IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10326-d892466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Effects of Virtual Reality System Usage on Spatial Perception: The Potential Impacts of Immersive Virtual Reality on Spatial Design Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Sahand Azarby

    (College of Design, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA)

  • Arthur Rice

    (College of Design, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA)

Abstract

The main component of any Virtual Reality (VR) system is the human user. The ways in which a VR system shapes human experience can affect design outcomes. This research explores the differences in spatial perception between an immersive Virtual Reality Interactive Environment (IVRIE) and traditional Virtual Reality (also known as a desktop-based Virtual Reality system, abbreviated herein as the DT system). Spatial perception and the cognition of the spatial factors of virtual spaces were studied based on different features of the two systems, including the sense of immersion, forms of interaction, experience of human scale, and movement through virtual spaces. This study focused on determining how users’ spatial decision making and performance were affected by differences in spatial perception created by the IVRIE and DT systems. Factors examined included the differences between and within the two virtual systems, based on differences in texture, system usage sequence, and the complexity of the experiential/spatial guidelines. Descriptive and inferential statistical testing using quantitative and qualitative data were used to find differences in spatial perception and decision making. The results showed significant space size variations produced by participants between and within the two different VR systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahand Azarby & Arthur Rice, 2022. "Understanding the Effects of Virtual Reality System Usage on Spatial Perception: The Potential Impacts of Immersive Virtual Reality on Spatial Design Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10326-:d:892466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10326/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10326/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Wang & Peng Wu & Jun Wang & Hung-Lin Chi & Xiangyu Wang, 2018. "A Critical Review of the Use of Virtual Reality in Construction Engineering Education and Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Mojtaba Noghabaei & Arsalan Heydarian & Vahid Balali & Kevin Han, 2020. "Trend Analysis on Adoption of Virtual and Augmented Reality in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Industry," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Hugo C. Gómez-Tone & John Bustamante Escapa & Paola Bustamante Escapa & Jorge Martin-Gutierrez, 2021. "The Drawing and Perception of Architectural Spaces through Immersive Virtual Reality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Cao & Giap-Weng Ng & Sha-Sha Ye, 2023. "Design and Evaluation for Immersive Virtual Reality Learning Environment: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Jose Luis Saorin & Carlos Carbonell-Carrera & Allison J. Jaeger & Dámari Melián Díaz, 2023. "Landscape Design Outdoor–Indoor VR Environments User Experience," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Sahand Azarby & Arthur Rice, 2022. "User Performance in Virtual Reality Environments: The Capability of Immersive Virtual Reality Systems in Enhancing User Spatial Awareness and Producing Consistent Design Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sahand Azarby & Arthur Rice, 2022. "User Performance in Virtual Reality Environments: The Capability of Immersive Virtual Reality Systems in Enhancing User Spatial Awareness and Producing Consistent Design Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Gui Ye & Hongzhe Yue & Jingjing Yang & Hongyang Li & Qingting Xiang & Yuan Fu & Can Cui, 2020. "Understanding the Sociocognitive Process of Construction Workers’ Unsafe Behaviors: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-33, March.
    3. Hsiao-Hsien Lin & I.-Yun Chen & Chih-Hung Tseng & Yueh-Shiu Lee & Jao-Chuan Lin, 2022. "A Study of the Impact of River Improvement and Greening on Public Reassurance and the Urban Well-Being Index during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Fernsebner, Hannah, 2023. "Virtual Reality Transforming the Digital Learning Environment: An Analysis of Students' Acceptance," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(4), pages 1081-1099.
    5. Tri Kuncoro & Muhammad Aris Ichwanto & Dzul Fikri Muhammad, 2023. "VR-Based Learning Media of Earthquake-Resistant Construction for Civil Engineering Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Na Chen & Ming Zhao & Kun Gao & Jun Zhao, 2021. "Experimental Study on the Evaluation and Influencing Factors on Individual’s Emergency Escape Capability in Subway Fire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Murielle G. Kluge & Steven Maltby & Angela Keynes & Eugene Nalivaiko & Darrell J. R. Evans & Frederick R. Walker, 2022. "Current State and General Perceptions of the Use of Extended Reality (XR) Technology at the University of Newcastle: Interviews and Surveys From Staff and Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    8. Bilal Manzoor & Idris Othman & Juan Carlos Pomares, 2021. "Digital Technologies in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry—A Bibliometric—Qualitative Literature Review of Research Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Xiangcheng Meng & Huaiyuan Zhai & Alan H. S. Chan, 2019. "Development of Scales to Measure and Analyse the Relationship of Safety Consciousness and Safety Citizenship Behaviour of Construction Workers: An Empirical Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Rachid Belaroussi & Elena Díaz González & Francis Dupin & Jorge Martin-Gutierrez, 2023. "Appraisal of Architectural Ambiances in a Future District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Banus Kam Leung Low & Siu Shing Man & Alan Hoi Shou Chan & Saad Alabdulkarim, 2019. "Construction Worker Risk-Taking Behavior Model with Individual and Organizational Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    12. Mohamed Nour El-Din & João Poças Martins & Nuno M. M. Ramos & Pedro F. Pereira, 2024. "The Role of Blockchain-Secured Digital Twins in Promoting Smart Energy Performance-Based Contracts for Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Gondia, Ahmed & Moussa, Ahmed & Ezzeldin, Mohamed & El-Dakhakhni, Wael, 2023. "Machine learning-based construction site dynamic risk models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    14. Lerato Aghimien & Ntebo Ngcobo & Douglas Aghimien, 2024. "Intelligent Wearable Technologies for Workforce Safety in Built Environment Projects in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Kim, Youngju & Kim, Bumsoo, 2024. "How do the news media, academia, and the public view the metaverse? Evidence from South Korea," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    16. Jiahui Huang & Salmiza Saleh & Yufei Liu, 2021. "A Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 10, May.
    17. Na Chen & Ming Zhao & Kun Gao & Jun Zhao, 2020. "The Physiological Experimental Study on the Effect of Different Color of Safety Signs on a Virtual Subway Fire Escape—An Exploratory Case Study of Zijing Mountain Subway Station," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Emanuele Piaia & Beatrice Turillazzi & Roberto Di Giulio & Rizal Sebastian, 2024. "Advancing the Decarbonization of the Construction Sector: Lifecycle Quality and Performance Assurance of Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Kofi Agyekum & Hayford Pittri & Edward Ayebeng Botchway & Judith Amudjie & Victoria Maame Afriyie Kumah & Jenefailus Nikoi Kotei-Martin & Reindolf Animapauh Oduro, 2022. "Exploring the Current Technologies Essential for Health and Safety in the Ghanaian Construction Industry," Merits, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Robertas Damaševičius & Tatjana Sidekerskienė, 2024. "Virtual Worlds for Learning in Metaverse: A Narrative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-41, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10326-:d:892466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.