IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p10094-d455551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Footprint Assessment of Construction Waste Packaging Using the Package-to-Product Indicator

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Pešta

    (Department of Environmental Chemistry, Faculty of Environmental Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Markéta Šerešová

    (Department of Environmental Chemistry, Faculty of Environmental Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Vladimír Kočí

    (Department of Environmental Chemistry, Faculty of Environmental Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The environmental impacts of buildings are based on the construction products, which together with their packaging can be assessed as one product system. To reduce the environmental impacts of buildings, the products and their packaging need to be optimised and analysed using environmental assessment. The purpose of this study is to assess the packaging related to the product according to the Life Cycle Assessment method. The environmental assessment was performed using the Product Environmental Footprint methodology, version 3.0. To compare the primary, secondary, and tertiary packaging, the results of the climate change indicator were used as a base to calculate the Package-to-Product (PtP) indicator. Among the considered scenarios to handle the waste packaging (landfilling scenario, material recovery scenario, energy recovery scenario, and the mixed scenario), the material recovery scenario is the most preferable and, for most of the packaging materials, the scenario with the lowest impact. Following the PtP result, the secondary packaging in the roof tile system has a significant share of the impact of the whole system (16% for the energy recovery scenario). Moreover, the results confirm the PtP indicator as the appropriate indicator to analyse the environmental impacts of construction products.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Pešta & Markéta Šerešová & Vladimír Kočí, 2020. "Carbon Footprint Assessment of Construction Waste Packaging Using the Package-to-Product Indicator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10094-:d:455551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiu Chuen Onn & Kim Hung Mo & Mohammed K. H. Radwan & Wen Hong Liew & Chee Guan Ng & Sumiani Yusoff, 2019. "Strength, Carbon Footprint and Cost Considerations of Mortar Blends with High Volume Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Thiago Melo Grabois & Lucas Rosse Caldas & Nathália Rodrigues Julião & Romildo Dias Toledo Filho, 2020. "An Experimental and Environmental Evaluation of Mortars with Recycled Demolition Waste from a Hospital Implosion in Rio de Janeiro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Ahmad Faiz Abd Rashid & Juferi Idris & Sumiani Yusoff, 2017. "Environmental Impact Analysis on Residential Building in Malaysia Using Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Jan Pešta & Tereza Pavlů & Kristina Fořtová & Vladimír Kočí, 2020. "Sustainable Masonry Made from Recycled Aggregates: LCA Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. José Adolfo Lozano-Miralles & Manuel Jesús Hermoso-Orzáez & Carmen Martínez-García & José Ignacio Rojas-Sola, 2018. "Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Traditional Clay Bricks Mixed with Organic Waste Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Riccardo Accorsi & Giulia Baruffaldi & Riccardo Manzini & Chiara Pini, 2019. "Environmental Impacts of Reusable Transport Items: A Case Study of Pallet Pooling in a Retailer Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah C. Andersen & Harpa Birgisdottir & Morten Birkved, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessments of Circular Economy in the Built Environment—A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-31, June.
    2. Jaime A. Mesa & Carlos Fúquene-Retamoso & Aníbal Maury-Ramírez, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Jan Pešta & Tereza Pavlů & Kristina Fořtová & Vladimír Kočí, 2020. "Sustainable Masonry Made from Recycled Aggregates: LCA Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Jun-Xi Deng & Xiao Li & Xiao-Juan Li & Tai-Bing Wei, 2023. "Research on the Performance of Recycled-Straw Insulating Concrete and Optimization Design of Matching Ratio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Jan Fořt & Jiří Šál & Jaroslav Žák & Robert Černý, 2020. "Assessment of Wood-Based Fly Ash as Alternative Cement Replacement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Mohammed K. H. Radwan & Chiu Chuen Onn & Kim Hung Mo & Soon Poh Yap & Ren Jie Chin & Sai Hin Lai, 2022. "Sustainable ternary cement blends with high-volume ground granulated blast furnace slag–fly ash," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 4751-4785, April.
    7. Leslie Ayagapin & Jean Philippe Praene & Doorgeshwaree Jaggeshar & Dinesh Surroop, 2021. "Prospective Life Cycle Assessment: Effect of Electricity Decarbonization in Building Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Eloise Leonora Gnoatto & Andreza Kalbusch & Elisa Henning, 2019. "Evaluation of the Environmental and Economic Impacts on the Life Cycle of Different Solutions for Toilet Flush Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, August.
    9. Rayane de Lima Moura Paiva & Lucas Rosse Caldas & Adriana Paiva de Souza Martins & Patricia Brandão de Sousa & Giulia Fea de Oliveira & Romildo Dias Toledo Filho, 2021. "Thermal-Energy Analysis and Life Cycle GHG Emissions Assessments of Innovative Earth-Based Bamboo Plastering Mortars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Hao Yu & Jiaqi Yang & Xipei Kang & Zhe Cong & Siwei Yao, 2022. "Empty Pallet Allocation Optimization in Shipbuilding Using a Pallet Pool System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Suzana Knežević & Dunja Prokić, 2023. "Indicators as a Foundation of Eco-Labelling of Baked Clay Construction Products in the Republic of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Alisson Mendes Rodrigues & Fabiana Pereira da Costa & Suellen Lisboa Dias Beltrão & Jucielle Veras Fernandes & Romualdo Rodrigues Menezes & Gelmires de Araújo Neves, 2021. "Development of Eco-Friendly Mortars Produced with Kaolin Processing Waste: Durability Behavior Viewpoint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Shamir Sakir & Sudharshan N. Raman & Md. Safiuddin & A. B. M. Amrul Kaish & Azrul A. Mutalib, 2020. "Utilization of By-Products and Wastes as Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Structural Mortar for Sustainable Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-35, May.
    14. Lucas Caon Menegatti & Letícia Ikeda Castrillon Fernandez & Lucas Rosse Caldas & Marco Pepe & Francesco Pittau & Giulio Zani & Marco Carlo Rampini & Julien Michels & Romildo Dias Toledo Filho & Enzo M, 2022. "Environmental Performance of Deconstructable Concrete Beams Made with Recycled Aggregates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    15. Qing Yin & Muhan Yu & Xueliang Ma & Ying Liu & Xunzhi Yin, 2023. "The Role of Straw Materials in Energy-Efficient Buildings: Current Perspectives and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Marina Nikolić Topalović & Milenko Stanković & Goran Ćirović & Dragan Pamučar, 2018. "Comparison of the Applied Measures on the Simulated Scenarios for the Sustainable Building Construction through Carbon Footprint Emissions—Case Study of Building Construction in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Leslie Ayagapin & Jean Philippe Praene, 2020. "Environmental Overcost of Single Family Houses in Insular Context: A Comparative LCA Study of Reunion Island and France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Francesco Asdrubali & Gianluca Grazieschi & Marta Roncone & Francesca Thiebat & Corrado Carbonaro, 2023. "Sustainability of Building Materials: Embodied Energy and Embodied Carbon of Masonry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-28, February.
    19. Najoua Lakhmi & Evren Sahin & Yves Dallery, 2022. "Modelling the Returnable Transport Items (RTI) Short-Term Planning Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Fatima Ezzahra Achamrah & Fouad Riane & Evren Sahin & Sabine Limbourg, 2022. "An Artificial-Immune-System-Based Algorithm Enhanced with Deep Reinforcement Learning for Solving Returnable Transport Item Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-29, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10094-:d:455551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.