IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6165-d565639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Customer Satisfaction of Recommender System: Examining Accuracy and Diversity in Several Types of Recommendation Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Jaekyeong Kim

    (School of Management, KyungHee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea
    Department of Big Data Analytics, KyungHee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea)

  • Ilyoung Choi

    (Graduate School of Business Administration, KyungHee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea)

  • Qinglong Li

    (Department of Big Data Analytics, KyungHee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea)

Abstract

Information technology and the popularity of mobile devices allow for various types of customer data, such as purchase history and behavior patterns, to be collected. As customer data accumulate, the demand for recommender systems that provide customized services to customers is growing. Global e-commerce companies offer recommender systems to gain a sustainable competitive advantage. Research on recommender systems has consistently suggested that customer satisfaction will be highest when the recommendation algorithm is accurate and recommends a diversity of items. However, few studies have investigated the impact of accuracy and diversity on customer satisfaction. In this research, we seek to identify the factors determining customer satisfaction when using the recommender system. To this end, we develop several recommender systems and measure their ability to deliver accurate and diverse recommendations and their ability to generate customer satisfaction with diverse data sets. The results show that accuracy and diversity positively affect customer satisfaction when applying a deep learning-based recommender system. By contrast, only accuracy positively affects customer satisfaction when applying traditional recommender systems. These results imply that developers or managers of recommender systems need to identify factors that further improve customer satisfaction with the recommender system and promote the sustainable development of e-commerce.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaekyeong Kim & Ilyoung Choi & Qinglong Li, 2021. "Customer Satisfaction of Recommender System: Examining Accuracy and Diversity in Several Types of Recommendation Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6165-:d:565639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6165/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6165/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vicki McKinney & Kanghyun Yoon & Fatemeh “Mariam” Zahedi, 2002. "The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 296-315, September.
    2. Her-Sen Doong & Hsiangchu Lai, 2008. "Exploring usage continuance of e-negotiation systems: expectation and disconfirmation approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 111-126, March.
    3. Yan Guo & Chengxin Yin & Mingfu Li & Xiaoting Ren & Ping Liu, 2018. "Mobile e-Commerce Recommendation System Based on Multi-Source Information Fusion for Sustainable e-Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Hea In Lee & Il Young Choi & Hyun Sil Moon & Jae Kyeong Kim, 2020. "A Multi-Period Product Recommender System in Online Food Market based on Recurrent Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shili Mohamed & Kaouthar Sethom & Abdallah Namoun & Ali Tufail & Ki-Hyung Kim & Hani Almoamari, 2022. "Customer Profiling Using Internet of Things Based Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Mohan Khanal & Sudip Raj Khadka & Harendra Subedi & Indra Prasad Chaulagain & Lok Nath Regmi & Mohan Bhandari, 2023. "Explaining the Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction at the Fintech Firm F1 Soft by Using PCA and XAI," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Jaeho Jeong & Dongeon Kim & Xinzhe Li & Qinglong Li & Ilyoung Choi & Jaekyeong Kim, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of Personalized Recommendation and Reward Effect on Customer Behavior: A Stimulus–Organism–Response (SOR) Model Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Yuanyuan Zhuang & Jaekyeong Kim, 2021. "A BERT-Based Multi-Criteria Recommender System for Hotel Promotion Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Marek Gaworski & Piotr F. Borowski & Łukasz Kozioł, 2022. "Supporting Decision-Making in the Technical Equipment Selection Process by the Method of Contradictory Evaluations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farah Tawfiq Abdul Hussien & Abdul Monem S. Rahma & Hala B. Abdulwahab, 2021. "An E-Commerce Recommendation System Based on Dynamic Analysis of Customer Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Ding, David Xin & Hu, Paul Jen-Hwa & Sheng, Olivia R. Liu, 2011. "e-SELFQUAL: A scale for measuring online self-service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 508-515, May.
    3. Sharma, Mahak & Antony, Rose & Sehrawat, Rajat & Cruz, Angel Contreras & Daim, Tugrul U., 2022. "Exploring post-adoption behaviors of e-service users: Evidence from the hospitality sector /online travel services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Neus Vila-Brunet & Josep Llach, 2020. "OSS-Qual: Holistic Scale to Assess Customer Quality Perception When Buying Secondhand Products in Online Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Luo, Xi & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Hollebeek, Linda D. & Lim, Xin-Jean, 2024. "Boosting customers’ impulsive buying tendency in live-streaming commerce: The role of customer engagement and deal proneness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Siti Hasma Hajar Mat Zin & Siti Haslini Zakaria & Rumaizah Che Md Nor & Nor Hidayah Hassim & CT Munirah Niesha Mohd Shafee & Suhanah Rosnan & Nur Syafizan Mohd Sufter, 2024. "Analyzing Consumers Online Shopping Behavior Using Different Online Shopping Platforms: A Case Study in Malaysia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(2), pages 99-110.
    7. Zhiyi Zhuo, 2019. "Research on using Six Sigma management to improve bank customer satisfaction," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Umbas KRISNANTO, 2017. "Empirical Study on the Relationships of Internet Banking Quality, Customer Value, and Customer Satisfaction," Expert Journal of Marketing, Sprint Investify, vol. 5(1), pages 17-27.
    9. Paulo Rita & Ricardo F. Ramos, 2022. "Global Research Trends in Consumer Behavior and Sustainability in E-Commerce: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Knowledge Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Pradeep Kumar Ponnamma Divakaran & Jie Xiong, 2022. "Eliciting brand association networks: A new method using online community data," Post-Print hal-03700393, HAL.
    11. Zhang, Yufei & Voorhees, Clay M. & Lin, Chen & Chiang, Jeongwen & Hult, G.Tomas M. & Calantone, Roger J., 2022. "Information Search and Product Returns Across Mobile and Traditional Online Channels," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 260-276.
    12. Li, Han & Gupta, Ashish & Zhang, Jie & Flor, Nick, 2020. "Who will use augmented reality? An integrated approach based on text analytics and field survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(3), pages 502-516.
    13. Verhagen, Tibert & Meents, Selmar, 2007. "A Framework for Developing Semantic Differentials in IS research: Assessing the Meaning of Electronic Marketplace Quality (EMQ)," Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    14. Chiyao Sun & Ji’an Liu & Liana Razmerita & Yanru Xu & Jia Qi, 2022. "Higher Education to Support Sustainable Development: The Influence of Information Literacy and Online Learning Process on Chinese Postgraduates’ Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Divakaran, Pradeep Kumar Ponnamma & Xiong, Jie, 2022. "Eliciting brand association networks: A new method using online community data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    16. S, Suresh Kumar & S R, Shehnaz & Salam, Shiny, 2020. "Resurgence of small eateries– The successful business model of online Food Apps in major cities of Kerala," MPRA Paper 109185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Dr. Neelotpaul Banerjee & Santosh Sah, 2012. "A Comparative Study of Customers¡¯ Perceptions of Service Quality Dimensions between Public and Private Banks in India," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(5), pages 33-44, September.
    18. Ali Dehghan & Theodore Trafalis, 2012. "Examining Churn and Loyalty Using Support Vector Machine," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(4), pages 153-161, December.
    19. Lin Li & Kyung Young Lee & Emmanuel Emokpae & Sung-Byung Yang, 2021. "What makes you continuously use chatbot services? Evidence from chinese online travel agencies," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 575-599, September.
    20. Akaret Tangsuwan & Paul Mason, 2019. "Towards improved understanding of success criteria for telecoms billing & revenue management systems: from implementation to practical value," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 256-265, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6165-:d:565639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.