IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i6p233-d372777.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will Yellow Mealworm Become a Source of Safe Proteins for Europe?

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Bordiean

    (Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Production, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-724 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Michał Krzyżaniak

    (Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Production, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-724 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Mariusz J. Stolarski

    (Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Stanisław Czachorowski

    (Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Dumitru Peni

    (Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Production, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-724 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

Continued population growth could lead to protein deficiency in the human diet. To counteract this risk, attempts are being made to identify new edible sources of protein. The aim of this paper was to review the existing literature and to analyse the current state of yellow mealworm ( Tenebrio molitor ) rearing for food and feed, especially in Europe. The yellow mealworm is the most widely bred and traded insect species in Europe that has high feed conversion ratio; 3.4 to 6.1 kg of feed ingested per kg of harvested larvae. Mealworms could compete with livestock due to their high protein and fat content and low environmental impact. Mealworms have been extensively researched as a source of feed for animals, including poultry, fish, pets and birds. Its nutrient content depends on the processing method, where thermal processing is least desirable. Mealworms are characterised by a high and variable microbial load which has to be reduced before consumption. The antibiotics, pesticides and other substances should also be analysed to ensure that mealworms are a safe protein source for human consumption. The nutritional benefits of mealworms have to be communicated to European consumers who are generally averse to eating insects.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Bordiean & Michał Krzyżaniak & Mariusz J. Stolarski & Stanisław Czachorowski & Dumitru Peni, 2020. "Will Yellow Mealworm Become a Source of Safe Proteins for Europe?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:6:p:233-:d:372777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/6/233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/6/233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig A. Barnett & John Skelhorn & Melissa Bateson & Candy Rowe, 2012. "Educated predators make strategic decisions to eat defended prey according to their toxin content," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 418-424.
    2. Premalatha, M. & Abbasi, Tasneem & Abbasi, Tabassum & Abbasi, S.A., 2011. "Energy-efficient food production to reduce global warming and ecodegradation: The use of edible insects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4357-4360.
    3. Vaclav Smil, 2002. "Eating Meat: Evolution, Patterns, and Consequences," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 28(4), pages 599-639, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Odunayo A. Toviho & Péter Bársony, 2022. "Nutrient Composition and Growth of Yellow Mealworm ( Tenebrio molitor ) at Different Ages and Stages of the Life Cycle," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Anna Nogalska & Sebastian Wojciech Przemieniecki & Sławomir Józef Krzebietke & Dariusz Załuski & Agnieszka Kosewska & Małgorzata Skwierawska & Stanisław Sienkiewicz, 2022. "The Effect of Mealworm Frass on the Chemical and Microbiological Properties of Horticultural Peat in an Incubation Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Anna Bordiean & Michał Krzyżaniak & Mariusz J. Stolarski & Dumitru Peni, 2020. "Growth Potential of Yellow Mealworm Reared on Industrial Residues," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Odunayo A. Toviho & Moutia Imane & Pusztahelyi Tünde & Bársony Péter, 2023. "Effect of Duckweed ( Spirodela polyrhiza )-Supplemented Semolina on the Production Parameters and Nutrient Composition of Yellow Mealworm ( Tenebrio molitor )," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alice Exnerová & Dana Ježová & Pavel Štys & Lucia Doktorovová & Bibiana Rojas & Johanna Mappes, 2015. "Different reactions to aposematic prey in 2 geographically distant populations of great tits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1361-1370.
    2. Eili Skrivervik, 2018. "The Bioeconomy and Food Waste: Insects’ Contribution," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20181021, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    3. Lorenzo A. Cadinu & Paolo Barra & Francesco Torre & Francesco Delogu & Fabio A. Madau, 2020. "Insect Rearing: Potential, Challenges, and Circularity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Fabio A. Madau & Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Pietro Pulina, 2020. "Insect Farming for Feed and Food Production from a Circular Business Model Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Anna Bordiean & Michał Krzyżaniak & Mariusz J. Stolarski & Dumitru Peni, 2020. "Growth Potential of Yellow Mealworm Reared on Industrial Residues," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Theresa K. Meyer & Alexis Pascaris & David Denkenberger & Joshua M. Pearce, 2021. "U.S. Potential of Sustainable Backyard Distributed Animal and Plant Protein Production during and after Pandemics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Tiziano Gomiero, 2013. "Alternative Land Management Strategies and Their Impact on Soil Conservation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Anna Kustar & Dalia Patino-Echeverri, 2021. "A Review of Environmental Life Cycle Assessments of Diets: Plant-Based Solutions Are Truly Sustainable, even in the Form of Fast Foods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Marie Borkovcová & Jiří Mlček & Anna Adámková & Martin Adámek & Martina Bednářová & Zuzana Musilová & Veronika Ševčíková, 2022. "Use of Foods Based on Bee Drone Brood: Their Sensory and Microbiological Evaluation and Mineral Composition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Valerie Kilders & Vincenzina Caputo & Jayson L. Lusk, 2024. "Consumer preferences for food away from home: Dine in versus delivery," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(2), pages 496-525, March.
    11. Raquel P. F. Guiné & João Duarte & Cristina Chuck-Hernández & Nada M. Boustani & Ilija Djekic & Elena Bartkiene & Marijana Matec Sarić & Maria Papageorgiou & Malgorzata Korzeniowska & Patricia Combarr, 2023. "Validation of the Scale Knowledge and Perceptions about Edible Insects through Structural Equation Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    12. L. G. Riggi & M. Veronesi & G. Goergen & C. MacFarlane & R. L. Verspoor, 2016. "Observations of entomophagy across Benin – practices and potentials," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 139-149, February.
    13. Aikaterini Paltaki & Anastasios Michailidis & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Konstantinos Zaralis & Efstratios Loizou, 2021. "Bioeconomy and Livestock Production Nexus: A Bibliometric Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-12, November.
    14. Raquel P. F. Guiné & Sofia G. Florença & Ofélia Anjos & Paula M. R. Correia & Bruno M. Ferreira & Cristina A. Costa, 2021. "An Insight into the Level of Information about Sustainability of Edible Insects in a Traditionally Non-Insect-Eating Country: Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    15. L. Riggi & M. Veronesi & G. Goergen & C. MacFarlane & R. Verspoor, 2016. "Observations of entomophagy across Benin – practices and potentials," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 139-149, February.
    16. à Ziem, D.C. Bitang & Gninzanlong, C.L. & Tabi, C.B. & Kofané, T.C., 2021. "Dynamics and pattern formation of a diffusive predator - prey model in the subdiffusive regime in presence of toxicity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    17. Massimiliano Borrello & Francesco Caracciolo & Alessia Lombardi & Stefano Pascucci & Luigi Cembalo, 2017. "Consumers’ Perspective on Circular Economy Strategy for Reducing Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, January.
    18. van der Linden, Aart & Oosting, Simon J. & van de Ven, Gerrie W.J. & de Boer, Imke J.M. & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2015. "A framework for quantitative analysis of livestock systems using theoretical concepts of production ecology," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 100-109.
    19. Miina Porkka & Matti Kummu & Stefan Siebert & Olli Varis, 2013. "From Food Insufficiency towards Trade Dependency: A Historical Analysis of Global Food Availability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Chi-Yun Kuo & Hao-En Chin & Yu-Zhe Wu, 2023. "Intricate covariation between exploration and avoidance learning in a generalist predator," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(4), pages 708-717.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:6:p:233-:d:372777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.