IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i17p6011-d400723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Related to Sports Participation in Brazil: An Analysis Based on the 2015 National Household Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Felipe Magno

    (Graduate Program on Industrial Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90035-190, Brazil)

  • Carla Schwengber ten Caten

    (Graduate Program on Industrial Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90035-190, Brazil)

  • Alberto Reinaldo Reppold Filho

    (School of Physical Education, Physical Therapy and Dance from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul; Porto Alegre 90690-200, Brazil)

  • Aline Marian Callegaro

    (Interdisciplinary Department of Campus Litoral Norte from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul; Tramandaí 95590-000, Brazil)

  • Alan de Carvalho Dias Ferreira

    (School of Physical Education, Physical Therapy and Dance from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul; Porto Alegre 90690-200, Brazil)

Abstract

The academic interest in analyzing the correlates of sports participation in several countries has increased recently. Nevertheless, in developing countries, which do not monitor sportive data, this type of investigation is still scarce. This study aims to analyze socioeconomic, motivational, and supportive factors related to sports participation in Brazil. Data from the 2015 National Household Survey—Supplementary Questionnaire of Sports and Physical Activities are examined. In the survey, 71,142 individuals older than 15 years were interviewed (mean age 43.12 years; 53.83% women and 46.17% men). Logistic regression is used for analyzing the data. Results demonstrate a low participation in sports (23.38%). Sports participation declines with increasing age (2% less per year), increases with higher educational level (graduated 5.9 times more), and males prevail in the sporting context (2.3 times more). The main obstacle to women’s participation is the lack of sports facilities, and for men the lack of time and health problems. Men practice sports mainly due to socialization, fun, and competition, and women due to medical recommendation. Soccer was the most practiced sport (28.1%), predominating among men. Public policies on sports promotion for fun and socialization may increase male participation, and investments in sports facilities may increase female participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Felipe Magno & Carla Schwengber ten Caten & Alberto Reinaldo Reppold Filho & Aline Marian Callegaro & Alan de Carvalho Dias Ferreira, 2020. "Factors Related to Sports Participation in Brazil: An Analysis Based on the 2015 National Household Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6011-:d:400723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6011/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6011/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aizawa, Kurumi & Wu, Ji & Inoue, Yuhei & Sato, Mikihiro, 2018. "Long-term impact of the Tokyo 1964 Olympic Games on sport participation: A cohort analysis," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 86-97.
    2. Wicker, Pamela & Hallmann, Kirstin & Breuer, Christoph, 2013. "Analyzing the impact of sport infrastructure on sport participation using geo-coded data: Evidence from multi-level models," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 54-67.
    3. Lisa Farrell & Michael A. Shields, 2002. "Investigating the economic and demographic determinants of sporting participation in England," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 165(2), pages 335-348, June.
    4. Randy Bartlett, 1994. "Economics as a Science of Human Behavior: Towards a New Social Science Paradigm," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 288-291, March.
    5. Paul Downward, 2007. "Exploring the Economic Choice to Participate in Sport: Results from the 2002 General Household Survey," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 633-653.
    6. Kokolakakis, Themis & Lera-López, Fernando & Ramchandani, Girish, 2019. "Did London 2012 deliver a sports participation legacy?," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 276-287.
    7. Cerin, Ester & Leslie, Eva, 2008. "How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2596-2609, June.
    8. Eberth, Barbara & Smith, Murray D., 2010. "Modelling the participation decision and duration of sporting activity in Scotland," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 822-834, July.
    9. Downward, Paul & Lera-Lopez, Fernando & Rasciute, Simona, 2011. "The Zero-Inflated ordered probit approach to modelling sports participation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2469-2477.
    10. Themis Kokolakakis & Fernando Lera-López & Girish Ramchandani, 2019. "Did London 2012 deliver a sports participation legacy?," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 276-287, April.
    11. Kurumi Aizawa & Ji Wu & Yuhei Inoue & Mikihiro Sato, 2018. "Long-term impact of the Tokyo 1964 Olympic Games on sport participation: A cohort analysis," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 86-97, January.
    12. Humphreys Brad R & Ruseski Jane E, 2011. "An Economic Analysis of Participation and Time Spent in Physical Activity," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-38, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norwood, Patricia & Eberth, Barbara & Farrar, Shelley & Anable, Jillian & Ludbrook, Anne, 2014. "Active travel intervention and physical activity behaviour: An evaluation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 50-58.
    2. Cabane Charlotte & Lechner Michael, 2015. "Physical Activity of Adults: A Survey of Correlates, Determinants, and Effects," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 235(4-5), pages 376-402, August.
    3. Jane E. Ruseski & Katerina Maresova, 2014. "Economic Freedom, Sport Policy, And Individual Participation In Physical Activity: An International Comparison," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 32(1), pages 42-55, January.
    4. Muñiz, Cristina & Rodríguez, Plácido & Suárez, María J., 2014. "Sports and cultural habits by gender: An application using count data models," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 288-297.
    5. Luke R. Potwarka & Pamela Wicker, 2020. "Conditions under Which Trickle-Down Effects Occur: A Realist Synthesis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Jeongbeom Hahm & Tae-Ahn Kang & Hirotaka Matsuoka, 2021. "Understanding the Relationship between Past Experience of a Sports Mega-Event and Current Spectatorship: The Mediating Role of Nostalgia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Humphreys, Brad & Maresova, Katerina & Ruseski, Jane, 2012. "Institutional Factors, Sport Policy, and Individual Sport Participation: An International Comparison," Working Papers 2012-1, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
    8. Guizhen He & Gulijiazi Yeerkenbieke & Yvette Baninla, 2020. "Public Participation and Information Disclosure for Environmental Sustainability of 2022 Winter Olympics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Venn, Danielle & Strazdins, Lyndall, 2017. "Your money or your time? How both types of scarcity matter to physical activity and healthy eating," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 98-106.
    10. Humphreys, Brad & Ruseski, Jane & Zhou, Li, 2015. "Physical Activity, Present Bias, and Habit Formation: Theory and Evidence from Longitudinal Data," Working Papers 2015-6, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
    11. García, Jaume & Suárez, María José, 2023. "The relevance of specification assumptions when analyzing the drivers of physical activity practice," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    12. Jaana T Kari & Jaakko Pehkonen & Mirja Hirvensalo & Xiaolin Yang & Nina Hutri-Kähönen & Olli T Raitakari & Tuija H Tammelin, 2015. "Income and Physical Activity among Adults: Evidence from Self-Reported and Pedometer-Based Physical Activity Measurements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Charlotte Cabane & Andrew E. Clark, 2015. "Childhood Sporting Activities andAdult Labour-Market Outcome," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 119-120, pages 123-148.
    14. Yasemin Öztürk & Tekin Köse & Kayra Özcan, 2021. "Gender Differences in Sports Participation: A Multi-Level Analysis," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 151-176.
    15. Michael Lechner & Paul Downward, 2017. "Heterogeneous sports participation and labour market outcomes in England," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 335-348, January.
    16. Yong Kang Cheah & Mohd Azahadi & Siew Nooi Phang & Noor Hazilah, 2017. "The Income and Demographic Determinants of Physical Activity Intensity: Evidence from a Developing Country," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 11(3), pages 348-364, August.
    17. Sari, Nazmi & Lechner, Michael, 2015. "Long-run health effects of sports and exercise in Canada," Economics Working Paper Series 1520, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    18. Brown, Heather & Roberts, Jennifer, 2011. "Exercising choice: The economic determinants of physical activity behaviour of an employed population," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 383-390, August.
    19. Kirstin Hallmann & Cristina Muñiz Artime & Christoph Breuer & Sören Dallmeyer & Magnus Metz, 2017. "Leisure participation: modelling the decision to engage in sports and culture," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(4), pages 467-487, November.
    20. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-00875305 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Joshua C. Hall & Brad R. Humphreys & Jane E. Ruseski, 2018. "Economic Freedom and Exercise: Evidence from State Outcomes," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(4), pages 1050-1066, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6011-:d:400723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.