IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5864-d560584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Recent Research on the Use of R1234yf as an Environmentally Friendly Fluid in the Organic Rankine Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Juan J. García-Pabón

    (Institute in Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Itajubá (UNIFEI), Av. BPS, 1303, Itajubá, CEP: 37500903, Brazil)

  • Dario Méndez-Méndez

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Division, Campus Irapuato-Salamanca, University of Guanajuato, Salamanca-Valle de Santiago, CP. 36885, Mexico)

  • Juan M. Belman-Flores

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Division, Campus Irapuato-Salamanca, University of Guanajuato, Salamanca-Valle de Santiago, CP. 36885, Mexico)

  • Juan M. Barroso-Maldonado

    (Engineering College, CETYS University, Mexicali, BC CP. 21259, Mexico)

  • Ali Khosravi

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland)

Abstract

ORC technology is one of the most promising technologies for the use of residual energy in the generation of electrical energy, offering simple and environmentally friendly alternatives. In this field, the selection of working fluids plays an important role in the operation of the cycle, whether in terms of the energy efficiency or the minimization of environmental impacts. Therefore, in this paper, a comprehensive review is presented on the use of R1234yf refrigerant and its mixtures as working fluids in ORC systems. These fluids are used in low- and medium-temperature applications for the use of residual energy generated from solar energy, geothermal energy, and internal combustion engines. It was concluded that R1234yf and its mixtures are competitive as compared with conventional refrigerants used in ORC.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan J. García-Pabón & Dario Méndez-Méndez & Juan M. Belman-Flores & Juan M. Barroso-Maldonado & Ali Khosravi, 2021. "A Review of Recent Research on the Use of R1234yf as an Environmentally Friendly Fluid in the Organic Rankine Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5864-:d:560584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5864/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5864/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin & Zhang, Hongguang & Yang, Fubin, 2017. "A regenerative supercritical-subcritical dual-loop organic Rankine cycle system for energy recovery from the waste heat of internal combustion engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 574-590.
    2. Liu, Wei & Meinel, Dominik & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2014. "Investigation of hydrofluoroolefins as potential working fluids in organic Rankine cycle for geothermal power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 106-116.
    3. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    4. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 435-446.
    5. Saleh, Bahaa & Koglbauer, Gerald & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2007. "Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1210-1221.
    6. Dai, Baomin & Li, Minxia & Ma, Yitai, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide blends with low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 942-952.
    7. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Nemati, Arash & ghavimi, Alireza & Yari, Mortaza, 2016. "Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of various ORC (organic Rankine cycle) configurations using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 791-802.
    8. Lion, Simone & Michos, Constantine N. & Vlaskos, Ioannis & Rouaud, Cedric & Taccani, Rodolfo, 2017. "A review of waste heat recovery and Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC) in on-off highway vehicle Heavy Duty Diesel Engine applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 691-708.
    9. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2016. "Economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system with lower global warming potential working fluids in geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1201-1213.
    10. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2020. "Advanced ORC architecture for geothermal combined heat and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    11. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    12. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    13. Wang, Dongxiang & Ling, Xiang & Peng, Hao & Liu, Lin & Tao, LanLan, 2013. "Efficiency and optimal performance evaluation of organic Rankine cycle for low grade waste heat power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 343-352.
    14. Luo, Dong & Mahmoud, Ahmad & Cogswell, Frederick, 2015. "Evaluation of Low-GWP fluids for power generation with Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 481-488.
    15. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (organic Rankine cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part A: Thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 423-434.
    16. Yamada, Noboru & Mohamad, Md Nor Anuar & Kien, Trinh Trung, 2012. "Study on thermal efficiency of low- to medium-temperature organic Rankine cycles using HFO−1234yf," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 368-375.
    17. Shu, Gequn & Liu, Lina & Tian, Hua & Wei, Haiqiao & Yu, Guopeng, 2014. "Parametric and working fluid analysis of a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC) used in engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1188-1198.
    18. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua & Hung, Tzu-Chen, 2017. "Thermo-economic analysis of the transcritical organic Rankine cycle using R1234yf/R32 mixtures as the working fluids for lower-grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 818-836.
    19. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    20. Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn & Wei, Haiqiao & Liang, Xingyu & Liu, Lina, 2012. "Fluids and parameters optimization for the organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) used in exhaust heat recovery of Internal Combustion Engine (ICE)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 125-136.
    21. Yang, Min-Hsiung, 2016. "Optimizations of the waste heat recovery system for a large marine diesel engine based on transcritical Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1109-1124.
    22. Zhang, H.G. & Wang, E.H. & Fan, B.Y., 2013. "A performance analysis of a novel system of a dual loop bottoming organic Rankine cycle (ORC) with a light-duty diesel engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1504-1513.
    23. Yang, Fubin & Cho, Heejin & Zhang, Hongguang & Zhang, Jian, 2017. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for CNG engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1100-1118.
    24. Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Song, Songsong & Bei, Chen & Wang, Hongjin & Wang, Enhua, 2015. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of an organic Rankine cycle for exhaust waste heat recovery of a diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2208-2228.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zakariya Kaneesamkandi & Abdulaziz Almujahid & Basharat Salim, 2022. "Selection of an Appropriate Solar Thermal Technology for Solar Vapor Absorption Cooling—An MADM Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Zakariya Kaneesamkandi & Ateekh Ur Rehman, 2021. "Optimum and Sustainable Cooling Technology Selection for Different Climatic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    3. Josefine Koksharov & Lauritz Zendel & Frank Dammel & Peter Stephan, 2024. "Thermodynamic, Economic and Maturity Analysis of a Carnot Battery with a Two-Zone Water Thermal Energy Storage for Different Working Fluids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoang, Anh Tuan, 2018. "Waste heat recovery from diesel engines based on Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 138-166.
    2. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Zhang, Cheng & Liu, Chao & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Li, Qibin & Wang, Shukun, 2019. "Energetic, exergetic, economic and environmental (4E) analysis and multi-factor evaluation method of low GWP fluids in trans-critical organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 332-345.
    4. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    5. Karimi, Shahram & Mansouri, Sima, 2018. "A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 600-619.
    6. Zhu, Sipeng & Zhang, Kun & Deng, Kangyao, 2020. "A review of waste heat recovery from the marine engine with highly efficient bottoming power cycles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    8. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    9. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    10. Sanne Lemmens, 2016. "Cost Engineering Techniques and Their Applicability for Cost Estimation of Organic Rankine Cycle Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    12. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    13. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    14. Yang, Min-Hsiung, 2016. "Optimizations of the waste heat recovery system for a large marine diesel engine based on transcritical Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1109-1124.
    15. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    17. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    18. Sánchez, Carlos J.N. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2018. "Technical and environmental analysis of transcritical Rankine cycles operating with numerous CO2 mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 180-190.
    19. Varma, G.V. Pradeep & Srinivas, T., 2017. "Power generation from low temperature heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 402-414.
    20. Li, Min & Zhao, Bingxiong, 2016. "Analytical thermal efficiency of medium-low temperature organic Rankine cycles derived from entropy-generation analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 121-130.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5864-:d:560584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.