IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12014-d668739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Insight into the Level of Information about Sustainability of Edible Insects in a Traditionally Non-Insect-Eating Country: Exploratory Study

Author

Listed:
  • Raquel P. F. Guiné

    (Agrarian School of Viseu, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3500-606 Viseu, Portugal
    CERNAS Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal)

  • Sofia G. Florença

    (Agrarian School of Viseu, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3500-606 Viseu, Portugal
    Faculty of Food and Nutrition Sciences, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Ofélia Anjos

    (School of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, 6001-909 Castelo Branco, Portugal
    Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
    Centro de Biotecnologia de Plantas da Beira Interior, 6001-909 Castelo Branco, Portugal)

  • Paula M. R. Correia

    (Agrarian School of Viseu, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3500-606 Viseu, Portugal
    CERNAS Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal)

  • Bruno M. Ferreira

    (School of Technology and Management of Viseu, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal)

  • Cristina A. Costa

    (Agrarian School of Viseu, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3500-606 Viseu, Portugal
    CERNAS Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal)

Abstract

Insects have been reported as a possible alternative solution to help feed the growing world population with less stress on the planet, thus contributing to the preservation of the environment and natural ecosystems. However, the consumption of edible insects (EIs), although culturally accepted for some communities, is not readily accepted for others. Hence this work explores the level of information that people in a traditionally non-insect-eating country have about the sustainability issues related with EIs, and also some possible reasons that could motivate their consumption. The study was based on a questionnaire survey and the results were explored by descriptive statistic tools, tree classification analysis, factor analysis and cluster analysis. The results showed that the level of information is still low in general, with most people not manifesting an opinion. However, some aspects are relatively familiar to the participants (88.9% know that the ecological footprint of insects is smaller than other meats and 86.9% know that they efficiently convert organic matter into protein). Factor and cluster analysis showed three classes: cluster 1—people not informed about the facts disclosed through the true statements and also not able to distinguish the false information; cluster 2—people not informed about the facts disclosed through the true statements but who were able to distinguish the false information; and cluster 3—people well informed about the facts disclosed through the true statements but who were marginally unable to distinguish the false information. It was also found that education, sex and professional area are the most relevant sociodemographic factors associated with the level of information, and the highest motivations to consume EIs are their contribution to preserve the environment and natural resources followed by being a more sustainable option (for 64.7% and 53.4% of participants, respectively). Hence it was concluded that, although some work still needs to be done to better inform people about EIs, there is already some conscientiousness that they constitute a good and more sustainable alternative to other types of meat.

Suggested Citation

  • Raquel P. F. Guiné & Sofia G. Florença & Ofélia Anjos & Paula M. R. Correia & Bruno M. Ferreira & Cristina A. Costa, 2021. "An Insight into the Level of Information about Sustainability of Edible Insects in a Traditionally Non-Insect-Eating Country: Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12014-:d:668739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12014/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12014/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menozzi, Davide & Mora, Cristina & Sogari, Giovanni, 2019. "Edible Insects in the Food Sector: Methods, Current Applications and Perspective," 2019 Eighth AIEAA Conference, June 13-14, Pistoia, Italy 300915, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    2. Vaclav Smil, 2002. "Eating Meat: Evolution, Patterns, and Consequences," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 28(4), pages 599-639, December.
    3. Raquel P. F. Guiné & Elena Bartkiene & Sofia G. Florença & Ilija Djekić & Maša Černelič Bizjak & Monica Tarcea & Marcela Leal & Vanessa Ferreira & Ivana Rumbak & Panagiotis Orfanos & Viktória Szűcs & , 2021. "Environmental Issues as Drivers for Food Choice: Study from a Multinational Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Brian Machovina & Kenneth J. Feeley, 2014. "Livestock: limit red meat consumption," Nature, Nature, vol. 508(7495), pages 186-186, April.
    5. Céline Gallen & Gaëlle Pantin-Sohier & Dominique Peyrat-Guillard, 2021. "Familiarisation et diffusion de l’entomophagie en France," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 153-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dimitris Skalkos, 2022. "Innovative Agrifood Supply Chain in the Post-COVID 19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-4, April.
    2. Katarzyna Mazur-Włodarczyk & Agnieszka Gruszecka-Kosowska, 2022. "Sustainable or Not? Insights on the Consumption of Animal Products in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Raquel P. F. Guiné & Sofia G. Florença & Cristina A. Costa & Paula M. R. Correia & Manuela Ferreira & Ana P. Cardoso & Sofia Campos & Ofélia Anjos & Cristina Chuck-Hernández & Marijana Matek Sarić & I, 2022. "Investigation of the Level of Knowledge in Different Countries about Edible Insects: Cluster Segmentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Bordiean & Michał Krzyżaniak & Mariusz J. Stolarski & Dumitru Peni, 2020. "Growth Potential of Yellow Mealworm Reared on Industrial Residues," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Rosalia Stella Evola & Giovanni Peira & Erica Varese & Alessandro Bonadonna & Enrica Vesce, 2022. "Short Food Supply Chains in Europe: Scientific Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Raquel P. F. Guiné & Sofia G. Florença & Ofélia Anjos & Nada M. Boustani & Cristina Chuck-Hernández & Marijana Matek Sarić & Manuela Ferreira & Cristina A. Costa & Elena Bartkiene & Ana P. Cardoso & M, 2022. "Are Consumers Aware of Sustainability Aspects Related to Edible Insects? Results from a Study Involving 14 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Morgana Weber Macena & Rita Carvalho & Luísa Paula Cruz-Lopes & Raquel P. F. Guiné, 2021. "Plastic Food Packaging: Perceptions and Attitudes of Portuguese Consumers about Environmental Impact and Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Theresa K. Meyer & Alexis Pascaris & David Denkenberger & Joshua M. Pearce, 2021. "U.S. Potential of Sustainable Backyard Distributed Animal and Plant Protein Production during and after Pandemics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Nathana L. Cristofoli & Alexandre R. Lima & Rose D. N. Tchonkouang & Andreia C. Quintino & Margarida C. Vieira, 2023. "Advances in the Food Packaging Production from Agri-Food Waste and By-Products: Market Trends for a Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-33, April.
    7. Tiziano Gomiero, 2013. "Alternative Land Management Strategies and Their Impact on Soil Conservation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Anna Kustar & Dalia Patino-Echeverri, 2021. "A Review of Environmental Life Cycle Assessments of Diets: Plant-Based Solutions Are Truly Sustainable, even in the Form of Fast Foods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Valerie Kilders & Vincenzina Caputo & Jayson L. Lusk, 2024. "Consumer preferences for food away from home: Dine in versus delivery," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(2), pages 496-525, March.
    10. Raquel P. F. Guiné & João Duarte & Cristina Chuck-Hernández & Nada M. Boustani & Ilija Djekic & Elena Bartkiene & Marijana Matec Sarić & Maria Papageorgiou & Malgorzata Korzeniowska & Patricia Combarr, 2023. "Validation of the Scale Knowledge and Perceptions about Edible Insects through Structural Equation Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Anna Bordiean & Michał Krzyżaniak & Mariusz J. Stolarski & Stanisław Czachorowski & Dumitru Peni, 2020. "Will Yellow Mealworm Become a Source of Safe Proteins for Europe?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-30, June.
    12. Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández & Mauricio Guerra-Velásquez & Manuel Escobar-Farfán & Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas, 2022. "Influence of COVID-19 on Environmental Awareness, Sustainable Consumption, and Social Responsibility in Latin American Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Chiara Lorini & Laura Ricotta & Virginia Vettori & Marco Del Riccio & Massimiliano Alberto Biamonte & Guglielmo Bonaccorsi, 2021. "Insights into the Predictors of Attitude toward Entomophagy: The Potential Role of Health Literacy: A Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in a Sample of Students of the University of Florence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    14. van der Linden, Aart & Oosting, Simon J. & van de Ven, Gerrie W.J. & de Boer, Imke J.M. & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2015. "A framework for quantitative analysis of livestock systems using theoretical concepts of production ecology," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 100-109.
    15. Miina Porkka & Matti Kummu & Stefan Siebert & Olli Varis, 2013. "From Food Insufficiency towards Trade Dependency: A Historical Analysis of Global Food Availability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12014-:d:668739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.