IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10603-d642276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Safety Climate in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Bumjin Han

    (Department of Research and Development, Korea Construction and Transport Engineering Development Collaboratory Management Institute, Yongin-si 17058, Korea)

  • Seunghyun Son

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Korea)

  • Sunkuk Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Korea)

Abstract

Recent studies on safety in various fields use the concept of safety climate to explain the causes of safety accidents. Many studies attempt to measure the safety climates and identify the causes for accidents in the high-risk construction industry. Studies have shown that the higher the level of the safety climate, the lower the accident rate at construction sites. Methods of measuring safety climate, including the NOSACQ-50 survey, have been presented. Studies on the methodology of measuring safety climate should be continued to improve reliability and precision. Although many studies have been conducted to measure safety climate, such as questionnaires, regression analysis, and suggestions for safety climate measurement methods, there are few studies on a systematic literature review of them. This requires a systematic literature review (SLR) of the studies conducted so far. This study conducted an SLR on the definition and measurement methods of safety climate in the construction industry published since 2000, when safety climate’s impact on accidents began to be established. This review study utilized the PRISMA method, analyzed 735 studies, and selected 57 papers finally. SLR was carried out for selected research works, and the results were summarized. There are three methods to measure safety climate: literature survey, questionnaire, and data analysis. Factor analysis, development of measuring model, development of questionnaire, statistical analysis, and machine learning were investigated as their sub-methods. This study’s results can be used as fundamental sources for improving existing methods and developing new methods of measuring safety climate in the construction industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Bumjin Han & Seunghyun Son & Sunkuk Kim, 2021. "Measuring Safety Climate in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10603-:d:642276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10603/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10603/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharon Clarke & Katie Ward, 2006. "The Role of Leader Influence Tactics and Safety Climate in Engaging Employees' Safety Participation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1175-1185, October.
    2. Helen Clare Lingard & Tracy Cooke & Nick Blismas, 2009. "Group-level safety climate in the Australian construction industry: within-group homogeneity and between-group differences in road construction and maintenance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 419-432.
    3. Wei Tong Chen & Hew Cameron Merrett & Ying-Hua Huang & Shih Tong Lu & Wen Chun Sun & Yadi Li, 2019. "Exploring the Multilevel Perception of Safety Climate on Taiwanese Construction Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Rita Peihua Zhang & Helen Lingard & Steve Nevin, 2015. "Development and validation of a multilevel safety climate measurement tool in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(10), pages 818-839, October.
    5. Helen Lingard, 2013. "Occupational health and safety in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 505-514, June.
    6. Sławomir Wawak & Žanesa Ljevo & Mladen Vukomanović, 2020. "Understanding the Key Quality Factors in Construction Projects—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Helen Clare Lingard & Tracy Cooke & Nick Blismas, 2010. "Safety climate in conditions of construction subcontracting: a multi-level analysis," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(8), pages 813-825.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xun Liu & Zhiyuan Xue & Zhenhan Ding & Siyu Chen, 2023. "Current Status and Future Directions of Construction Safety Climate: Visual Analysis Based on WOS Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ibrahim Mosly & Anas A. Makki, 2020. "Safety Climate Perceptions in the Construction Industry of Saudi Arabia: The Current Situation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Ibrahim Mosly & Anas A. Makki, 2021. "The Effects of Multi-Sociodemographic Characteristics of Construction Sites Personnel on Perceptions of Safety Climate-Influencing Factors: The Construction Industry in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Lars Peter Andersen & Line Nørdam & Thomas Joensson & Pete Kines & Kent J. Nielsen, 2018. "Social identity, safety climate and self-reported accidents among construction workers," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 22-31, January.
    4. Anas A. Makki & Ibrahim Mosly, 2020. "Determinants for Safety Climate Evaluation of Construction Industry Sites in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-10, November.
    5. Carol K.H. Hon & Yulin Liu, 2016. "Exploring Typical and Atypical Safety Climate Perceptions of Practitioners in the Repair, Maintenance, Minor Alteration and Addition (RMAA) Sector in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Wei Tong Chen & Hew Cameron Merrett & Ying-Hua Huang & Shih Tong Lu & Wen Chun Sun & Yadi Li, 2019. "Exploring the Multilevel Perception of Safety Climate on Taiwanese Construction Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Valerie Caven, 2012. "Organization Management in Construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 494-496, February.
    8. Zongjie Pi & Xin Gao & Linyan Chen & Jinghua Liu, 2019. "The New Path to Improve Construction Safety Performance in China: An Evolutionary Game Theoretic Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Rita Peihua Zhang & Helen Lingard & Steve Nevin, 2015. "Development and validation of a multilevel safety climate measurement tool in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(10), pages 818-839, October.
    10. Graeme D. Larsen & Jennifer Whyte, 2013. "Safe construction through design: perspectives from the site team," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 675-690, June.
    11. Ryan Mullins & Raj Agnihotri, 2022. "Digital selling: organizational and managerial influences for frontline readiness and effectiveness," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 800-821, July.
    12. Wei Tong Chen & Hew Cameron Merrett & Ying-Hua Huang & Theresia Avila Bria & Ying-Hsiu Lin, 2021. "Exploring the Relationship between Safety Climate and Worker Safety Behavior on Building Construction Sites in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Huakang Liang & Ken-Yu Lin & Shoujian Zhang & Yikun Su, 2018. "The Impact of Coworkers’ Safety Violations on an Individual Worker: A Social Contagion Effect within the Construction Crew," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Andrea Bazzoli & Matteo Curcuruto & James I. Morgan & Margherita Brondino & Margherita Pasini, 2020. "Speaking Up about Workplace Safety: An Experimental Study on Safety Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Wen Yi & Albert Chan, 2016. "Health Profile of Construction Workers in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Carla S Fugas & Sílvia A Silva & José L Meliá, 2013. "Profiling Safety Behaviors: Exploration of the Sociocognitive Variables that Best Discriminate Between Different Behavioral Patterns," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(5), pages 838-850, May.
    17. Huakang Liang & Ken-Yu Lin & Shoujian Zhang, 2018. "Understanding the Social Contagion Effect of Safety Violations within a Construction Crew: A Hybrid Approach Using System Dynamics and Agent-Based Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, November.
    18. Nihan Yıldırım & Derya Gultekin & Doğan Tilkici & Dilek Ay, 2022. "An Institutional System Proposal for Advanced Occupational Safety and Labor Standards in the Turkish Construction Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-31, November.
    19. Mohamad Azrin Ahamad & Kadir Arifin & Azlan Abas & Mahfudz Mahfudz & Muhammad Basir Cyio & Muhammad Khairil & Muhammad Nur Ali & Ilyas Lampe & Muhammad Ahsan Samad, 2022. "Systematic Literature Review on Variables Impacting Organization’s Zero Accident Vision in Occupational Safety and Health Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-28, June.
    20. Matthew R. Hallowell & Dillon Alexander & John A. Gambatese, 2017. "Energy-based safety risk assessment: does magnitude and intensity of energy predict injury severity?," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1-2), pages 64-77, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10603-:d:642276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.