IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p11047-d906663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trainers’ Characteristics Affecting Online Training Effectiveness: A Pre-Experiment among Students in a Malaysian Secondary School

Author

Listed:
  • Siti Fardaniah Abdul Aziz

    (Human Development Program, Psychology and Human Well-Being Research Centre, Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, The National University of Malaysia (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Norashikin Hussein

    (Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Nor Azilah Husin

    (Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Universiti Selangor, Shah Alam 40000, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Muhamad Ariff Ibrahim

    (Kulliyyah Allied Health Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan 25200, Pahang, Malaysia)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the implementation of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), especially in the educational system, in which online learning can also be used as online training among school students. Interestingly, prior studies have highlighted trainers’ role as the most important factor affecting online training. However, prior studies that reported the effectiveness of online training among school students and the right trainers’ characteristics to sustain its effectiveness have been very limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine online training effectiveness among 150 students in a Malaysian high school using pre-experimental research. Trainers’ characteristics perceived by participants were also determined and compared between classroom and online training. Findings indicated that online training was significantly effective regardless of gender and race differences; trainers’ characteristics explained 40.5% of variance in online training effectiveness. However, the school students preferred classroom training compared to online training; trainers’ characteristics were better in classroom training. Hence, it can be concluded that online training among school students can be effective; however, the characteristics of trainers can be improved to sustain the effectiveness of online training. These results have implications for the sustainability of effective 4IR in the educational system for the post-pandemic era.

Suggested Citation

  • Siti Fardaniah Abdul Aziz & Norashikin Hussein & Nor Azilah Husin & Muhamad Ariff Ibrahim, 2022. "Trainers’ Characteristics Affecting Online Training Effectiveness: A Pre-Experiment among Students in a Malaysian Secondary School," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11047-:d:906663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11047/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11047/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adriana Grenčíková & Marcel Kordoš & Jozef Bartek & Vladislav Berkovič, 2021. "The Impact of the Industry 4.0 Concept on Slovak Business Sustainability within the Issue of the Pandemic Outbreak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Hsien-Ming Chou & Cheng-Wen Lee & Tsai-Lun Cho, 2022. "The Incorporation of Service-Learning into a Management Course: A Case Study of a Charity Thrift Store," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Xuemei Wu & Zhenzhen He & Mingxi Li & Zhongmei Han & Changqin Huang, 2022. "Identifying Learners’ Interaction Patterns in an Online Learning Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Elli Doukanari & Despo Ktoridou & Leonidas Efthymiou & Epaminondas Epaminonda, 2021. "The Quest for Sustainable Teaching Praxis: Opportunities and Challenges of Multidisciplinary and Multicultural Teamwork," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Szopiński, Tomasz & Bachnik, Katarzyna, 2022. "Student evaluation of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Aldo Gordillo & Enrique Barra & Sonsoles López-Pernas & Juan Quemada, 2021. "Development of Teacher Digital Competence in the Area of E-Safety through Educational Video Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Jeimmy Carrera & Darinka Ramírez-Hernández, 2018. "Innovative Education in MOOC for Sustainability: Learnings and Motivations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Suqi Li & Yuxuan Liu & Yu-Sheng Su, 2022. "Differential Analysis of Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Abilities According to Teaching Stages and Educational Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Lim, Hyochang & Lee, Sang-Gun & Nam, Kichan, 2007. "Validating E-learning factors affecting training effectiveness," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 22-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Proserpio, Luigi & Magni, Massimo, 2012. "Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-105.
    2. Chien-Yu Chen & Shih-Wen Su & Yu-Zhi Lin & Chuen-Tsai Sun, 2023. "The Effect of Time Management and Help-Seeking in Self-Regulation-Based Computational Thinking Learning in Taiwanese Primary School Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Amith Khandakar & Muhammad E. H. Chowdhury & Md. Saifuddin Khalid & Nizar Zorba, 2022. "Case Study of Multi-Course Project-Based Learning and Online Assessment in Electrical Engineering Courses during COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Sandra Ricart & Rubén A. Villar-Navascués & Salvador Gil-Guirado & María Hernández-Hernández & Antonio M. Rico-Amorós & Jorge Olcina-Cantos, 2020. "Could MOOC-Takers’ Behavior Discuss the Meaning of Success-Dropout Rate? Players, Auditors, and Spectators in a Geographical Analysis Course about Natural Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Jiwon Shin & Myengkyo Seo & Yong Kyu Lew, 2022. "Sustainability of Digital Capital and Social Support during COVID-19: Indonesian Muslim Diaspora’s Case in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Sergi, Bruno S. & Ključnikov, Aleksandr & Popkova, Elena G. & Bogoviz, Aleksei V. & Lobova, Svetlana V., 2022. "Creative abilities and digital competencies to transitioning to Business 4.0," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 401-411.
    7. Munirah Ghazali & Vassilios Makrakis & Nelly Kostoulas-Makrakis & Nooraida Yakob & Rabiatul Adawiah Ahmad Rashid & Widad Othman & Nanung Agus Fitriyanto, 2024. "Predicting Teacher’s Information and Communication Technology-Enabled Education for Sustainability Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Tallgauer, Maximilian & Schank, Christoph, 2024. "Challenging the growth-prosperity Nexus: Redefining undergraduate economics education for the Anthropocene," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Bernardo Tabuenca & Marco Kalz & Ansje Löhr, 2019. "Massive Open Online Education for Environmental Activism: The Worldwide Problem of Marine Litter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Andra-Teodora Gorski & Elena-Diana Ranf & Dorel Badea & Elisabeta-Emilia Halmaghi & Hortensia Gorski, 2023. "Education for Sustainability—Some Bibliometric Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Nur Faezah Jamal & Nurhasniza Idham Abu Hasan & Nor Mariyah Abdul Ghafar, 2023. "Students’ Perception Regarding Mode of Learning in the Post COVID-19," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(8), pages 1033-1042, August.
    12. Katerina Zdravkova, 2023. "Personalized Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, April.
    13. Maximilian Tallgauer & Christoph Schank, 2023. "Rethinking Economics Education for Sustainable Development: A Posthumanist Practice Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, June.
    14. Maria-Mar Fernandez-Antolin & José-Manuel del-Río & Fernando del Ama Gonzalo & Roberto-Alonso Gonzalez-Lezcano, 2020. "The Relationship between the Use of Building Performance Simulation Tools by Recent Graduate Architects and the Deficiencies in Architectural Education," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Toda, Armando M. & do Carmo, Ricardo M.C. & da Silva, Alan P. & Bittencourt, Ig I. & Isotani, Seiji, 2019. "An approach for planning and deploying gamification concepts with social networks within educational contexts," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 294-303.
    16. Sunyoung Kim & Taejung Park, 2022. "Analyzing Log Data of Students Who Have Achieved Scores Adjacent to the Minimum Passing Grade for a K-MOOC Completion in the Context of Learning Analytics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Arkadiusz J. Derkacz & Artur Gajda, 2022. "Changes in the Structure of the Apartments Rental Segment in Poland During the COVID-19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 156-166.
    18. Shuai Fan & Jianfeng Jiang & Fei Li & Guoqiang Zeng & Yi Gu & Wentai Guo, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on Postgraduate Teaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Antonius Schröder & Daniel Krüger, 2019. "Social Innovation as a Driver for New Educational Practices: Modernising, Repairing and Transforming the Education System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, February.
    20. Hsiao, Chun Hua & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 128-136.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11047-:d:906663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.