IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i10p4029-d358230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Building Project-Based Industrialized Construction Maturity Model Involving Organizational Enablers: A Multi-Case Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Guangbin Wang

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Huan Liu

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Heng Li

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Room ZN1002, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Xiaochun Luo

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Room ZN1002, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Jiaxi Liu

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Industrialized construction (IC) as a promising construction mode has been increasingly adopted in China due to its advantages of enhancing productivity and reducing the labor intensiveness in the construction industry. An objective and systematic evaluation of the IC mode is essential by clarifying the current weak areas in application and improving project performance. The meager existing studies have considered evaluating the IC maturity of prefabricated construction projects from the perspective of project governance. This study proposed an industrialized construction maturity model (ICMM) involving organizational enablers by employing the framework of the well-established European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) excellence model. The evaluation indicator system consisting of two parts (i.e., “enablers” and “results”) were abstracted by a literature review and expert interviews. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach was used to weight the indicators. The maturity of IC projects was rated as four levels (i.e., initial, upgraded, integrated, and optimal levels). The proposed ICMM was validated by conducting a multi-case study, four typical building projects that adopted prefabricated construction techniques in Shanghai were selected and evaluated by the proposed ICMM. Results showed that the ICMM can objectively and comprehensively realize the status quo of IC projects and help managers to identify weak areas of the current IC projects and performance improvement paths from the perspective of project governance. The ICMM was also evaluated to demonstrate its applicability and reliability through expert interviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangbin Wang & Huan Liu & Heng Li & Xiaochun Luo & Jiaxi Liu, 2020. "A Building Project-Based Industrialized Construction Maturity Model Involving Organizational Enablers: A Multi-Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-35, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4029-:d:358230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4029/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4029/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Long Li & Zhongfu Li & Guangdong Wu & Xiaodan Li, 2018. "Critical Success Factors for Project Planning and Control in Prefabrication Housing Production: A China Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Kangning Liu & Yikun Su & Shoujian Zhang, 2018. "Evaluating Supplier Management Maturity in Prefabricated Construction Project-Survey Analysis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Myung-Hun Kim & Eul-Bum Lee & Han-Suk Choi, 2019. "A Forecast and Mitigation Model of Construction Performance by Assessing Detailed Engineering Maturity at Key Milestones for Offshore EPC Mega-Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Johan Larsson & Per Erik Eriksson & Thomas Olofsson & Peter Simonsson, 2014. "Industrialized construction in the Swedish infrastructure sector: core elements and barriers," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 83-96, February.
    5. Jingxiao Zhang & Hui Li & Steve Hsueh-Ming Wang, 2017. "Analysis and Potential Application of the Maturity of Growth Management in the Developing Construction Industry of a Province of China: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-36, January.
    6. Christopher J. Willis & Jeffrey H. Rankin, 2012. "The construction industry macro maturity model (CIM3): theoretical underpinnings," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(4), pages 382-402, April.
    7. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2012. "Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-4614-3597-6, July-Dece.
    8. Dandan He & Zhongfu Li & Chunlin Wu & Xin Ning, 2018. "An E-Commerce Platform for Industrialized Construction Procurement Based on BIM and Linked Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Xiaolin Zhai & Richard Reed & Anthony Mills, 2014. "Factors impeding the offsite production of housing construction in China: an investigation of current practice," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 40-52, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Scherz & Bernd Markus Zunk & Christian Steinmann & Helmuth Kreiner, 2022. "How to Assess Sustainable Planning Processes of Buildings? A Maturity Assessment Model Approach for Designers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Sławomir Wawak & Žanesa Ljevo & Mladen Vukomanović, 2020. "Understanding the Key Quality Factors in Construction Projects—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Solomon Dargie Chekole & Walter Timo de Vries & Pamela Durán-Díaz & Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of the Urban Cadastral System in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Ankur Tayal & Saurabh Agrawal & Rajan Yadav, 2024. "Implementation of industry 4.0 in construction industry: a review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(9), pages 4163-4182, September.
    5. Renata Turisová & Hana Pačaiová & Zuzana Kotianová & Anna Nagyová & Michal Hovanec & Peter Korba, 2021. "Evaluation of eMaintenance Application Based on the New Version of the EFQM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Scherz & Bernd Markus Zunk & Christian Steinmann & Helmuth Kreiner, 2022. "How to Assess Sustainable Planning Processes of Buildings? A Maturity Assessment Model Approach for Designers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Shengxi Zhang & Zhongfu Li & Shengbin Ma & Long Li & Mengqi Yuan, 2022. "Critical Factors Influencing Interface Management of Prefabricated Building Projects: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Lei Jiang & Zhongfu Li & Long Li & Tiankun Li & Yunli Gao, 2018. "A Framework of Industrialized Building Assessment in China Based on the Structural Equation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    5. Martina Artmann, 2013. "Response-Efficiency-Assessment: A Conceptual Framework For Rating Policy'S Efficiency To Meet Sustainable Development On The Example Of Soil Sealing Management," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 1-33.
    6. Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Mohamed Elseknidy & Fakunle Samuel Kayode, 2023. "Radio frequency identification implementation model for sustainable development: A structural equation modeling approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1824-1844, June.
    7. Mohammad Reza Salehizadeh & Mahdi Amidi Koohbijari & Hassan Nouri & Akın Taşcıkaraoğlu & Ozan Erdinç & João P. S. Catalão, 2019. "Bi-Objective Optimization Model for Optimal Placement of Thyristor-Controlled Series Compensator Devices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Gözaçan Nazlıcan & Lafci Çisem, 2020. "Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators of Logistics Firms," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 24-32, February.
    9. Jiabin Liu & Ji Han, 2017. "Does a Certain Rule Exist in the Long-Term Change of a City’s Livability? Evidence from New York, Tokyo, and Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Clara Moreira Senne & Josiane Palma Lima & Fábio Favaretto, 2021. "An Index for the Sustainability of Integrated Urban Transport and Logistics: The Case Study of São Paulo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Seungho Kim & Dong-Eun Lee & Yonggu Kim & Sangyong Kim, 2020. "Development and Application of Precast Concrete Double Wall System to Improve Productivity of Retaining Wall Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.
    12. Lei Jiang & Zhongfu Li & Long Li & Yunli Gao, 2018. "Constraints on the Promotion of Prefabricated Construction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1, July.
    13. Reza Esmaili & Seyedeh Atefeh Karipour, 2024. "Comparison of weighting methods of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in evaluation of flood hazard index," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(9), pages 8619-8638, July.
    14. Xianmei Wang & Hanhui Hu, 2017. "Sustainability in Chinese Higher Educational Institutions’ Social Science Research: A Performance Interface toward Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Satheeskumar Navaratnam, 2022. "Selecting a Suitable Sustainable Construction Method for Australian High-Rise Building: A Multi-Criteria Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Pei Dang & Zhanwen Niu & Shang Gao & Lei Hou & Guomin Zhang, 2020. "Critical Factors Influencing the Sustainable Construction Capability in Prefabrication of Chinese Construction Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Md Monjurul Islam & Tofael Ahamed & Ryozo Noguchi, 2018. "Land Suitability and Insurance Premiums: A GIS-based Multicriteria Analysis Approach for Sustainable Rice Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, May.
    18. Roberta Mele & Giuliano Poli, 2017. "The Effectiveness of Geographical Data in Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Landscape Services †," Data, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-11, February.
    19. Chatterjee, Sidharta, 2017. "A Primer on Social Knowledge," MPRA Paper 81105, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Sep 2017.
    20. Mariia Dushenko & Clemet Thærie Bjorbæk & Kenn Steger-Jensen, 2018. "Application of a Sustainability Model for Assessing the Relocation of a Container Terminal: A Case Study of Kristiansand Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4029-:d:358230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.