IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14414-d962301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Development Mechanism in Rural Kindergartens: The Relationships among Enabling Organizational Structure, Kindergarten Directors’ Leadership and Early Childhood Teachers’ Well-Being

Author

Listed:
  • Zhonglian Yan

    (Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Ziqing Wang

    (Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Qingling Meng

    (Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Faculty of Education, Hulunbuir College, Hailar 021008, China)

  • Yujie Wang

    (Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Yunfei Liu

    (Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

Abstract

Kindergarten directors’ leadership, early childhood teachers’ well-being, and enabling organizational structure are important components of ecological development in kindergartens. To understand the relationships among the three, identification of the driving force for the sustainable development of kindergartens in rural China must occur. This study used the Kindergarten Care and Education Leadership Questionnaire, the Enabling Organizational Structure Scale, and the Teacher Well-being Scale as research instruments to explore these relationships in an online survey of rural early childhood teachers (N = 1958, 98.3% female, 23.5% unmarried, 76.5% married, 68.8% county, and 31.2% rural). The study found that the overall levels of rural early childhood teachers’ well-being, director leadership, and enabling organizational structure were all in the medium to high range. There is a two-way effect between director leadership and enabling organizational structure, with kindergarten directors’ leadership positively predicting early childhood teachers’ well-being, but this effect is mainly mediated through the enabling organization. Therefore, to achieve sustainable development in rural kindergartens, emphasis needs to be placed on building an enabling organizational structure based on early childhood teachers’ well-being and kindergarten directors’ leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhonglian Yan & Ziqing Wang & Qingling Meng & Yujie Wang & Yunfei Liu, 2022. "Sustainable Development Mechanism in Rural Kindergartens: The Relationships among Enabling Organizational Structure, Kindergarten Directors’ Leadership and Early Childhood Teachers’ Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14414-:d:962301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14414/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14414/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xinxin Liu & Yong Jiang & Hui Li, 2022. "The Sustainability of Early Childhood Education in Chinese Teachers’ Perspective: Evidence from a National Validation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Xie, Sha & Li, Hui, 2020. "Accessibility, affordability, accountability, sustainability and social justice of early childhood education in China: A case study of Shenzhen," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Kenneth Bollen, 1986. "Sample size and bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit index," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(3), pages 375-377, September.
    4. van der Voet, Joris, 2014. "The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 373-382.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2002. "Trucking Industry Preferences for Driver Traveler Information Using Wireless Internet-enabled Devices," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt40q8h6sf, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Randi Hammervold & Ulf Olsson, 2012. "Testing structural equation models: the impact of error variances in the data generating process," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1547-1570, August.
    3. Yulia A. Seliverstova, 2021. "Early Childhood Education In Russia: The Interrelation Of Income Level And Parental Investment," HSE Working papers WP BRP 61/EDU/2021, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Filstad, Cathrine & Olsen, Trude Høgvold & Karp, Tom, 2021. "Constructing managerial manoeuvring space in contradictory contexts," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 467-475.
    5. Zheng Zhao & Yaoqi Zhang & Yali Wen, 2018. "Residents’ Support Intentions and Behaviors Regarding Urban Trees Programs: A Structural Equation Modeling-Multi Group Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Ogasawara, Haruhiko, 2016. "Bias correction of the Akaike information criterion in factor analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 144-159.
    7. Vos, Janita F.J. & Rupert, Joyce, 2018. "Change agent's contribution to recipients' resistance to change: A two-sided story," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 453-462.
    8. Rekha Rao-Nicholson & Syed Mohyuddin, 2024. "The role of transformational leadership and institutional entrepreneurship in organizational change in Indian public organizations," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 213-236, April.
    9. Natacha Klein & Tomás B. Ramos & Pauline Deutz, 2022. "Factors and strategies for circularity implementation in the public sector: An organisational change management approach for sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 509-523, May.
    10. Ingo Balderjahn, 1988. "A note to Bollen's alternative fit measure," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(2), pages 283-285, June.
    11. Alessandra Fermani & Maria Rita Sergi & Angelo Carrieri & Isabella Crespi & Laura Picconi & Aristide Saggino, 2020. "Sustainable Tourism and Facilities Preferences: The Sustainable Tourist Stay Scale (STSS) Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Ying Tan & Feng Hai & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2022. "Minimizing Waste in the Food Supply Chain: Role of Information System, Supply Chain Strategy, and Network Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Wioleta Kucharska, 2017. "Consumer social network brand identification and personal branding. How do social network users choose among brand sites?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1315879-131, January.
    14. Krzysztof Krukowski & Magdalena Raczynska & Iwona Escher, 2021. "Change Management Success Factors in Polish Public Administration," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 1-16.
    15. Elaine Chepkoskei & Kellen Kiambati & Irura Ng’ang’a, 2021. "Relationship between performance contracting and the implementation of strategic objectives in Kenyan public universities," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(2), pages 170-182, March.
    16. Yu, Wantao & Jacobs, Mark A. & Salisbury, W. David & Enns, Harvey, 2013. "The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: An organizational learning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 346-358.
    17. Herbert Marsh & John Balla, 1994. "Goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis: The effects of sample size and model parsimony," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 185-217, May.
    18. Genevieve Graaf & Evelyn Hengeveld-Bidmon & Sarah Carnochan & Marianna Salomone & Michael J. Austin, 2019. "Change Communication in Public Sector Cutback Management," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 453-472, December.
    19. Alexander Weiss, 1994. "Identifying Sources of Error in Informant Reports," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(5), pages 592-612, October.
    20. Felippe Santos & Rodrigo Lozano & Maria Barreiro-Gen, 2024. "Analysing the drivers for sustainable public procurement," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 966-979, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14414-:d:962301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.