IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11333-d655766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Language Relativity in Legacy Literature: A Systematic Review in Multiple Languages

Author

Listed:
  • Ji Wu

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Madeleine Orr

    (Institute for Sport Business, Loughborough University London, London E15 2GW, UK)

  • Kurumi Aizawa

    (Independent Researcher, Madison, WI 53705, USA)

  • Yuhei Inoue

    (Sport Policy Unit, Department of Economics, Policy and International Business, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK)

Abstract

Since the Olympic Agenda 2020, legacy has been widely used as a justification for hosting the Olympic Games, through which sustainable development can be achieved for both events and host cities. To date, no universal definition of legacy has been established, which presents challenges for legacy-related international knowledge transfer among host cities. To address this gap, a multilingual systematic review of the literature regarding the concept of legacy was conducted in French, Japanese, Chinese, and English. Using English literature as a baseline, points of convergence and divergence among the languages were identified. While all four languages value the concept of legacy as an important facet of mega-events, significant differences were found within each language. This finding highlights the importance of strategies that align different cultures when promoting sustainable development of some global movements such as the Olympic legacy. Sport management is replete with international topics, such as international events and sport for development, and each topic is studied simultaneously in several languages and with potentially differing frameworks and perspectives. Thus, literature reviews that examine the English literature, exclusively, are innately limited in scope. The development of partnerships and resources that facilitate cross-lingual and cross-cultural consultation and collaboration is an important research agenda. More research is needed on knowledge translation across languages.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji Wu & Madeleine Orr & Kurumi Aizawa & Yuhei Inoue, 2021. "Language Relativity in Legacy Literature: A Systematic Review in Multiple Languages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11333-:d:655766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11333/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11333/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Müller & Sven Daniel Wolfe & Christopher Gaffney & David Gogishvili & Miriam Hug & Annick Leick, 2021. "An evaluation of the sustainability of the Olympic Games," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 340-348, April.
    2. Aizawa, Kurumi & Wu, Ji & Inoue, Yuhei & Sato, Mikihiro, 2018. "Long-term impact of the Tokyo 1964 Olympic Games on sport participation: A cohort analysis," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 86-97.
    3. Martin Schnitzer & Lukas Haizinger, 2019. "Does the Olympic Agenda 2020 Have the Power to Create a New Olympic Heritage? An Analysis for the 2026 Winter Olympic Games Bid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Byers, Terri & Hayday, Emily & Pappous, Athanasios (Sakis), 2020. "A new conceptualization of mega sports event legacy delivery: Wicked problems and critical realist solution," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 171-182.
    5. Nico Schulenkorf, 2012. "Sustainable community development through sport and events: A conceptual framework for Sport-for-Development projects," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Schulenkorf, Nico, 2012. "Sustainable community development through sport and events: A conceptual framework for Sport-for-Development projects," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12.
    7. Thomson, Alana & Cuskelly, Graham & Toohey, Kristine & Kennelly, Millicent & Burton, Paul & Fredline, Liz, 2019. "Sport event legacy: A systematic quantitative review of literature," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 295-321.
    8. Nola Agha & Sheranne Fairley & Heather Gibson, 2012. "Considering legacy as a multi-dimensional construct: The legacy of the Olympic Games," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 125-139, January.
    9. Terri Byers & Emily Hayday & Athanasios (Sakis) Pappous, 2020. "A new conceptualization of mega sports event legacy delivery: Wicked problems and critical realist solution," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 171-182, April.
    10. Alana Thomson & Graham Cuskelly & Kristine Toohey & Millicent Kennelly & Paul Burton & Liz Fredline, 2019. "Sport event legacy: A systematic quantitative review of literature," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 295-321, July.
    11. Kurumi Aizawa & Ji Wu & Yuhei Inoue & Mikihiro Sato, 2018. "Long-term impact of the Tokyo 1964 Olympic Games on sport participation: A cohort analysis," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 86-97, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luke R. Potwarka & Pamela Wicker, 2020. "Conditions under Which Trickle-Down Effects Occur: A Realist Synthesis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Themistocles Kokolakakis & Fernando Lera-Lopez, 2020. "Sport Promotion through Sport Mega-Events. An Analysis for Types of Olympic Sports in London 2012," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Jeongbeom Hahm & Tae-Ahn Kang & Hirotaka Matsuoka, 2021. "Understanding the Relationship between Past Experience of a Sports Mega-Event and Current Spectatorship: The Mediating Role of Nostalgia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Abel Meza Talavera & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi & Muammer Koç, 2019. "Sustainability in Mega-Events: Beyond Qatar 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.
    5. Anna-Maria Strittmatter & Dag Vidar Hanstad & Berit Skirstad, 2021. "Facilitating Sustainable Outcomes for the Organization of Youth Sports through Youth Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Rui Augusto da Costa & Ines Moleiro & Maria Fernanda Brasete, 2022. "Sports Tourism and High-Performance Centres in the Portugal Central Region," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 15(1), pages 111-121.
    7. Harris, Kevin & Adams, Andrew, 2016. "Power and discourse in the politics of evidence in sport for development," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 97-106.
    8. Matthew Walker & Stephen Hills & Bob Heere, 2017. "Evaluating a Socially Responsible Employment Program: Beneficiary Impacts and Stakeholder Perceptions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 53-70, June.
    9. Marko Perić & Vanja Vitezić, 2019. "Socio-Economic Impacts of Event Failure: The Case of a Cancelled International Cycling Race," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Louis Moustakas & Lisa Kalina, 2022. "Learning Football for Good: The Development and Evaluation of the Football3 MOOC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Chiara D'Angelo & Chiara Corvino & Eloisa Cianci & Caterina Gozzoli, 2020. "Sport for Vulnerable Youth: The Role of Multi-Professional Groups in Sustaining Intersectoral Collaboration," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 129-138.
    12. Felipe Magno & Carla Schwengber ten Caten & Alberto Reinaldo Reppold Filho & Aline Marian Callegaro & Alan de Carvalho Dias Ferreira, 2020. "Factors Related to Sports Participation in Brazil: An Analysis Based on the 2015 National Household Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Jones, Gareth J. & Edwards, Michael B. & Bocarro, Jason N. & Bunds, Kyle S. & Smith, Jordan W., 2018. "Leveraging community sport organizations to promote community capacity: Strategic outcomes, challenges, and theoretical considerations," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 279-292.
    14. LeCrom, Carrie W. & Martin, Tiesha & Dwyer, Brendan & Greenhalgh, Greg, 2019. "The role of management in achieving health outcomes in SFD programmes: A stakeholder perspective," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 53-67.
    15. Hoekman, Michael J. & Schulenkorf, Nico & Welty Peachey, Jon, 2019. "Re-engaging local youth for sustainable sport-for-development," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 613-625.
    16. Emma Ferranti & Lauren Andres & Stuart Paul Denoon-Stevens & Lorena Melgaço & Daniel Oberling & Andrew Quinn, 2020. "Operational Challenges and Mega Sporting Events Legacy: The Case of BRT Systems in the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Shaoxiong Yang & Jinfu Xu & Ruoyu Yang, 2020. "Research on Coordination and Driving Factors of Sports Industry and Regional Sustainable Development—Empirical Research Based on Panel Data of Provinces and Cities in Eastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Seung Pil Lee, 2020. "Sustainable Reciprocity Mechanism of Social Initiatives in Sport: The Mediating Effect of Gratitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Huei-Fu Lu, 2021. "Hallmark Sporting Events as a Vehicle for Promoting the Sustainable Development of Regional Tourism: Strategic Perspectives from Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Reis, Arianne C. & Vieira, Marcelo Carvalho & Sousa-Mast, Fabiana Rodrigues de, 2016. "“Sport for Development” in developing countries: The case of the Vilas Olímpicas do Rio de Janeiro," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 107-119.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11333-:d:655766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.