IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7723-d415600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Cooking Based on a 3 kW Air-Forced Multifuel Gasification Stove Using Alternative Fuels Obtained from Agricultural Wastes

Author

Listed:
  • Elías Hurtado Pérez

    (Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Ingeniería Energética, Universitat Politécnica de Valencia UPV, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Oscar Mulumba Ilunga

    (Mechanical Department, Higher Institution of Applied Techniques ISTA, Kinshasa, Congo
    Centre for Studies and Research on Renewable Energy Kitsisa Khonde CERERK, Kinshasa, Congo)

  • David Alfonso Solar

    (Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Ingeniería Energética, Universitat Politécnica de Valencia UPV, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • María Cristina Moros Gómez

    (Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Ingeniería Energética, Universitat Politécnica de Valencia UPV, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Paula Bastida-Molina

    (Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Ingeniería Energética, Universitat Politécnica de Valencia UPV, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

In this research work, a 3 kW stove based on biomass gasification, together with a fuel obtained from agriculture wastes as an alternative to the commonly used charcoal, have been developed looking for sustainable cooking in poor communities. Alternative fuel (BSW) are briquettes obtained by carbonization and densification of agricultural solid wastes. Two laboratory methods, water boil test (WBT) and controlled kitchen test (CCT) were used to analyze the performance of this approach by comparing the proposed improved stove (ICS-G) with the traditional one (TCS), when using both types of fuels: charcoal and BSW. Results indicate that consumption of charcoal decreases by 61% using the improved ICS-G stove instead of the traditional TCS. Similar fuel savings are obtained when using BSW fuels. BSW fuel allows for a carbon monoxide (CO) emission reduction of 41% and 67%, and fine particles (PM) in a 84% and 93%, during the high and low power phases of the tests, respectively. Use of BSW fuel and ICS-G stove instead of the TCS stove with charcoal, provides a cooking time reduction of 18%, savings of $353.5 per year per family in the purchase of fuel, and an emission reduction of 3.2 t CO 2 /year.family.

Suggested Citation

  • Elías Hurtado Pérez & Oscar Mulumba Ilunga & David Alfonso Solar & María Cristina Moros Gómez & Paula Bastida-Molina, 2020. "Sustainable Cooking Based on a 3 kW Air-Forced Multifuel Gasification Stove Using Alternative Fuels Obtained from Agricultural Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7723-:d:415600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7723/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7723/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Panwar, 2009. "Design and performance evaluation of energy efficient biomass gasifier based cookstove on multi fuels," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 14(7), pages 627-633, October.
    2. Maes, Wouter H. & Verbist, Bruno, 2012. "Increasing the sustainability of household cooking in developing countries: Policy implications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4204-4221.
    3. Gudina Terefe Tucho & Sanderine Nonhebel, 2015. "Bio-Wastes as an Alternative Household Cooking Energy Source in Ethiopia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Elisabeth Dresen & Ben DeVries & Martin Herold & Louis Verchot & Robert Müller, 2014. "Fuelwood Savings and Carbon Emission Reductions by the Use of Improved Cooking Stoves in an Afromontane Forest, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-21, September.
    5. N. Panwar & A. Kurchania & N. Rathore, 2009. "Mitigation of greenhouse gases by adoption of improved biomass cookstoves," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 569-578, August.
    6. Berrueta, Víctor M. & Edwards, Rufus D. & Masera, Omar R., 2008. "Energy performance of wood-burning cookstoves in Michoacan, Mexico," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 859-870.
    7. Jacopo Barbieri & Fabio Parigi & Fabio Riva & Emanuela Colombo, 2018. "Laboratory Testing of the Innovative Low-Cost Mewar Angithi Insert for Improving Energy Efficiency of Cooking Tasks on Three-Stone Fires in Critical Contexts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Yixiang Zhang & Zongxi Zhang & Yuguang Zhou & Renjie Dong, 2018. "The Influences of Various Testing Conditions on the Evaluation of Household Biomass Pellet Fuel Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-11, May.
    9. James K. Gitau & Cecilia Sundberg & Ruth Mendum & Jane Mutune & Mary Njenga, 2019. "Use of Biochar-Producing Gasifier Cookstove Improves Energy Use Efficiency and Indoor Air Quality in Rural Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Ndindeng, Sali Atanga & Wopereis, Marco & Sanyang, Sidi & Futakuchi, Koichi, 2019. "Evaluation of fan-assisted rice husk fuelled gasifier cookstoves for application in sub-Sahara Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 924-935.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed Moustapha Mfokeu & Elie Virgile Chrysostome & Jean-Pierre Gueyie & Olivier Ebenezer Mun Ngapna, 2023. "Consumer Motivation behind the Use of Ecological Charcoal in Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malla, Sunil & Timilsina, Govinda R, 2014. "Household cooking fuel choice and adoption of improved cookstoves in developing countries : a review," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6903, The World Bank.
    2. Arora, Pooja & Jain, Suresh, 2016. "A review of chronological development in cookstove assessment methods: Challenges and way forward," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 203-220.
    3. Vahlne, Niklas & Ahlgren, Erik O., 2014. "Policy implications for improved cook stove programs—A case study of the importance of village fuel use variations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 484-495.
    4. Sutar, Kailasnath B. & Kohli, Sangeeta & Ravi, M.R. & Ray, Anjan, 2015. "Biomass cookstoves: A review of technical aspects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1128-1166.
    5. Shengqiang Wei & Yiping Lu & Wei Yang & Yubin Ke & Haibiao Zheng & Lingbo Zhu & Jianfei Tong & Longwei Mei & Shinian Fu & Congju Yao, 2022. "Comparative Research on Ventilation Characteristics of Scattering and Sample Room from Chinese Spallation Neutron Source," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, May.
    6. D'Agostino, Anthony L. & Urpelainen, Johannes & Xu, Alice, 2015. "Socio-economic determinants of charcoal expenditures in Tanzania: Evidence from panel data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 472-481.
    7. Martínez, J. & Martí-Herrero, Jaime & Villacís, S. & Riofrio, A.J. & Vaca, D., 2017. "Analysis of energy, CO2 emissions and economy of the technological migration for clean cooking in Ecuador," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 182-187.
    8. Simons, Andrew M. & Beltramo, Theresa & Blalock, Garrick & Levine, David I., 2017. "Using unobtrusive sensors to measure and minimize Hawthorne effects: Evidence from cookstoves," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 68-80.
    9. Kwofie, E.M. & Ngadi, M. & Sotocinal, S., 2017. "Energy efficiency and emission assessment of a continuous rice husk stove for rice parboiling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 340-349.
    10. Peng, Valerie & Slocum, Alexander, 2020. "Endemic Water and Storm Trash to energy via in-situ processing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Francesco N. Tubiello & Josef Schmidhuber, 2014. "Emissions of greenhouse gases from agriculture and their mitigation," Chapters, in: Raghbendra Jha & Raghav Gaiha & Anil B. Deolalikar (ed.), Handbook on Food, chapter 16, pages 422-442, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Bär, Roger & Reinhard, Jürgen & Ehrensperger, Albrecht & Kiteme, Boniface & Mkunda, Thomas & Wymann von Dach, Susanne, 2021. "The future of charcoal, firewood, and biogas in Kitui County and Kilimanjaro Region: Scenario development for policy support," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Najjar, Yousef S.H. & Kseibi, Musaab M., 2017. "Thermoelectric stoves for poor deprived regions – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 597-602.
    14. Cheng, Shikun & Li, Zifu & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Neupane, Kalidas & Wauthelet, Marc & Huba, Elisabeth-Maria, 2014. "Application of fault tree approach for technical assessment of small-sized biogas systems in Nepal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1372-1381.
    15. Vanschoenwinkel, Janka & Lizin, Sebastien & Swinnen, Gilbert & Azadi, Hossein & Van Passel, Steven, 2014. "Solar cooking in Senegalese villages: An application of best–worst scaling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 447-458.
    16. Andrzej Greinert & Maria Mrówczyńska & Radosław Grech & Wojciech Szefner, 2020. "The Use of Plant Biomass Pellets for Energy Production by Combustion in Dedicated Furnaces," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Harry Hoffmann & Götz Uckert & Constance Rybak & Frieder Graef & Klas Sander & Stefan Sieber, 2018. "Efficiency scenarios of charcoal production and consumption – a village case study from Western Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(4), pages 925-938, August.
    18. Núñez, José & Moctezuma-Sánchez, Miguel F. & Fisher, Elizabeth M. & Berrueta, Víctor M. & Masera, Omar R. & Beltrán, Alberto, 2020. "Natural-draft flow and heat transfer in a plancha-type biomass cookstove," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 727-736.
    19. Berhanu, Mesfin & Jabasingh, S. Anuradha & Kifile, Zebene, 2017. "Expanding sustenance in Ethiopia based on renewable energy resources – A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1035-1045.
    20. Cesare Caputo & Ondřej Mašek, 2021. "SPEAR (Solar Pyrolysis Energy Access Reactor): Theoretical Design and Evaluation of a Small-Scale Low-Cost Pyrolysis Unit for Implementation in Rural Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7723-:d:415600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.