IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15369-d977208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Investigation of Personalized Recommendation and Reward Effect on Customer Behavior: A Stimulus–Organism–Response (SOR) Model Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jaeho Jeong

    (Department of Business Administration, Kyung Hee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea)

  • Dongeon Kim

    (Department of Big Data Analytics, Kyung Hee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea)

  • Xinzhe Li

    (Department of Big Data Analytics, Kyung Hee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea)

  • Qinglong Li

    (Department of Big Data Analytics, Kyung Hee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea)

  • Ilyoung Choi

    (Department of Big Data Analytics, Kyung Hee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea)

  • Jaekyeong Kim

    (Department of Big Data Analytics, Kyung Hee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
    School of Management, Kyung Hee University, 26, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

With the continuous growth in the Home Meal Replacement (HMR) market, the significance of recommender systems has been raised for effectively recommending customized HMR products to each customer. The extant literature has mainly focused on enhancing the performance of recommender systems based on offline evaluations of customers’ past purchase records. However, since the existing offline evaluation methods evaluate the consistency of products on the recommendation list with ones purchased by customers from the test dataset, they are incapable of encompassing components such as serendipity and novelty that are also crucial in recommendation. Moreover, the existing offline evaluation methods cannot measure rewards such as discount coupons that may play a vital role in strengthening customers’ desire for purchase and thereby stimulating their purchase with a provision of a recommendation list. In this study, we used an SOR model to verify the effect of personalized recommendation stimulus on a customer’s response in an actual online environment. The results indicate that the customers’ response rate was higher with a provision of personalized recommendations than that of bestseller recommendations, and higher when being offered with cash discounts than earning redeemable points. Meanwhile, the response rate to the recommendation with higher volumes of rewards was not as high as expected, while the point pressure mechanism did not work either.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaeho Jeong & Dongeon Kim & Xinzhe Li & Qinglong Li & Ilyoung Choi & Jaekyeong Kim, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of Personalized Recommendation and Reward Effect on Customer Behavior: A Stimulus–Organism–Response (SOR) Model Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15369-:d:977208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15369/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15369/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Sushant & Murphy, Mikko & Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "What drives brand love and purchase intentions toward the local food distribution system? A study of social media-based REKO (fair consumption) groups," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    2. Jaekyeong Kim & Ilyoung Choi & Qinglong Li, 2021. "Customer Satisfaction of Recommender System: Examining Accuracy and Diversity in Several Types of Recommendation Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Leenheer, Jorna & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., 2008. "Which retailers adopt a loyalty program? An empirical study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 429-442.
    4. Dorotic, Matilda & Verhoef, Peter C. & Fok, Dennis & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., 2014. "Reward redemption effects in a loyalty program when customers choose how much and when to redeem," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 339-355.
    5. Laura J. Kornish & Qiuping Li, 2010. "Optimal Referral Bonuses with Asymmetric Information: Firm-Offered and Interpersonal Incentives," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 108-121, 01-02.
    6. Yan Guo & Chengxin Yin & Mingfu Li & Xiaoting Ren & Ping Liu, 2018. "Mobile e-Commerce Recommendation System Based on Multi-Source Information Fusion for Sustainable e-Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Gilles Laurent & Pierre Chandon & Brian Wansink, 2000. "A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness," Post-Print hal-00458440, HAL.
    8. Zhengyan Guo & Yao Yao & Yuan-Cheng Chang, 2022. "Research on Customer Behavioral Intention of Hot Spring Resorts Based on SOR Model: The Multiple Mediation Effects of Service Climate and Employee Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    9. LAURENT, Gilles & CHANDON, Pierre & WANSINK, Brian, 2000. "A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness," HEC Research Papers Series 698, HEC Paris.
    10. Malika Chaudhuri & Clay M. Voorhees & Jonathan M. Beck, 2019. "The effects of loyalty program introduction and design on short- and long-term sales and gross profits," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 640-658, July.
    11. Jin, Liyin & Huang, Yunhui, 2014. "When giving money does not work: The differential effects of monetary versus in-kind rewards in referral reward programs," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 107-116.
    12. Ran Kivetz & Oleg Urminsky & Yuhuang Zheng, 2006. "The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis Resurrected: Purchase Acceleration, Illusionary Goal Progress, and Customer Retention," Natural Field Experiments 00658, The Field Experiments Website.
    13. Praveen K. Kopalle & Yacheng Sun & Scott A. Neslin & Baohong Sun & Vanitha Swaminathan, 2012. "The Joint Sales Impact of Frequency Reward and Customer Tier Components of Loyalty Programs," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 216-235, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bombaij, Nick, 2021. "Effectiveness of loyalty programs," Other publications TiSEM 095c506d-5b5c-4ea3-9b41-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Alex Belli & Anne-Maree O’Rourke & François A. Carrillat & Ljubomir Pupovac & Valentyna Melnyk & Ekaterina Napolova, 2022. "40 years of loyalty programs: how effective are they? Generalizations from a meta-analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 147-173, January.
    3. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    4. Panzone, Luca A., 2022. "Conditional Promotion With A Costly Reward: An Evaluation Of A Campaign To Motivate Consumption Of Fruit And Vegetables," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322058, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Bies, Suzanne M.T.A. & Bronnenberg, Bart J. & Gijsbrechts, Els, 2021. "How push messaging impacts consumer spending and reward redemption in store-loyalty programs," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 877-899.
    6. Bies, Suzanne, 2022. "Examining the effectiveness of activation techniques on consumer behavior in temporary loyalty programs," Other publications TiSEM ade86df3-4846-4318-938f-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Minnema, Alec & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & Non, Mariёlle C., 2017. "The impact of instant reward programs and bonus premiums on consumer purchase behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 194-211.
    8. Bombaij, Nick J.F. & Dekimpe, Marnik G., 2020. "When do loyalty programs work? The moderating role of design, retailer-strategy, and country characteristics," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 175-195.
    9. Matilda Dorotic & Dennis Fok & Peter C. Verhoef & Tammo H. A. Bijmolt, 2021. "Synergistic and cannibalization effects in a partnership loyalty program," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1021-1042, September.
    10. Faramarzi, Ashkan & Bhattacharya, Abhi, 2021. "The economic worth of loyalty programs: An event study analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 313-323.
    11. Vijay Viswanathan & Sebastian Tillmanns & Manfred Krafft & Daniel Asselmann, 2018. "Understanding the quality–quantity conundrum of customer referral programs: effects of contribution margin, extraversion, and opinion leadership," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1108-1132, November.
    12. Bazargan, Amirhossein & Karray, Salma & Zolfaghari, Saeed, 2017. "Modeling reward expiry for loyalty programs in a competitive market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 352-364.
    13. Panzone, Luca A. & Tocco, Barbara & Brečić, Ružica & Gorton, Matthew, 2024. "Healthy foods, healthy sales? Cross-category effects of a loyalty program promoting sales of fruit and vegetables," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 85-103.
    14. Bombaij, Nick J.F. & Gelper, Sarah & Dekimpe, Marnik G., 2022. "Designing successful temporary loyalty programs: An exploratory study on retailer and country differences," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1275-1295.
    15. Alina Nastasoiu & Neil T. Bendle & Charan K. Bagga & Mark Vandenbosch & Salvador Navarro, 2021. "Separating customer heterogeneity, points pressure and rewarded behavior to assess a retail loyalty program," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1132-1150, November.
    16. Yao Zhang & Eric T. Bradlow & Dylan S. Small, 2015. "Predicting Customer Value Using Clumpiness: From RFM to RFMC," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 195-208, March.
    17. Gabel, Sebastian & Guhl, Daniel, 2022. "Comparing the effectiveness of rewards and individually targeted coupons in loyalty programs," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 395-411.
    18. Mimouni Chaabane, Aida & Pez, Virginie, 2017. "“Make me feel special†: Are hierarchical loyalty programs a panacea for all brands? The role of brand concept," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 108-117.
    19. Nishio, Kazuki & Hoshino, Takahiro, 2022. "Joint modeling of effects of customer tier program on customer purchase duration and purchase amount," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Afonso Vieira, Valter & Agnihotri, Raj & de Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo & Lopes, Evandro Luiz, 2022. "How cashback strategies yield financial benefits for retailers: The mediating role of consumers’ program loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 200-212.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15369-:d:977208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.