IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3648-d361610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Voice of Drug Consumers: Online Textual Review Analysis Using Structural Topic Model

Author

Listed:
  • Lifeng He

    (School of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, No.777 Guoding Road, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Dongmei Han

    (School of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, No.777 Guoding Road, Shanghai 200433, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Financial Information Technology, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, No.777 Guoding Road, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Xiaohang Zhou

    (School of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, No.777 Guoding Road, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Zheng Qu

    (School of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, No.777 Guoding Road, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Many web-based pharmaceutical e-commerce platforms allow consumers to post open-ended textual reviews based on their purchase experiences. Understanding the true voice of consumers by analyzing such a large amount of user-generated content is of great significance to pharmaceutical manufacturers and e-commerce websites. The aim of this paper is to automatically extract hidden topics from web-based drug reviews using the structural topic model (STM) to examine consumers’ concerns when they buy drugs online. The STM is a probabilistic extension of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), which allows the consolidation of document-level covariates. This innovation allows us to capture consumer dissatisfaction along with their dynamics over time. We extract 12 topics, and five of them are negative topics representing consumer dissatisfaction, whose appearances in the negative reviews are substantially higher than those in the positive reviews. We also come to the conclusion that the prevalence of these five negative topics has not decreased over time. Furthermore, our results reveal that the prevalence of price-related topics has decreased significantly in positive reviews, which indicates that low-price strategies are becoming less attractive to customers. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first study using STM to analyze the unstructured textual data of drug reviews, which enhances the understanding of the aspects of drug consumer concerns and contributes to the research of pharmaceutical e-commerce literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Lifeng He & Dongmei Han & Xiaohang Zhou & Zheng Qu, 2020. "The Voice of Drug Consumers: Online Textual Review Analysis Using Structural Topic Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3648-:d:361610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shawn Mankad & Hyunjeong Spring Han & Joel Goh & Srinagesh Gavirneni, 2016. "Understanding Online Hotel Reviews Through Automated Text Analysis," Post-Print hal-02311939, HAL.
    2. Papathanassis, Alexis & Knolle, Friederike, 2011. "Exploring the adoption and processing of online holiday reviews: A grounded theory approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 215-224.
    3. Yang Liu & Jian-Wu Bi & Zhi-Ping Fan, 2017. "A Method for Ranking Products Through Online Reviews Based on Sentiment Classification and Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1497-1522, November.
    4. Jiacong Wu & Yu Wang & Ru Zhang & Jing Cai, 2018. "An Approach to Discovering Product/Service Improvement Priorities: Using Dynamic Importance-Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Banerjee, Snehasish & Chua, Alton Y.K., 2016. "In search of patterns among travellers' hotel ratings in TripAdvisor," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 125-131.
    6. Susan F. Lu & Huaxia Rui, 2018. "Can We Trust Online Physician Ratings? Evidence from Cardiac Surgeons in Florida," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2557-2573, June.
    7. Margaret E. Roberts & Brandon M. Stewart & Edoardo M. Airoldi, 2016. "A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(515), pages 988-1003, July.
    8. Dezhi Yin & Sabyasachi Mitra & Han Zhang, 2016. "Research Note—When Do Consumers Value Positive vs. Negative Reviews? An Empirical Investigation of Confirmation Bias in Online Word of Mouth," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 131-144, March.
    9. Ian Sutherland & Youngseok Sim & Seul Ki Lee & Jaemun Byun & Kiattipoom Kiatkawsin, 2020. "Topic Modeling of Online Accommodation Reviews via Latent Dirichlet Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Guo, Yue & Barnes, Stuart J. & Jia, Qiong, 2017. "Mining meaning from online ratings and reviews: Tourist satisfaction analysis using latent dirichlet allocation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 467-483.
    11. Nan Jing & Tao Jiang & Juan Du & Vijayan Sugumaran, 2018. "Personalized recommendation based on customer preference mining and sentiment assessment from a Chinese e-commerce website," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 159-179, March.
    12. Donghua Chen & Runtong Zhang & Kecheng Liu & Lei Hou, 2018. "Knowledge Discovery from Posts in Online Health Communities Using Unified Medical Language System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Iacus, Stefano M. & King, Gary & Porro, Giuseppe, 2012. "Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruheng Yin & Rui Tian & Jing Wu & Feng Gan, 2022. "Exploring the Factors Associated with Mental Health Attitude in China: A Structural Topic Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Sumeet Sahay & Hemant Kumar Kaushik & Shikha Singh, 2023. "Discovering themes and trends in electricity supply chain area research," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(3), pages 1525-1560, September.
    3. Oetzel, Sebastian & Graf, Denise, 2023. "Fragen oder Zuhören? Ein Vergleich von Kundenbefragungen und User Generated Content," PraxisWISSEN Marketing: German Journal of Marketing, AfM – Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Marketing, vol. 8(01/2023), pages 91-107.
    4. Zhao, Qingli & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Sun, Minghe, 2024. "Sales mode selection and blockchain technology adoption decisions in a platform supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    5. Tao Shu & Zhiyi Wang & Huading Jia & Wenjin Zhao & Jixian Zhou & Tao Peng, 2022. "Consumers’ Opinions towards Public Health Effects of Online Games: An Empirical Study Based on Social Media Comments in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zajadacz Alina & Minkwitz Aleksandra, 2020. "Using Social Media Data to Plan for Tourism," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(3), pages 125-138, September.
    2. Fan Zou & Yupeng Li & Jiahuan Huang, 2022. "Group interaction and evolution of customer reviews based on opinion dynamics towards product redesign," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1131-1151, December.
    3. Mohamed M. Mostafa, 2023. "A one-hundred-year structural topic modeling analysis of the knowledge structure of international management research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3905-3935, August.
    4. Ian Sutherland & Kiattipoom Kiatkawsin, 2020. "Determinants of Guest Experience in Airbnb: A Topic Modeling Approach Using LDA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Sunyoung Hlee & Hanna Lee & Chulmo Koo, 2018. "Hospitality and Tourism Online Review Research: A Systematic Analysis and Heuristic-Systematic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Ahani, Ali & Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Yadegaridehkordi, Elaheh & Sanzogni, Louis & Tarik, A. Rashid & Knox, Kathy & Samad, Sarminah & Ibrahim, Othman, 2019. "Revealing customers’ satisfaction and preferences through online review analysis: The case of Canary Islands hotels," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 331-343.
    7. Eunhye Park & Junehee Kwon & Bongsug (Kevin) Chae & Sung-Bum Kim, 2021. "What Are the Salient and Memorable Green-Restaurant Attributes? Capturing Customer Perceptions From User-Generated Content," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    8. Ziye Shang & Jian Ming Luo, 2022. "Topic Modeling for Hiking Trail Online Reviews: Analysis of the Mutianyu Great Wall," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Woohyuk Kim & Sung-Bum Kim & Eunhye Park, 2021. "Mapping Tourists’ Destination (Dis)Satisfaction Attributes with User-Generated Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Zhanfei Lei & Dezhi Yin & Sabyasachi Mitra & Han Zhang, 2022. "Swayed by the reviews: Disentangling the effects of average ratings and individual reviews in online word‐of‐mouth," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2393-2411, June.
    11. Susan (Sixue) Jia, 2021. "Analyzing Restaurant Customers’ Evolution of Dining Patterns and Satisfaction during COVID-19 for Sustainable Business Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    12. Kolomoyets, Yuliya & Dickinger, Astrid, 2023. "Understanding value perceptions and propositions: A machine learning approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Zhang, Chenxi & Xu, Zeshui, 2024. "Gaining insights for service improvement through unstructured text from online reviews," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. Chaoran Li & E. Zhang & Jingti Han, 2020. "Exploring the Effect of Market Conditions on Price Premiums in the Online Health Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    15. Nguyen The Hien & Yen-Lun Su & Raksmey Sann & Le Thi Phuong Thanh, 2022. "Analysis of Online Customer Complaint Behavior in Vietnam’s Hotel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Xiaobin Zhang & Hak-Seon Kim, 2021. "Customer Experience and Satisfaction of Disneyland Hotel through Big Data Analysis of Online Customer Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Seungju Nam & Hyun Cheol Lee, 2019. "A Text Analytics-Based Importance Performance Analysis and Its Application to Airline Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Emaad Manzoor & George H. Chen & Dokyun Lee & Michael D. Smith, 2020. "Influence via Ethos: On the Persuasive Power of Reputation in Deliberation Online," Papers 2006.00707, arXiv.org.
    19. Xin Zhang & Jiaming Liu & He Zhu & Zongcai Huang & Shuying Zhang & Ping Li, 2021. "A Comparative Study of Customer Perceptions of Urban and Rural Bed and Breakfasts in Beijing: An Analysis of Online Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Gobinda Roy & Biplab Datta & Rituparna Basu, 2017. "Effect of eWOM Valence on Online Retail Sales," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(1), pages 198-209, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3648-:d:361610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.