IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12588-d932723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of Sustainable Road Pavements Founded on Clay Subgrades Treated with Eco-Friendly Cementitious Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Y. O. Amakye

    (Department of Engineering, Design and Mathematics, Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK)

  • Samuel J. Abbey

    (Centre for Architecture and Built Environment Research (CABER), Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK)

  • Colin A. Booth

    (Centre for Architecture and Built Environment Research (CABER), Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK)

  • Jonathan Oti

    (School of Engineering, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Science, University of South Wales, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK)

Abstract

Clays encountered during road construction are mostly weak and result in major pavement failures due to their low California bearing ratio (CBR) and high swelling potential. In this study, sustainable and eco-friendly waste materials including brick dust waste (BDW), ground granulated blastfurnance slag (GGBS), recycled plastic (RP) and recycled glass (RG) at varying proportions of 11.75% and 23.5% were used as partial replacement for cement and lime in clay treatment. After determining the water content by conducting Atterberg limit and compaction test, A CBR and swell characteristics of treated and untreated clay were also conducted. A road pavement design was conducted using the Design Manual for Road and Bridges (DMRB) as a guide to determine the performance of treated clay with varying CBR values. A road pavement failure analysis was also conducted to understand the defect formation within pavement structures supported by eco-friendly treated clay. The embodied carbon of treated clay was calculated and a life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of flexible pavement with treated clay and road with imported materials was conducted. The results show a liquid limit of 131.26 and plastic limit of 28.74 for high plasticity index (clay 1) and liquid limit of 274.07 and a plastic limit of 45.38 for extremely high plasticity index (clay 2). An increase in CBR values from 8% and 9% to 57% and 97% with a reduction in swell values from 4.11% and 5.03% to 0.38% and 0.56% were recorded. This resulted in a reduction in pavement thickness and stresses within the road pavement leading to reduced susceptibility of the pavement to fatigue, rutting and permanent deformation. Very low embodied carbon was recorded for eco-friendly treated clay and a high life cycle cost (LCC) with clay removed and replaced with imported materials compared with clay treated using eco-friendly waste materials. The study concluded that carbon and overall construction costs can be reduced using waste materials in road construction. Owners and operators can save money when clay is treated and used in road construction instead of removing clay and replacing it with imported materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Y. O. Amakye & Samuel J. Abbey & Colin A. Booth & Jonathan Oti, 2022. "Performance of Sustainable Road Pavements Founded on Clay Subgrades Treated with Eco-Friendly Cementitious Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12588-:d:932723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12588/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12588/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Filippo G. Praticò & Marinella Giunta & Marina Mistretta & Teresa Maria Gulotta, 2020. "Energy and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainable Pavement Materials and Technologies for Urban Roads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Nicola Baldo & Fabio Rondinella & Fabiola Daneluz & Marco Pasetto, 2022. "Foamed Bitumen Mixtures for Road Construction Made with 100% Waste Materials: A Laboratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Cherdsak Suksiripattanapong & Taweerat Phetprapai & Witawat Singsang & Chayakrit Phetchuay & Jaksada Thumrongvut & Wisitsak Tabyang, 2022. "Utilization of Recycled Plastic Waste in Fiber Reinforced Concrete for Eco-Friendly Footpath and Pavement Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Salisa Chaiyaput & Pimchanok Sertsoongnern & Jiratchaya Ayawanna, 2022. "Utilization of Waste Dust from Asphalt Concrete Manufacturing as a Sustainable Subbase Course Material in Pavement Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Eul-Bum Lee & David K. Thomas & Douglas Alleman, 2018. "Incorporating Road User Costs into Integrated Life-Cycle Cost Analyses for Infrastructure Sustainability: A Case Study on Sr-91 Corridor Improvement Project (Ca)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roman Trach & Victor Moshynskyi & Denys Chernyshev & Oleksandr Borysyuk & Yuliia Trach & Pavlo Striletskyi & Volodymyr Tyvoniuk, 2022. "Modeling the Quantitative Assessment of the Condition of Bridge Components Made of Reinforced Concrete Using ANN," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Altaf & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Amir Mosavi, 2021. "Systematic Review of Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement and a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-38, April.
    2. Ibrahim Hakeem & Md. Akter Hosen & Mana Alyami & Shaker Qaidi & Yasin Özkılıc, 2023. "Influence of Heat–Cool Cyclic Exposure on the Performance of Fiber-Reinforced High-Strength Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Noura Al-Mazrouei & Ali H. Al-Marzouqi & Waleed Ahmed, 2022. "Characterization and Sustainability Potential of Recycling 3D-Printed Nylon Composite Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Mulian Zheng & Wang Chen & Xiaoyan Ding & Wenwu Zhang & Sixin Yu, 2021. "Comprehensive Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Preventive Maintenance Techniques for Asphalt Pavement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Walter Leal Filho & Jelena Barbir & Pınar Gökçin Özuyar & Enrique Nunez & Jose Manuel Diaz-Sarachaga & Bertrand Guillaume & Rosley Anholon & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Julia Swart & Luis Velazquez & The, 2022. "Assessing Provisions and Requirements for the Sustainable Production of Plastics: Towards Achieving SDG 12 from the Consumers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Giusi Perri & Manuel De Rose & Josipa Domitrović & Rosolino Vaiana, 2023. "CO 2 Impact Analysis for Road Embankment Construction: Comparison of Lignin and Lime Soil Stabilization Treatments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Shabir Hussain Khahro & Zubair Ahmed Memon & Lillian Gungat & Muhamad Razuhanafi Mat Yazid & Abdur Rahim & Muhammad Mubaraki & Nur Izzi Md. Yusoff, 2021. "Low-Cost Pavement Management System for Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Diana Eliza Godoi Bizarro & Zoran Steinmann & Isabel Nieuwenhuijse & Elisabeth Keijzer & Mara Hauck, 2021. "Potential Carbon Footprint Reduction for Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Innovations: LCA Methodology, Best Available Technology, and Near-Future Reduction Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Moins, B. & France, C. & Van den bergh, W. & Audenaert, A., 2020. "Implementing life cycle cost analysis in road engineering: A critical review on methodological framework choices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Hayder Abbas Obaid & Tameem Mohammed Hashim & Ahmed Awad Matr Al-Abody & Mohammed Salah Nasr & Ghadeer Haider Abbas & Abdullah Musa Kadhim & Monower Sadique, 2022. "Properties of Modified Warm-Mix Asphalt Mixtures Containing Different Percentages of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-29, October.
    11. Jaksada Thumrongvut & Sittichai Seangatith & Chayakrit Phetchuay & Cherdsak Suksiripattanapong, 2022. "Comparative Experimental Study of Sustainable Reinforced Portland Cement Concrete and Geopolymer Concrete Beams Using Rice Husk Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Bo Peng & Xiaoying Tong & Shijiang Cao & Wenying Li & Gui Xu, 2020. "Carbon Emission Calculation Method and Low-Carbon Technology for Use in Expressway Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Elisabete Nogueira & Sofia Gomes & João M. Lopes, 2023. "Triple Bottom Line, Sustainability, and Economic Development: What Binds Them Together? A Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Taísa Medina & João Luiz Calmon & Darli Vieira & Alencar Bravo & Thalya Vieira, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Road Pavements That Incorporate Waste Reuse: A Systematic Review and Guidelines Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Konstantinos Gkyrtis & Christina Plati & Andreas Loizos, 2023. "Structural Performance of Foamed Asphalt Base in a Full Depth Reclaimed and Sustainable Pavement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Paolo Intini & Nicola Berloco & Pasquale Colonna & Vittorio Ranieri, 2020. "The Impact of Heavy Vehicle Traffic Trends on the Overdesign of Flexible Asphalt Pavements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Abdalrhman Milad & Ali Mohammed Babalghaith & Abdulnaser M. Al-Sabaeei & Anmar Dulaimi & Abdualmtalab Ali & Sajjala Sreedhar Reddy & Munder Bilema & Nur Izzi Md Yusoff, 2022. "A Comparative Review of Hot and Warm Mix Asphalt Technologies from Environmental and Economic Perspectives: Towards a Sustainable Asphalt Pavement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Christina Plati & Maria Tsakoumaki, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Alternative Pavement Rehabilitation Solutions: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    19. Gabriella Buttitta & Gaspare Giancontieri & Tony Parry & Davide Lo Presti, 2023. "Modelling the Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Performance of Maximizing Asphalt Recycling on Road Pavement Surfaces in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-30, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12588-:d:932723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.