IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1866-d496100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influencing Factors of the Mineral Carbonation Process of Iron Ore Mining Waste in Sequestering Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide

Author

Listed:
  • Noor Allesya Alis Ramli

    (Department of Environment, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Faradiella Mohd Kusin

    (Department of Environment, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
    Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP), University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Verma Loretta M. Molahid

    (Department of Environment, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

Abstract

Mining waste may contain potential minerals that can act as essential feedstock for long-term carbon sequestration through a mineral carbonation process. This study attempts to identify the mineralogical and chemical composition of iron ore mining waste alongside the effects of particle size, temperature, and pH on carbonation efficiency. The samples were found to be alkaline in nature (pH of 6.9–7.5) and contained small-sized particles of clay and silt, thus indicating their suitability for mineral carbonation reactions. Samples were composed of important silicate minerals needed for the formation of carbonates such as wollastonite, anorthite, diopside, perovskite, johannsenite, and magnesium aluminum silicate, and the Fe-bearing mineral magnetite. The presence of Fe 2 O 3 (39.6–62.9%) and CaO (7.2–15.2%) indicated the potential of the waste to sequester carbon dioxide because these oxides are important divalent cations for mineral carbonation. The use of small-sized mine-waste particles enables the enhancement of carbonation efficiency, i.e., particles of <38 µm showed a greater extent of Fe and Ca carbonation efficiency (between 1.6–6.7%) compared to particles of <63 µm (0.9–5.7%) and 75 µm (0.7–6.0%). Increasing the reaction temperature from 80 °C to 150–200 °C resulted in a higher Fe and Ca carbonation efficiency of some samples between 0.9–5.8% and 0.8–4.0%, respectively. The effect of increasing the pH from 8–12 was notably observed in Fe carbonation efficiency of between 0.7–5.9% (pH 12) compared to 0.6–3.3% (pH 8). Ca carbonation efficiency was moderately observed (0.7–5.5%) as with the increasing pH between 8–10. Therefore, it has been evidenced that mineralogical and chemical composition were of great importance for the mineral carbonation process, and that the effects of particle size, pH, and temperature of iron mining waste were influential in determining carbonation efficiency. Findings would be beneficial for sustaining the mining industry while taking into account the issue of waste production in tackling the global carbon emission concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Noor Allesya Alis Ramli & Faradiella Mohd Kusin & Verma Loretta M. Molahid, 2021. "Influencing Factors of the Mineral Carbonation Process of Iron Ore Mining Waste in Sequestering Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1866-:d:496100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1866/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1866/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kakizawa, M. & Yamasaki, A. & Yanagisawa, Y., 2001. "A new CO2 disposal process via artificial weathering of calcium silicate accelerated by acetic acid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 341-354.
    2. Teir, Sebastian & Eloneva, Sanni & Fogelholm, Carl-Johan & Zevenhoven, Ron, 2007. "Dissolution of steelmaking slags in acetic acid for precipitated calcium carbonate production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 528-539.
    3. Han, Sang-Jun & Im, Hye Jin & Wee, Jung-Ho, 2015. "Leaching and indirect mineral carbonation performance of coal fly ash-water solution system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 274-282.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naraharisetti, Pavan Kumar & Yeo, Tze Yuen & Bu, Jie, 2019. "New classification of CO2 mineralization processes and economic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 220-233.
    2. Sanna, Aimaro & Dri, Marco & Hall, Matthew R. & Maroto-Valer, Mercedes, 2012. "Waste materials for carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM) – A UK perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 545-554.
    3. Hosseini, Tahereh & Haque, Nawshad & Selomulya, Cordelia & Zhang, Lian, 2016. "Mineral carbonation of Victorian brown coal fly ash using regenerative ammonium chloride – Process simulation and techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 54-68.
    4. Enze Ren & Siyang Tang & Changjun Liu & Hairong Yue & Chun Li & Bin Liang, 2020. "Carbon dioxide mineralization for the disposition of blast‐furnace slag: reaction intensification using NaCl solutions," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(2), pages 436-448, April.
    5. Natalia Czaplicka & Donata Konopacka-Łyskawa, 2020. "Utilization of Gaseous Carbon Dioxide and Industrial Ca-Rich Waste for Calcium Carbonate Precipitation: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Bernard Jomari B. Razote & Mark Kenneth M. Maranan & Ramon Christian P. Eusebio & Richard D. Alorro & Arnel B. Beltran & Aileen H. Orbecido, 2019. "Determination of the Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Potential of a Nickel Mine Mixed Dump through Leaching Tests," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Said, Arshe & Mattila, Hannu-Petteri & Järvinen, Mika & Zevenhoven, Ron, 2013. "Production of precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) from steelmaking slag for fixation of CO2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 765-771.
    8. Zhang, Huining & Gao, Chong & Chen, Ben & Tang, Jiang & He, Dongfeng & Xu, Anjun, 2018. "Stainless steel tailings accelerated direct carbonation process at low pressure: Carbonation efficiency evaluation and chromium leaching inhibition correlation analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 772-781.
    9. Zdeb, Janusz & Howaniec, Natalia & Smoliński, Adam, 2023. "Experimental study on combined valorization of bituminous coal derived fluidized bed fly ash and carbon dioxide from energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    10. Ren, Shan & Aldahri, Tahani & Liu, Weizao & Liang, Bin, 2021. "CO2 mineral sequestration by using blast furnace slag: From batch to continuous experiments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Jun-Hwan Bang & Seung-Woo Lee & Chiwan Jeon & Sangwon Park & Kyungsun Song & Whan Joo Jo & Soochun Chae, 2016. "Leaching of Metal Ions from Blast Furnace Slag by Using Aqua Regia for CO 2 Mineralization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Said, Arshe & Laukkanen, Timo & Järvinen, Mika, 2016. "Pilot-scale experimental work on carbon dioxide sequestration using steelmaking slag," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 602-611.
    13. Ukwattage, N.L. & Ranjith, P.G. & Wang, S.H., 2013. "Investigation of the potential of coal combustion fly ash for mineral sequestration of CO2 by accelerated carbonation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 230-236.
    14. Eloneva, Sanni & Said, Arshe & Fogelholm, Carl-Johan & Zevenhoven, Ron, 2012. "Preliminary assessment of a method utilizing carbon dioxide and steelmaking slags to produce precipitated calcium carbonate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 329-334.
    15. Lombardi, Lidia & Carnevale, Ennio, 2013. "Economic evaluations of an innovative biogas upgrading method with CO2 storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 88-94.
    16. Lombardi, L. & Carnevale, E.A., 2016. "Analysis of an innovative process for landfill gas quality improvement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1107-1117.
    17. Paulina Rusanowska & Marcin Zieliński & Marcin Dębowski, 2023. "Removal of CO 2 from Biogas during Mineral Carbonation with Waste Materials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-10, April.
    18. Mihee Lim & Gi-Chun Han & Ji-Whan Ahn & Kwang-Suk You, 2010. "Environmental Remediation and Conversion of Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) into Useful Green Products by Accelerated Carbonation Technology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, January.
    19. Lee, Myung gyu & Jang, Young Nam & Ryu, Kyung won & Kim, Wonbeak & Bang, Jun-Hwan, 2012. "Mineral carbonation of flue gas desulfurization gypsum for CO2 sequestration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 370-377.
    20. Quader, M. Abdul & Ahmed, Shamsuddin & Ghazilla, Raja Ariffin Raja & Ahmed, Shameem & Dahari, Mahidzal, 2015. "A comprehensive review on energy efficient CO2 breakthrough technologies for sustainable green iron and steel manufacturing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 594-614.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1866-:d:496100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.