IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12540-d678241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Quantitative Approach of Subway Station Passengers’ Heterogeneity of Decision Preference Considering Personality Traits during Emergency Evacuation

Author

Listed:
  • Heng Wang

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Zehao Jiang

    (Department of Construction Management, School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Tiandong Xu

    (College of Design, Construction and Planning, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
    Urban Transport Institute, China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Feng Li

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Subway station emergencies are gradually increasing in China. The aim of this research is to study the effects of “Dist”, “Pedestrian flow” and “Crowd density” on the heterogeneity of passengers’ decision-making preference and explore the relationship between heterogeneity and personality. Firstly, a questionnaire of 20 emergency evacuation scenarios, that includes the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, is designed. Secondly, the heterogeneity of passengers’ decision preference is quantified by the random parameter logit model. Finally, personality traits and influencing factors are used as abscissa and ordinate respectively, to study the relationship between personality traits and preference heterogeneity. The results show that the coefficients of “Dist”, “Pedestrian flow” and “Crowd density” are −0.101, 0.236 and −0.442 respectively, which are statistically significant. The proportion of extroverted passengers of the exit is 9% higher than that of introverted passengers when “Pedestrian flow” of the exit is greater than the average value, while the proportion of introverted passengers is 7% higher than that of extroverted passengers when “Crowd density” is smaller than the average value. The conclusion is that the three influence factors are random variables, and “Dist” shows the lowest level of heterogeneity. Extroverted passengers are more likely to follow a large crowd for evacuation, but introverted passengers are more likely to avoid crowded exits.

Suggested Citation

  • Heng Wang & Zehao Jiang & Tiandong Xu & Feng Li, 2021. "A Quantitative Approach of Subway Station Passengers’ Heterogeneity of Decision Preference Considering Personality Traits during Emergency Evacuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12540-:d:678241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12540/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12540/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Helbing & Lubos Buzna & Anders Johansson & Torsten Werner, 2005. "Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Antonini, Gianluca & Bierlaire, Michel & Weber, Mats, 2006. "Discrete choice models of pedestrian walking behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 667-687, September.
    3. Dirk Helbing & Illés Farkas & Tamás Vicsek, 2000. "Simulating dynamical features of escape panic," Nature, Nature, vol. 407(6803), pages 487-490, September.
    4. Cao, Bao-gui, 2015. "A new car-following model considering driver’s sensory memory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 427(C), pages 218-225.
    5. Hoogendoorn, S. P. & Bovy, P. H. L., 2004. "Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 169-190, February.
    6. Train, Kenneth & Wilson, Wesley W., 2008. "Estimation on stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 191-203, March.
    7. Daniel McFadden & Kenneth Train, 2000. "Mixed MNL models for discrete response," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 447-470.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vasileios Cheimaras & Athanasios Trigkas & Panagiotis Papageorgas & Dimitrios Piromalis & Emmanouil Sofianopoulos, 2022. "A Low-Cost Open-Source Architecture for a Digital Signage Emergency Evacuation System for Cruise Ships, Based on IoT and LTE/4G Technologies," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ziyou Gao & Yunchao Qu & Xingang Li & Jiancheng Long & Hai-Jun Huang, 2014. "Simulating the Dynamic Escape Process in Large Public Places," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1344-1357, December.
    2. Hänseler, Flurin S. & Bierlaire, Michel & Farooq, Bilal & Mühlematter, Thomas, 2014. "A macroscopic loading model for time-varying pedestrian flows in public walking areas," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 60-80.
    3. Li, Maosheng & Shu, Panpan & Xiao, Yao & Wang, Pu, 2021. "Modeling detour decision combined the tactical and operational layer based on perceived density," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 574(C).
    4. Dirk Helbing & Pratik Mukerji, "undated". "Crowd Disasters as Systemic Failures: Analysis of the Love Parade Disaster," Working Papers ETH-RC-12-010, ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design.
    5. Mohammed Mahmod Shuaib, 2016. "Modeling the Pedestrian Ability of Detecting Lanes and Lane Changing Behavior," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(7), pages 1-1, July.
    6. Xiao, Yao & Yang, Mofeng & Zhu, Zheng & Yang, Hai & Zhang, Lei & Ghader, Sepehr, 2021. "Modeling indoor-level non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pedestrian dynamics-based microscopic simulation approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 12-23.
    7. Milad Haghani & Majid Sarvi & Zahra Shahhoseini & Maik Boltes, 2016. "How Simple Hypothetical-Choice Experiments Can Be Utilized to Learn Humans’ Navigational Escape Decisions in Emergencies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Abdelghany, Ahmed & Abdelghany, Khaled & Mahmassani, Hani, 2016. "A hybrid simulation-assignment modeling framework for crowd dynamics in large-scale pedestrian facilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 159-176.
    9. Qingyan Ning & Maosheng Li, 2022. "Modeling Pedestrian Detour Behavior By-Passing Conflict Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid & Shahhoseini, Zahra, 2019. "When ‘push’ does not come to ‘shove’: Revisiting ‘faster is slower’ in collective egress of human crowds," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 51-69.
    11. Guo, Ren-Yong, 2014. "Simulation of spatial and temporal separation of pedestrian counter flow through a bottleneck," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 415(C), pages 428-439.
    12. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid & Shahhoseini, Zahra, 2015. "Accommodating taste heterogeneity and desired substitution pattern in exit choices of pedestrian crowd evacuees using a mixed nested logit model," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 58-68.
    13. Liu, Qian, 2018. "The effect of dedicated exit on the evacuation of heterogeneous pedestrians," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 305-323.
    14. Johansson, Fredrik & Peterson, Anders & Tapani, Andreas, 2015. "Waiting pedestrians in the social force model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 419(C), pages 95-107.
    15. Ji, Xiangfeng & Zhang, Jian & Ran, Bin, 2013. "A study on pedestrian choice between stairway and escalator in the transfer station based on floor field cellular automata," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(20), pages 5089-5100.
    16. Zhou, Zi-Xuan & Nakanishi, Wataru & Asakura, Yasuo, 2021. "Route choice in the pedestrian evacuation: Microscopic formulation based on visual information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    17. Haghani, Milad, 2021. "The knowledge domain of crowd dynamics: Anatomy of the field, pioneering studies, temporal trends, influential entities and outside-domain impact," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 580(C).
    18. Ken Hidaka & Toshiyuki Yamamoto, 2021. "Activity Scheduling Behavior of the Visitors to an Outdoor Recreational Facility Using GPS Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    19. Ji, Xiangfeng & Zhou, Xuemei & Ran, Bin, 2013. "A cell-based study on pedestrian acceleration and overtaking in a transfer station corridor," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(8), pages 1828-1839.
    20. Cheng, Zhiyang & Yue, Hao & Zhang, Ning & Zhang, Xu, 2024. "Research on mechanism and simulation for avoiding behavior of individual pedestrian," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 634(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12540-:d:678241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.