IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p1189-d317515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Image, Legitimacy, and Reputation as a Sustainable Strategy: Students’ Versus Professors’ Perceptions in the Higher Education Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Del-Castillo-Feito

    (Business Economics Department, Social Science Faculty, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid 28032, Spain)

  • Alicia Blanco-González

    (Business Economics Department, Social Science Faculty, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid 28032, Spain)

  • Rafael Delgado-Alemany

    (Business Economics Department, Social Science Faculty, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid 28032, Spain)

Abstract

Higher education institutions operate in a highly competitive sector where attracting resources has become a complicated task. Intangible assets such as image, legitimacy, and reputation have been considered as crucial elements for the survival and success of organizations. Within the literature, authors have highlighted their relevance; however, the differences and relationships between these variables remains unclear. Under these circumstances, the aim of this paper is to measure the relationship between image, legitimacy, and reputation in the Public University as part of a sustainable strategy. This evaluation will be made considering students’ and professors’ perceptions to compare the results because many authors have highlighted the complexity of managing the relationship with these groups and obtaining positive assessments due to their diverse characteristics. To meet this objective, a review on the literature will be carried out, followed by analysis of the results obtained through a survey distribution. To treat the data, PLS-SEM (Partial Least Square) was used, and the corresponding measurement invariance of composite method (MICOM) and multigroup analysis (MGA) was carried out. The results confirm the proposed hypotheses on the relationship between the three variables; however, the moderating effect of the stakeholder group was not confirmed. The findings provide additional empirical evidence on the relationship between the considered variables as well as on considering more than one stakeholder group for the analysis. Managers could apply this information to improve their university´s image, reputation, and legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Del-Castillo-Feito & Alicia Blanco-González & Rafael Delgado-Alemany, 2020. "The Relationship between Image, Legitimacy, and Reputation as a Sustainable Strategy: Students’ Versus Professors’ Perceptions in the Higher Education Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1189-:d:317515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1189/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1189/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hayagreeva Rao, 1994. "The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry: 1895–1912," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S1), pages 29-44, December.
    2. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    3. Plewa, Carolin & Ho, Joanne & Conduit, Jodie & Karpen, Ingo O., 2016. "Reputation in higher education: A fuzzy set analysis of resource configurations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3087-3095.
    4. Klement Podnar & Urša Golob, 2017. "The Quest for the Corporate Reputation Definition: Lessons from the Interconnection Model of Identity, Image, and Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 186-192, November.
    5. David L. Deephouse & Suzanne M. Carter, 2005. "An Examination of Differences Between Organizational Legitimacy and Organizational Reputation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 329-360, March.
    6. Damien Chaney & Renaud Lunardo & Grégory Bressolles, 2016. "Making the store a place of learning: The effects of in-store educational activities on retailer legitimacy and shopping intentions," Post-Print hal-02047954, HAL.
    7. Brandi A. Watkins & William J. Gonzenbach, 2013. "Assessing university brand personality through logos: an analysis of the use of academics and athletics in university branding," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 15-33, June.
    8. Jee Young Chung & Bruce K. Berger & Jamie DeCoster, 2016. "Developing Measurement Scales of Organizational and Issue Legitimacy: A Case of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 405-413, August.
    9. Suomi, Kati & Järvinen, Raija, 2013. "Tracing reputation risks in retailing and higher-education services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 207-217.
    10. Tom E. Thomas, 2005. "Are business students buying it? A theoretical framework for measuring attitudes toward the legitimacy of environmental sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 186-197, May.
    11. Lev, B & Zarowin, P, 1999. "The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 353-385.
    12. Chaney, Damien & Lunardo, Renaud & Bressolles, Grégory, 2016. "Making the store a place of learning: The effects of in-store educational activities on retailer legitimacy and shopping intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5886-5893.
    13. Ali, Raza & Lynch, Richard & Melewar, T.C. & Jin, Zhongqi, 2015. "The moderating influences on the relationship of corporate reputation with its antecedents and consequences: A meta-analytic review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1105-1117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Díez-Martín, Francisco & Miotto, Giorgia & Cachón-Rodríguez, Gabriel, 2022. "Organizational legitimacy perception: Gender and uncertainty as bias for evaluation criteria," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 426-436.
    2. Juan Martín-Miguel & Camio Prado-Román & Gabriel Cachón-Rodríguez & Lilliana L. Avendaño-Miranda, 2020. "Determinants of Reputation at Private Graduate Online Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miotto, Giorgia & Del-Castillo-Feito, Cristina & Blanco-González, Alicia, 2020. "Reputation and legitimacy: Key factors for Higher Education Institutions’ sustained competitive advantage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 342-353.
    2. Annika Veh & Markus Göbel & Rick Vogel, 2019. "Corporate reputation in management research: a review of the literature and assessment of the concept," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 315-353, December.
    3. Déborah Philippe & Alain Debenedetti & Damien Chaney, 2022. "How brands mobilize status, reputation, and legitimacy cues to signal their social standing: The case of luxury watchmaking," Post-Print hal-03657352, HAL.
    4. Francisco Díez-Martín & Alicia Blanco-González & Camilo Prado-Román, 2021. "The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1007-1043, May.
    5. del-Castillo-Feito, Cristina & Blanco-González, Alicia & Hernández-Perlines, Felipe, 2022. "The impacts of socially responsible human resources management on organizational legitimacy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Ben Slimane, Karim & Chaney, Damien & Humphreys, Ashlee & Leca, Bernard, 2019. "Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 389-394.
    7. Francisco Díez-Martín & Alicia Blanco-González & Giorgia Miotto, 2022. "The impact of state legitimacy on entrepreneurial activity," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 935-955, June.
    8. Paugam, Luc, 2011. "Valorisation et reporting du goodwill : enjeux théoriques et empiriques," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/8007 edited by Casta, Jean-François.
    9. Thams, Yannick & Alvarado-Vargas, Marcelo J. & Newburry, William, 2016. "Geographical diversification as a predictor of MNC reputations in their home nations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2882-2889.
    10. H. L. Zou & R. C. Zeng & S. X. Zeng & Jonathan J. Shi, 2015. "How Do Environmental Violation Events Harm Corporate Reputation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 836-854, December.
    11. Antoaneta P Petkova, 2016. "Standing Out or Blending In? The Formation of New Firms’ Legitimacy and Reputation under Different Levels of Market Uncertainty," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 22-34, February.
    12. Muazza Muazza & Akhmad Habibi & Amirul Mukminin, 2023. "The Socially Responsible Human Resources Management and Its Impacts on the Organizational Legitimacy: The Case of Indonesian Employees," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 162-177.
    13. Jerayr J. Haleblian & Michael D. Pfarrer & Jason T. Kiley, 2017. "High-Reputation Firms and Their Differential Acquisition Behaviors," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 2237-2254, November.
    14. Timothy Werner, 2015. "Gaining Access by Doing Good: The Effect of Sociopolitical Reputation on Firm Participation in Public Policy Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(8), pages 1989-2011, August.
    15. Al-Kilani, Shaymaa & El Hedhli, Kamel, 2021. "How do restaurant atmospherics influence restaurant authenticity? An integrative framework and empirical evidence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Aray, Yulia & Dikova, Desislava & Garanina, Tatiana & Veselova, Anna, 2021. "The hunt for international legitimacy: Examining the relationship between internationalization, state ownership, location and CSR reporting of Russian firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    17. Gross, Hellen P. & Ingerfurth, Stefan & Willems, Jurgen, 2021. "Employees as reputation advocates: Dimensions of employee job satisfaction explaining employees’ recommendation intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 405-413.
    18. Adelaide Martins & Delfina Gomes & Manuel Castelo Branco, 2020. "Managing Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure: An Accountability vs. Impression Management Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Redler Joern & Morschheuser Petra, 2024. "Three Root Causes for the Impasse in Reputation Measurement for Higher Education Institutions," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 52(2), pages 26-45.
    20. Damien Chaney & Renaud Lunardo & Rémi Mencarelli, 2018. "Consumption experience: past, present and future," Post-Print hal-01951670, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1189-:d:317515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.