IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12589-d679359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government Data Performance: The Roles of Technology, Government Capacity, and Globalization through the Effects of National Innovativeness

Author

Listed:
  • Seunghwan Myeong

    (Department of Public Administration, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Michael J. Ahn

    (Department of Public Policy and Public Affairs, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA)

  • Younhee Kim

    (School of Public Affairs, Pennsylvania State University Harrisburg, Middletown, PA 17057, USA)

  • Shengli Chu

    (Department of Public Policy and Public Affairs, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA)

  • Woojong Suh

    (Department of Business Administration, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

Abstract

The availability of open, relevant, and up-to-date public data is becoming an increasingly important dimension of national competitiveness and sustainable development. It serves as a foundation for novel technologies, such as big data analytics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence, to take root and flourish, and it can help improve the quality and efficiency of government decision making and render governments more transparent and accessible to the public. Often referred as Open Government Data, or OGD, governments around the world have committed resources to constructing various OGD platforms. However, building a robust and effective OGD system has proved difficult, as the promise of OGD has not been realized fully around the world. At this important juncture, this study aims to explore the relationship between national technological and organizational capacities and environmental factor and the quality of OGD systems. In addition, national innovativeness and the degree of “globalization” in a country and their moderating effects between the predictors and OGD performance are examined. Our findings indicate strong positive effects of national technological capacity, government organization capacity, and globalization on OGD quality and a positive moderating effect of national innovativeness.

Suggested Citation

  • Seunghwan Myeong & Michael J. Ahn & Younhee Kim & Shengli Chu & Woojong Suh, 2021. "Government Data Performance: The Roles of Technology, Government Capacity, and Globalization through the Effects of National Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12589-:d:679359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12589/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12589/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fariborz Damanpour & Richard M. Walker & Claudia N. Avellaneda, 2009. "Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 650-675, June.
    2. Barbara Ubaldi, 2013. "Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 22, OECD Publishing.
    3. Hongbo Jiang & Qigan Shao & James J.H. Liou & Ting Shao & Xiaosheng Shi, 2019. "Improving the Sustainability of Open Government Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, April.
    4. Braganza, Ashley & Brooks, Laurence & Nepelski, Daniel & Ali, Maged & Moro, Russ, 2017. "Resource management in big data initiatives: Processes and dynamic capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 328-337.
    5. Charles R. Shipan & Craig Volden, 2008. "The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(4), pages 840-857, October.
    6. Xiguang Cao & Min Deng & Fei Song & Shihu Zhong & Junhao Zhu, 2019. "Direct and moderating effects of environmental regulation intensity on enterprise technological innovation: The case of China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Berliner, Daniel & Erlich, Aaron, 2015. "Competing for Transparency: Political Competition and Institutional Reform in Mexican States," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 109(1), pages 110-128, February.
    8. Hafizh Rafizal Adnan & Achmad Nizar Hidayanto & Sherah Kurnia, 2021. "Citizens’ or Government’s Will? Exploration of Why Indonesia’s Local Governments Adopt Technologies for Open Government," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Pusp Raj Joshi & Shareeful Islam, 2018. "E-Government Maturity Model for Sustainable E-Government Services from the Perspective of Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, June.
    10. Liang Ma, 2014. "Diffusion and Assimilation of Government Microblogging: Evidence from Chinese cities," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 274-295, February.
    11. Berry, Frances Stokes & Berry, William D., 1990. "State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(2), pages 395-415, June.
    12. Hyungjun Seo & Seunghwan Myeong, 2021. "Determinant Factors for Adoption of Government as a Platform in South Korea: Mediating Effects on the Perception of Intelligent Information Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Bernd W. Wirtz & Robert Piehler & Marc-Julian Thomas & Peter Daiser, 2016. "Resistance of Public Personnel to Open Government: A cognitive theory view of implementation barriers towards open government data," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 1335-1364, October.
    14. Eun G. Park, 2021. "How to Improve Government Openness for Sustainable Development: The Interaction of Four Factors in African Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Christopher J. Robertson & Andrew Watson, 2004. "Corruption and change: the impact of foreign direct investment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 385-396, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ibrahim Mutambik & John Lee & Abdullah Almuqrin & Justin Zuopeng Zhang, 2023. "Transitioning to Smart Cities in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: The Role of Leadership and Organisational Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Ibrahim Mutambik & Abdullah Almuqrin & John Lee & Jeffrey Gauthier & Abdullah Homadi, 2022. "Open Government Data in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: An Analysis of Progress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Hao & Su, Jun & Ma, Liang, 2021. "The diffusion of the utility tunnel policy: Evidence from Chinese cities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Amy Y. Li, 2017. "Covet Thy Neighbor or “Reverse Policy Diffusion”? State Adoption of Performance Funding 2.0," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(7), pages 746-771, November.
    3. Felix Strebel & Thomas Widmer, 2012. "Visibility and facticity in policy diffusion: going beyond the prevailing binarity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(4), pages 385-398, December.
    4. Xiaohan Li & Yang Lv & Md Nazirul Islam Sarker & Xun Zeng, 2022. "Assessment of Critical Diffusion Factors of Public–Private Partnership and Social Policy: Evidence from Mainland Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Weixing Liu & Hongtao Yi, 2020. "What Affects the Diffusion of New Energy Vehicles Financial Subsidy Policy? Evidence from Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Armin Mertens & Christine Trampusch & Florian Fastenrath & Rebecca Wangemann, 2021. "The political economy of local government financialization and the role of policy diffusion," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 370-387, April.
    7. Strebel, Felix, 2011. "Inter-governmental institutions as promoters of energy policy diffusion in a federal setting," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 467-476, January.
    8. Michael Olabisi, 2019. "Bridging the enforcement gap in international trade: Participation in the New York Convention on arbitration," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(1), pages 86-109, March.
    9. Youlang Zhang & Hongshan Yang, 2023. "Bureaucratic politics, innovation compatibility, and the dynamic diffusion of subnational decentralization reforms in China," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(4), pages 553-572, July.
    10. Fabrizio Gilardi, 2010. "Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 650-666, July.
    11. Biao Huang & Jiebing Wu & Li Ye, 2023. "Fiscal decentralization, intergovernmental mobility, and the innovativeness of local governments' policy response in COVID‐19: Evidence from China," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(2), pages 196-206, May.
    12. Schneider, Andrea, 2017. "Policy diffusion and the competition for mobile resources," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168203, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    13. Anderson, John E. & Giertz, Seth H. & Shimul, Shafiun N., 2022. "Reducing property taxes for agriculture: Diffusion of use-value assessment policy across the United States," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Jolley, G. Jason, 2023. "The Political Economy of Local Government Enterprise Zone Designation," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), September.
    15. Evan M. Mistur & John Wagner Givens & Daniel C. Matisoff, 2023. "Contagious COVID‐19 policies: Policy diffusion during times of crisis," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(1), pages 36-62, January.
    16. Pranpreya Sriwannawit & Ulf Sandström, 2015. "Large-scale bibliometric review of diffusion research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1615-1645, February.
    17. Peter John, 2018. "Theories of policy change and variation reconsidered: a prospectus for the political economy of public policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(1), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Patrik Marier, 2017. "The politics of policy adoption: a saga on the difficulties of enacting policy diffusion or transfer across industrialized countries," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(3), pages 427-448, September.
    19. Derek Glasgow & Shuang Zhao & Saatvika Rai, 2021. "Rethinking Climate Change Leadership: An Analysis of the Ambitiousness of State GHG Targets," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(4), pages 398-426, July.
    20. Steven J. Balla & Zhoudan Xie, 2023. "The durability of governance reform: A two‐wave audit of notice and comment policymaking in China," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 549-569, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12589-:d:679359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.