earth Sciences and Environment, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

Abstract

The giant freshwater prawn (GFP), Macrobrachium rosenbergii has emerged as a significant crustacean in global aquaculture. A cradle-to-farm Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used to assess the potential environmental impacts of GFP in Malaysia. The four main iterative farming phases involved were pond preparation, stocking, farming, and harvesting. The impact categories chosen were global warming, terrestrial ecotoxicity, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, human non-carcinogenic toxicity, human carcinogenic activity, and water consumption. The software SimaPro 9.3.0.3 was used for impact analysis, with background data from the database Ecoinvent 3.0. and ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) V1.06/World (2010). Among other environmental impact categories, stocking and harvesting phases contributed to human carcinogenic toxicity impact values of 33.33%, followed by farming (33.31%). Another impact category, freshwater ecotoxicity also produces the same pattern with the stocking and harvesting process, still generating the highest impact value of 33.34%, followed by farming (33.30%). Apart from the identified capital items that require consideration for future waste management in aquaculture, this LCA study found that M. rosenbergii farming generates a low impact to the environment, however, could inspire further research on other perspectives of sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Baharuddin Haslawati & Ibrahim Saadiah & Razman Pahri Siti-Dina & Murnira Othman & Mohd Talib Latif, 2022. "Environmental Assessment of Giant Freshwater Prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii Farming through Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14776-:d:967835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14776/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14776/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosamond L. Naylor & Rebecca J. Goldburg & Jurgenne H. Primavera & Nils Kautsky & Malcolm C. M. Beveridge & Jason Clay & Carl Folke & Jane Lubchenco & Harold Mooney & Max Troell, 2000. "Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6790), pages 1017-1024, June.
    2. Hayana Dullah & M. A. Malek & Marlia M. Hanafiah, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Nile Tilapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ) Farming in Kenyir Lake, Terengganu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeke Marshall & Paul E. Brockway, 2020. "A Net Energy Analysis of the Global Agriculture, Aquaculture, Fishing and Forestry System," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Ariel E. Turcios & Jutta Papenbrock, 2014. "Sustainable Treatment of Aquaculture Effluents—What Can We Learn from the Past for the Future?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Juszczyk, Juliusz, 2015. "Światowy rynek łososia hodowlanego – stan i perspektywy," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 15(30), pages 1-12, September.
    4. repec:mse:cesdoc:13002r is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Asche, Frank & Oglend, Atle, 2016. "The relationship between input-factor and output prices in commodity industries: The case of Norwegian salmon aquaculture," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 35-47.
    6. Zoe G Nichols & Scott Rikard & Sayyed Mohammad Hadi Alavi & William C Walton & Ian A E Butts, 2021. "Regulation of sperm motility in Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) spawning naturally in seawater with low salinity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Nesar Ahmed & Shirley Thompson & Giovanni M. Turchini, 2020. "Organic aquaculture productivity, environmental sustainability, and food security: insights from organic agriculture," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1253-1267, December.
    8. Hughes, Conchúr & King, Jonathan W., 2023. "Habitat suitability modelling for an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system along Europe's Atlantic coast," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    9. József Popp & László Váradi & Emese Békefi & András Péteri & Gergő Gyalog & Zoltán Lakner & Judit Oláh, 2018. "Evolution of Integrated Open Aquaculture Systems in Hungary: Results from a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Jesse Sherry & Jennifer Koester, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Aquaculture Stewardship Council Certified Atlantic Salmon ( Salmo salar )," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Thaler, S. & Zessner, M. & Weigl, M. & Rechberger, H. & Schilling, K. & Kroiss, H., 2015. "Possible implications of dietary changes on nutrient fluxes, environment and land use in Austria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 14-29.
    12. Prein, M., 2002. "Integration of aquaculture into crop-animal systems in Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-2), pages 127-146.
    13. Walsh, Michael J. & Gerber Van Doren, Léda & Shete, Nilam & Prakash, Akshay & Salim, Usama, 2018. "Financial tradeoffs of energy and food uses of algal biomass under stochastic conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 591-603.
    14. Awwal Bamanga & Nnamdi Henry Amaeze & Bader Al-Anzi, 2019. "Comparative Investigation of Total, Recoverable and Bioavailable Fractions of Sediment Metals and Metalloids in the Lagos Harbour and Lagoon System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Libralato, Simone & Solidoro, Cosimo, 2008. "A bioenergetic growth model for comparing Sparus aurata's feeding experiments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 325-337.
    16. Paul Ehrlich, 2011. "A personal view: environmental education—its content and delivery," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 6-13, March.
    17. Lee, Min-Kyu & Yoo, Seung-Hoon, 2014. "The role of the capture fisheries and aquaculture sectors in the Korean national economy: An input–output analysis," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 448-456.
    18. Felipe Lourenço & Ricardo Calado & Isabel Medina & Olga M. C. C. Ameixa, 2022. "The Potential Impacts by the Invasion of Insects Reared to Feed Livestock and Pet Animals in Europe and Other Regions: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-29, May.
    19. Teresa R. Johnson & Kate Beard & Damian C. Brady & Carrie J. Byron & Caitlin Cleaver & Kevin Duffy & Nicholas Keeney & Melissa Kimble & Molly Miller & Shane Moeykens & Mario Teisl & G. Peter van Walsu, 2019. "A Social-Ecological System Framework for Marine Aquaculture Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Dalton Belmudes & Fernanda S. David & Fernando H. Gonçalves & Wagner C. Valenti, 2021. "Sustainability Analysis of the Production of Early Stages of the Atlantic Forest Lambari ( Deuterodon iguape ) in a Public Hatchery at a Rainforest Conservation Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, May.
    21. Ren, Jeffrey S. & Ross, Alex H. & Hadfield, Mark G. & Hayden, Barbara J., 2010. "An ecosystem model for estimating potential shellfish culture production in sheltered coastal waters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 527-539.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14776-:d:967835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.