IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6361-d822048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential Impacts by the Invasion of Insects Reared to Feed Livestock and Pet Animals in Europe and Other Regions: A Critical Review

Author

Listed:
  • Felipe Lourenço

    (ECOMARE, CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Ricardo Calado

    (ECOMARE, CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Isabel Medina

    (IIM-CSIC-Instituto de Investigacións Mariñas-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, R/Eduardo Cabello Nº6, 36208 Vigo, Spain)

  • Olga M. C. C. Ameixa

    (ECOMARE, CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

While the use of alien insect species for food and feed can help to alleviate protein shortage and provide for a more sustainable feed production, their invasive potential should be considered since invasive alien species represent one of the five main global threats to biodiversity. In the European Union (EU), eight insect species have already been authorized to be used as feed ingredients for aquaculture organisms, pets, poultry, and pigs. These species were selected based on available national risk assessments, as most of them are non-native to Europe. However, it is not clear how these risk assessments truly consider all EU bioregions, given that the information used was mostly biased towards northern European regions. As a large proportion of invasive alien species already present in the EU were introduced unintentionally, it is therefore crucial to understand and manage the potential pathways of such introductions in a more effective way. Here, we provide a critical overview of the potential risks of rearing alien insect species as feed or as pet food (for both livestock and exotic pets) in the EU. The results showed that some of these insect species have an invasive potential, either due to their reproductive capacity in different climates or due to the fact that they have already established populations in areas where they were introduced, with negative effects on local ecosystems or causing economical losses. For this reason, it is recommended that risk assessments should be performed in other EU bioregions as well as monitoring programs to control the spread of insect species with invasive potential. In addition, other available native insect species with potential to be used as feed ingredients should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Felipe Lourenço & Ricardo Calado & Isabel Medina & Olga M. C. C. Ameixa, 2022. "The Potential Impacts by the Invasion of Insects Reared to Feed Livestock and Pet Animals in Europe and Other Regions: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-29, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6361-:d:822048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6361/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6361/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosamond L. Naylor & Rebecca J. Goldburg & Jurgenne H. Primavera & Nils Kautsky & Malcolm C. M. Beveridge & Jason Clay & Carl Folke & Jane Lubchenco & Harold Mooney & Max Troell, 2000. "Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6790), pages 1017-1024, June.
    2. Alexandratos, Nikos & Bruinsma, Jelle, 2012. "World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision," ESA Working Papers 288998, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    3. Xianhui Wang & Xiaodong Fang & Pengcheng Yang & Xuanting Jiang & Feng Jiang & Dejian Zhao & Bolei Li & Feng Cui & Jianing Wei & Chuan Ma & Yundan Wang & Jing He & Yuan Luo & Zhifeng Wang & Xiaojiao Gu, 2014. "The locust genome provides insight into swarm formation and long-distance flight," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kashif ur Rehman & Clemens Hollah & Karin Wiesotzki & Volker Heinz & Kemal Aganovic & Rashid ur Rehman & Janos-Istvan Petrusan & Longyu Zheng & Jibin Zhang & Summar Sohail & Muhammad Khalid Mansoor & , 2023. "Insect-Derived Chitin and Chitosan: A Still Unexploited Resource for the Edible Insect Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-34, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ascui, Francisco & Ball, Alex & Kahn, Lewis & Rowe, James, 2021. "Is operationalising natural capital risk assessment practicable?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    2. Achoja, Felix Odemero & Enujeke, Emmanuel Chukudinife & Ogisi, Oraye Dicta & Overehirha, Rebecca Tega, 2020. "Multinomial Regression Analysis of Yam (Dioscorea Spp.) Consumers' Preferences and Varietal Diversification Pattern in Nigeria," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 10(02), January.
    3. Zeke Marshall & Paul E. Brockway, 2020. "A Net Energy Analysis of the Global Agriculture, Aquaculture, Fishing and Forestry System," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27, June.
    4. Ariel E. Turcios & Jutta Papenbrock, 2014. "Sustainable Treatment of Aquaculture Effluents—What Can We Learn from the Past for the Future?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Juszczyk, Juliusz, 2015. "Światowy rynek łososia hodowlanego – stan i perspektywy," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 15(30), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Ya′nan Zhu & Jing He & Jiawen Wang & Wei Guo & Hongran Liu & Zhuoran Song & Le Kang, 2024. "Parental experiences orchestrate locust egg hatching synchrony by regulating nuclear export of precursor miRNA," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. James J Elser & Timothy J Elser & Stephen R Carpenter & William A Brock, 2014. "Regime Shift in Fertilizer Commodities Indicates More Turbulence Ahead for Food Security," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-7, May.
    8. repec:mse:cesdoc:13002r is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Vogel, Everton & Martinelli, Gabrielli & Artuzo, Felipe Dalzotto, 2021. "Environmental and economic performance of paddy field-based crop-livestock systems in Southern Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    10. Kik, M.C. & Claassen, G.D.H. & Meuwissen, M.P.M. & Smit, A.B. & Saatkamp, H.W., 2021. "Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    11. repec:ags:ijag24:346816 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Asche, Frank & Oglend, Atle, 2016. "The relationship between input-factor and output prices in commodity industries: The case of Norwegian salmon aquaculture," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 35-47.
    13. Mounir Amdaoud, 2019. "Ressources naturelles, innovation et développement économique : vers une nouvelle approche," CEPN Working Papers 2019-06, Centre d'Economie de l'Université de Paris Nord.
    14. Zoe G Nichols & Scott Rikard & Sayyed Mohammad Hadi Alavi & William C Walton & Ian A E Butts, 2021. "Regulation of sperm motility in Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) spawning naturally in seawater with low salinity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Nesar Ahmed & Shirley Thompson & Giovanni M. Turchini, 2020. "Organic aquaculture productivity, environmental sustainability, and food security: insights from organic agriculture," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1253-1267, December.
    16. Hughes, Conchúr & King, Jonathan W., 2023. "Habitat suitability modelling for an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system along Europe's Atlantic coast," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    17. Victor Nechifor & Matthew Winning, 2017. "The impacts of higher CO2 concentrations over global crop production and irrigation water requirements," EcoMod2017 10487, EcoMod.
    18. Bircol, Guilherme Augusto Carminato & Souza, Marcelo Pereira de & Fontes, Aurélio Teodoro & Chiarello, Adriano Garcia & Ranieri, Victor Eduardo Lima, 2018. "Planning by the rules: A fair chance for the environment in a land-use conflict area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 103-112.
    19. Maurer, Rainer, 2023. "Comparing the effect of different agricultural land-use systems on biodiversity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. József Popp & László Váradi & Emese Békefi & András Péteri & Gergő Gyalog & Zoltán Lakner & Judit Oláh, 2018. "Evolution of Integrated Open Aquaculture Systems in Hungary: Results from a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    21. Fayaz Ahmad Lone & M. Imran Ganaie & Showkat A. Ganaie & M. Shafi Bhat & Javeed Ahmad Rather, 2023. "Drivers of agricultural land-use change in Kashmir valley - an application of mixed method approach," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    22. Pogue, Sarah J. & Kröbel, Roland & Janzen, H. Henry & Alemu, Aklilu W. & Beauchemin, Karen A. & Little, Shannan & Iravani, Majid & de Souza, Danielle Maia & McAllister, Tim A., 2020. "A social-ecological systems approach for the assessment of ecosystem services from beef production in the Canadian prairie," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6361-:d:822048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.