IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2484-d505726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Refined Kano’s Model to Shoe Production and Consumer Satisfaction Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Chi-Hung Lo

    (Department of Industrial Design, Tunghai University, Taichung 407224, Taiwan)

Abstract

Many industries are labor-intensive and energy- and resource-consuming. A sustainable development plan is necessary for the industries as industrial structures have been changing recently. Taiwan’s shoe industry also has experienced such changes and requires a sustainable product development plan for continuous development. Therefore, this study aims to propose a new method by introducing a model of sustainable product development to facilitate the sustainable development of the industry. By taking air-cushioned casual shoe production as an example, this study suggested the refined Kano quality model for exploring the product attributes that improved the customers’ satisfaction. The refined Kano model that was established with interviews and questionnaire surveys was effective to define the product attributes that contributed to satisfying the customers and understanding their perception of product attributes. In the air-cushioned casual shoe production, the model found function, design, innovation, marketing, and service to be important for manufacturers to develop products with limited. It also suggested the priority be put on the attributes of high value-added quality, key quality, and potential quality. The model helped manufacturers decide which product attributes they need to invest in and develop. The relation of product attributes and consumer satisfaction for a sustainable product development model was also found by using the refined Kano model. The result of this study is expected to apply to various industries for establishing an appropriate sustainable product development model.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi-Hung Lo, 2021. "Application of Refined Kano’s Model to Shoe Production and Consumer Satisfaction Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2484-:d:505726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2484/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2484/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huiskonen, Janne & Pirttila, Timo, 1998. "Sharpening logistics customer service strategy planning by applying Kano's quality element classification," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 253-260, September.
    2. Hyejong Min & Junghwan Yun & Youngjung Geum, 2018. "Analyzing Dynamic Change in Customer Requirements: An Approach Using Review-Based Kano Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Ting-Jui Lu & Yi-Kai Juan, 2019. "Applying Kano Two-Dimensional Quality Model to Build the Performance Evaluation Indicators of Long-Life High-Quality Condominiums," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Jui-Che Tu & Cheng-Hsueh Yang, 2019. "Consumer Needs for Hand-Touch Product Designs Based on the Experience Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Jiacong Wu & Yu Wang & Ru Zhang & Jing Cai, 2018. "An Approach to Discovering Product/Service Improvement Priorities: Using Dynamic Importance-Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zehang Xie & Wu Li & Yunxiang Xie & Lingbo Wang, 2024. "Demand and satisfaction analysis of short health videos among Chinese urban youth: A mixed-methods study based on the KANO model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaolun Wang & Xinlin Yao, 2020. "Fueling Pro-Environmental Behaviors with Gamification Design: Identifying Key Elements in Ant Forest with the Kano Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Xuan Gong & Yunchan Zhu & Rizwan Ali & Ruijin Guo, 2019. "Capturing Associations and Sustainable Competitiveness of Brands from Social Tags," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Junegak Joung & Kiwook Jung & Sanghyun Ko & Kwangsoo Kim, 2018. "Customer Complaints Analysis Using Text Mining and Outcome-Driven Innovation Method for Market-Oriented Product Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Tai-Shan Lee & Ching-Hsin Wang & Chun-Min Yu, 2019. "Fuzzy Evaluation Model for Enhancing E-Learning Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Lee, Ching-Hung & Li, Li & Li, Fan & Chen, Chun-Hsien, 2022. "Requirement-driven evolution and strategy-enabled service design for new customized quick-response product order fulfillment process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Hanyang Luo & Wugang Song & Wanhua Zhou & Xudong Lin & Sumin Yu, 2023. "An Analysis Framework to Reveal Automobile Users’ Preferences from Online User-Generated Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-29, September.
    7. Mingyuan Li & Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Min Yu & Chun-Ming Yang, 2021. "A Fuzzy Evaluation Decision Model for the Ratio Operating Performance Index," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Teen-Hang Meen & Charles Tijus & Jui-Che Tu, 2019. "Selected Papers from the Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Hyejong Min & Junghwan Yun & Youngjung Geum, 2018. "Analyzing Dynamic Change in Customer Requirements: An Approach Using Review-Based Kano Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Michal Pohludka & Hana Štverková, 2019. "The Best Practice of CRM Implementation for Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Chen, Chun-Chih & Chuang, Ming-Chuen, 2008. "Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 667-681, August.
    12. Teng-Chiao Lin & Hsing-Hui Chen & Kuen-Suan Chen & Yen-Po Chen & Shao-Hsun Chang, 2023. "Decision-Making Model of Performance Evaluation Matrix Based on Upper Confidence Limits," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-11, August.
    13. Lifeng He & Dongmei Han & Xiaohang Zhou & Zheng Qu, 2020. "The Voice of Drug Consumers: Online Textual Review Analysis Using Structural Topic Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Kuen-Suan Chen & Chang-Hsien Hsu & Ting-Hsin Hsu, 2021. "Attribute Service Performance Index Based on Poisson Process," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Chun-Hung Yu & Chin-Chia Liu & Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Min Yu, 2020. "Constructing Fuzzy Hypothesis Methods to Determine Critical-To-Quality Service Items," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Elina Dace & Agnis Stibe & Lelde Timma, 2020. "A holistic approach to manage environmental quality by using the Kano model and social cognitive theory," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 430-443, March.
    17. Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo & James J. H. Liou, 2020. "A Combination of DEMATEL and BWM-Based ANP Methods for Exploring the Green Building Rating System in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2484-:d:505726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.