IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241241888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open and Collaborative Innovation for the Social Construction of Learning: Descriptive Analysis of an xMOOC Design

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth-Elizabeth Minga-Vallejo
  • María-Soledad Ramírez-Montoya
  • María-José Rodríguez-Conde

Abstract

In education, technological advances have boosted digital processes that expand training possibilities, such as xMOOCs (eXtended Massive Open Online Courses). The purpose of this study was to analyze the design of the xMOOC in the light of open and collaborative innovation and the social construction of learning. The quantitative method and descriptive statistical analysis were used to analyze the perceptions of eight expert’s MOOC developers based on the results of a Likert scale questionnaire. The results were integrated with a previous study carried out with inferential statistics on 217 xMOOC students. The findings revealed two approaches to innovation to support the social construction of learning and its challenges: (a) design and teaching-learning strategies that integrate social learning activities; (b) learning objectives to strengthen social learning activities through pedagogical and technological innovation. The contribution of this research is to add value to the body of knowledge available to trainers, researchers, and stakeholders in MOOC design, the social construction of learning, and open and collaborative innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth-Elizabeth Minga-Vallejo & María-Soledad Ramírez-Montoya & María-José Rodríguez-Conde, 2024. "Open and Collaborative Innovation for the Social Construction of Learning: Descriptive Analysis of an xMOOC Design," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241241888
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241241888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241241888
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241241888?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liyong Wan & Shoumei Xie & Ai Shu, 2020. "Toward an Understanding of University Students’ Continued Intention to Use MOOCs: When UTAUT Model Meets TTF Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    2. Huashan Wu & Shujuan Luo, 2022. "Integrating MOOCs in an Undergraduate English Course: Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of Blended Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    3. Chao Li & Hong Zhou, 2018. "Enhancing the Efficiency of Massive Online Learning by Integrating Intelligent Analysis into MOOCs with an Application to Education of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Noor Hidayah Che Lah & Zaidatun Tasir & Nurul Farhana Jumaat, 2022. "An Evaluation of the Online Social Learning Environment Instrument (OSLEI) Using Rasch Model Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    5. Bin Zou & Lulu Huang & Wulin Ma & Yuqing Qiu, 2021. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of EFL online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    6. Jeimmy Carrera & Darinka Ramírez-Hernández, 2018. "Innovative Education in MOOC for Sustainability: Learnings and Motivations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Aixia Li & A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam & Xiaoqing Gu, 2021. "Factors Engaging College Students in Online Learning: An Investigation of Learning Stickiness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    8. Nouf Alsuwaida, 2022. "Online Courses in Art and Design During the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: Teaching Reflections From a First-Time Online Instructor," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    9. Bing Mei & Lawrence May & Rena Heap & Damon Ellis & Sue Tickner & Jacqui Thornley & Jamie Denton & Richard Durham, 2021. "Rapid Development Studio: An Intensive, Iterative Approach to Designing Online Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    10. Kolja Oswald & Xiaokang Zhao, 2021. "Collaborative Learning in Makerspaces: A Grounded Theory of the Role of Collaborative Learning in Makerspaces," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    11. Mahdi Mohammed Alamri, 2022. "Investigating Students’ Adoption of MOOCs during COVID-19 Pandemic: Students’ Academic Self-Efficacy, Learning Engagement, and Learning Persistence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Aljawharah M. Aldosari & Hala F. Eid & Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen, 2022. "A Proposed Strategy Based on Instructional Design Models through an LMS to Develop Online Learning in Higher Education Considering the Lockdown Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernardo Tabuenca & Marco Kalz & Ansje Löhr, 2019. "Massive Open Online Education for Environmental Activism: The Worldwide Problem of Marine Litter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Cecilia Temilola Olugbara & Moeketsi Letseka & Oludayo O. Olugbara, 2021. "Multiple Correspondence Analysis of Factors Influencing Student Acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Samer Ali Al-shami & Salem Aldahmani & Massila Kamalrudin & Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammed Al-shami & Mustafa Musa Jaber, 2022. "A Model of Motivational and Technological Factors Influencing Massive Open Online Courses’ Continuous Intention to Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Irdina Farzana Ahmad Shazli & Noor Hidayah Che Lah & Mashitoh Hashim & Ramlah Mailok & Aslina Saad & Suraya Hamid, 2023. "A Comprehensive Study of Students’ Challenges and Perceptions of Emergency Remote Education During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    5. Jesús Maya & Juan F. Luesia & Javier Pérez-Padilla, 2021. "The Relationship between Learning Styles and Academic Performance: Consistency among Multiple Assessment Methods in Psychology and Education Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Serdar Türkeli & Martine Schophuizen, 2019. "Decomposing the Complexity of Value: Integration of Digital Transformation of Education with Circular Economy Transition," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Katerina Zdravkova, 2023. "Personalized Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Maria-Mar Fernandez-Antolin & José-Manuel del-Río & Fernando del Ama Gonzalo & Roberto-Alonso Gonzalez-Lezcano, 2020. "The Relationship between the Use of Building Performance Simulation Tools by Recent Graduate Architects and the Deficiencies in Architectural Education," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Kun Zhang & Haoxian Wu, 2022. "Synchronous Online Learning During COVID-19: Chinese University EFL Students’ Perspectives," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    10. Ling Wang & Gongliang Hu & Tiehua Zhou, 2018. "Semantic Analysis of Learners’ Emotional Tendencies on Online MOOC Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Bassel El Hajj & Georgiana Karadas & Pouya Zargar, 2023. "How E-Government Can Help Societies during a Crisis: Implications of UTAUT Model in Lebanon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Chiou-Jye Huang & Ping-Huan Kuo, 2018. "A Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasting Model by Using Artificial Neural Networks with Stochastic Optimization for Renewable Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Muhammad Imran & Saman Hina & Mirza Mahmood Baig, 2022. "Analysis of Learner’s Sentiments to Evaluate Sustainability of Online Education System during COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Martín Bustamante-León & Paúl Herrera & Luis Domínguez-Granda & Tammy Schellens & Peter L. M. Goethals & Otilia Alejandro & Martin Valcke, 2022. "Toward a More Personalized MOOC: Data Analysis to Identify Drinking Water Production Operators’ Learning Characteristics—An Ecuador Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-31, November.
    15. Faqih, Khaled M.S. & Jaradat, Mohammed-Issa Riad Mousa, 2021. "Integrating TTF and UTAUT2 theories to investigate the adoption of augmented reality technology in education: Perspective from a developing country," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Chen, Yea-Jyh & Smith, Yvonne M. & Stidham, Andrea Warner, 2024. "Faculty Online Teaching Effectiveness Scale (FOTES): Instrument development and content validation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    17. Marco Yamba-Yugsi & Lourdes Atiaja Atiaja & Sergio Luján-Mora & Jose Luis Eguia-Gomez, 2022. "Determinants of the Intention to Use MOOCs as a Complementary Tool: An Observational Study of Ecuadorian Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-11, November.
    18. María José Sosa-Díaz & María Rosa Fernández-Sánchez, 2020. "Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) within the Framework of International Developmental Cooperation as a Strategy to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Sara Calvo & Fergus Lyon & Andrés Morales & Jeremy Wade, 2020. "Educating at Scale for Sustainable Development and Social Enterprise Growth: The Impact of Online Learning and a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Hyo-Jin Kang & Jieun Han & Gyu Hyun Kwon, 2022. "The Acceptance Behavior of Smart Home Health Care Services in South Korea: An Integrated Model of UTAUT and TTF," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241241888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.