IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i14p5601-d383497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Improvement of PEM Fuel Cell Using Variable Step-Size Incremental Resistance MPPT Technique

Author

Listed:
  • Hegazy Rezk

    (College of Engineering at Wadi Addawaser, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi Addawaser 11991, Saudi Arabia
    Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Minia 61517, Egypt)

  • Ahmed Fathy

    (Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Jouf University, Sakaka 72314, Saudi Arabia
    Electrical Power and Machine Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt)

Abstract

The output power of a fuel cell mainly depends on the operating conditions such as cell temperature and membrane water content. The fuel cell (FC) power versus FC current graph has a unique maximum power point (MPP). The location of the MPP is variable, depending on the operating condition. Consequently, a maximum power point tracker (MPPT) is highly required to ensure that the fuel cell operates at an MPP to increase its performance. In this research work, a variable step-size incremental resistance (VSS-INR) tracking method was suggested to track the MPP of the proton exchange membrane (PEMFC). Most of MPPT methods used with PEMFC require at least three sensors: temperature sensor, water content sensor, and voltage sensor. However, the proposed VSS-INR needs only two sensors: voltage and current sensors. The step size of the VSS-INR is directly proportional to the error signal. Therefore, the step size will become small as the error becomes very small nearby the maximum power point. Accordingly, the accuracy of the VSS-INR tracking method is high in a steady state. To test and validate the VSS-INR, nine different scenarios of operating conditions, including normal operation, only temperature variation, only variation of water content in the membrane, and both variations of temperature and water content simultaneously, were used. The obtained results were compared with previously proposed methods, including particle swarm optimization (PSO), perturb and observe (P&O), and sliding mode (SM), under different operating conditions. The results of the comparison confirmed the superiority of VSS-INR compared with other methods in terms of the tracking efficiency and steady-state fluctuations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hegazy Rezk & Ahmed Fathy, 2020. "Performance Improvement of PEM Fuel Cell Using Variable Step-Size Incremental Resistance MPPT Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5601-:d:383497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doudou N. Luta & Atanda K. Raji, 2019. "Fuzzy Rule-Based and Particle Swarm Optimisation MPPT Techniques for a Fuel Cell Stack," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Al-Baghdadi, Maher A.R. Sadiq, 2005. "Modelling of proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance based on semi-empirical equations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 1587-1599.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hegazy Rezk & Mohammed Mazen Alhato & Mujahed Al-Dhaifallah & Soufiene Bouallègue, 2021. "A Sine Cosine Algorithm-Based Fractional MPPT for Thermoelectric Generation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. N. Kanagaraj & Hegazy Rezk & Mohamed R. Gomaa, 2020. "A Variable Fractional Order Fuzzy Logic Control Based MPPT Technique for Improving Energy Conversion Efficiency of Thermoelectric Power Generator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Chen, Jinzhou & He, Hongwen & Wang, Ya-Xiong & Quan, Shengwei & Zhang, Zhendong & Wei, Zhongbao & Han, Ruoyan, 2024. "Research on energy management strategy for fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles based on improved dynamic programming and air supply optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    4. Phatiphat Thounthong & Pongsiri Mungporn & Babak Nahid-Mobarakeh & Nicu Bizon & Serge Pierfederici & Damien Guilbert, 2021. "Improved Adaptive Hamiltonian Control Law for Constant Power Load Stability Issue in DC Microgrid: Case Study for Multiphase Interleaved Fuel Cell Boost Converter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Mohammed Yousri Silaa & Mohamed Derbeli & Oscar Barambones & Cristian Napole & Ali Cheknane & José María Gonzalez De Durana, 2021. "An Efficient and Robust Current Control for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Power System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Rezk, Hegazy & Aly, Mokhtar & Fathy, Ahmed, 2021. "A novel strategy based on recent equilibrium optimizer to enhance the performance of PEM fuel cell system through optimized fuzzy logic MPPT," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Hegazy Rezk & Mokhtar Aly & Rania M. Ghoniem, 2023. "Robust Fuzzy Logic MPPT Using Gradient-Based Optimization for PEMFC Power System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rezk, Hegazy & Aly, Mokhtar & Fathy, Ahmed, 2021. "A novel strategy based on recent equilibrium optimizer to enhance the performance of PEM fuel cell system through optimized fuzzy logic MPPT," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Theofilos Kamperidis & Asimina Tremouli & Antonis Peppas & Gerasimos Lyberatos, 2022. "A 2D Modelling Approach for Predicting the Response of a Two-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell to Substrate Concentration and Electrolyte Conductivity Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Mohamed Derbeli & Asma Charaabi & Oscar Barambones & Cristian Napole, 2021. "High-Performance Tracking for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell System PEMFC Using Model Predictive Control," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Nicu Bizon & Mircea Raceanu & Emmanouel Koudoumas & Adriana Marinoiu & Emmanuel Karapidakis & Elena Carcadea, 2020. "Renewable/Fuel Cell Hybrid Power System Operation Using Two Search Controllers of the Optimal Power Needed on the DC Bus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Mokhtar Aly & Emad A. Mohamed & Hegazy Rezk & Ahmed M. Nassef & Mostafa A. Elhosseini & Ahmed Shawky, 2023. "An Improved Optimally Designed Fuzzy Logic-Based MPPT Method for Maximizing Energy Extraction of PEMFC in Green Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Moreira, Marcos V. & da Silva, Gisele E., 2009. "A practical model for evaluating the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1734-1741.
    7. Mohamed Derbeli & Oscar Barambones & Jose Antonio Ramos-Hernanz & Lassaad Sbita, 2019. "Real-Time Implementation of a Super Twisting Algorithm for PEM Fuel Cell Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Mohamed Tolba & Hegazy Rezk & Ahmed A. Zaki Diab & Mujahed Al-Dhaifallah, 2018. "A Novel Robust Methodology Based Salp Swarm Algorithm for Allocation and Capacity of Renewable Distributed Generators on Distribution Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, September.
    9. Khlid Ben Hamad & Doudou N. Luta & Atanda K. Raji, 2021. "A Grid-Tied Fuel Cell Multilevel Inverter with Low Harmonic Distortions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Bonan Huang & Chaoming Zheng & Qiuye Sun & Ruixue Hu, 2019. "Optimal Economic Dispatch for Integrated Power and Heating Systems Considering Transmission Losses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Zuo, Jian & Lv, Hong & Zhou, Daming & Xue, Qiong & Jin, Liming & Zhou, Wei & Yang, Daijun & Zhang, Cunman, 2021. "Deep learning based prognostic framework towards proton exchange membrane fuel cell for automotive application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    12. Muhammad Majid Gulzar, 2023. "Maximum Power Point Tracking of a Grid Connected PV Based Fuel Cell System Using Optimal Control Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Mohammed Yousri Silaa & Mohamed Derbeli & Oscar Barambones & Ali Cheknane, 2020. "Design and Implementation of High Order Sliding Mode Control for PEMFC Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Rezk, Hegazy & Dousoky, Gamal M., 2016. "Technical and economic analysis of different configurations of stand-alone hybrid renewable power systems – A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 941-953.
    15. Mohamed Louzazni & Sameer Al-Dahidi & Marco Mussetta, 2020. "Fuel Cell Characteristic Curve Approximation Using the Bézier Curve Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Valverde-Isorna, L. & Ali, D. & Hogg, D. & Abdel-Wahab, M., 2016. "Modelling the performance of wind–hydrogen energy systems: Case study the Hydrogen Office in Scotland/UK," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1313-1332.
    17. Haji, Shaker, 2011. "Analytical modeling of PEM fuel cell i–V curve," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 451-458.
    18. Fathy, Ahmed & Elaziz, Mohamed Abd & Alharbi, Abdullah G., 2020. "A novel approach based on hybrid vortex search algorithm and differential evolution for identifying the optimal parameters of PEM fuel cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1833-1845.
    19. Gomes, R.S. & De Bortoli, A.L., 2016. "A three-dimensional mathematical model for the anode of a direct ethanol fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1292-1301.
    20. Hannan, M.A. & Azidin, F.A. & Mohamed, A., 2014. "Hybrid electric vehicles and their challenges: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 135-150.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5601-:d:383497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.