IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i4p985-d205928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Factors, and Indicators for Measuring Students’ Sustainable Engagement in e-Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Jeongju Lee

    (Department of Education, College of Education, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea)

  • Hae-Deok Song

    (Department of Education, College of Education, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea)

  • Ah Jeong Hong

    (Department of Education, College of Education, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea)

Abstract

The topic of engagement has been attracting increasing amounts of attention in the field of e-learning. Research shows that multifarious benefits occur when students are engaged in their own learning, including increased motivation and achievement. Previous studies have proposed many scales for measuring student engagement. However, very few have been developed to measure engagement in e-learning environments. Thus, developing an instrument for measuring student engagement in e-learning environments is the purpose of this study. The participants of this study were 737 Korean online university students. Initial items were designed based on the literature. The instrument items were reduced from an initial 48 to 24 items after obtaining expert opinion and then validity and reliability analysis. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were also conducted. Six factors, including psychological motivation, peer collaboration, cognitive problem solving, interaction with instructors, community support, and learning management emerged in the 24-item scale. This scale is expected to help instructors and curriculum designers to find conditions to improve student engagement in e-learning environments, and ultimately prevent students from dropping out of online courses.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeongju Lee & Hae-Deok Song & Ah Jeong Hong, 2019. "Exploring Factors, and Indicators for Measuring Students’ Sustainable Engagement in e-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:985-:d:205928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/985/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/985/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilmar Schaufeli & Marisa Salanova & Vicente González-romá & Arnold Bakker, 2002. "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 71-92, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tidarat Luangrungruang & Urachart Kokaew, 2022. "E-Learning Model to Identify the Learning Styles of Hearing-Impaired Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Eduard Edelhauser & Lucian Lupu-Dima, 2020. "Is Romania Prepared for eLearning during the COVID-19 Pandemic?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-30, July.
    3. William Villegas-Ch & Xavier Palacios-Pacheco & Sergio Luján-Mora, 2019. "Application of a Smart City Model to a Traditional University Campus with a Big Data Architecture: A Sustainable Smart Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-28, May.
    4. Asheena Singh-Pillay, 2023. "Pre-Service Teachers’ Experience of Learning about Sustainability in Technology Education in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Bumho Lee & Jinwoo Kim, 2023. "Managing Social Presence in Collaborative Learning with Agent Facilitation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Sohee Kim & Dae-Jin Kim, 2021. "Structural Relationship of Key Factors for Student Satisfaction and Achievement in Asynchronous Online Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Kuo-Kuang Fan & Xue-Hui Li & Meng-Jia Lu, 2020. "Sustainability Research on Promoting the Inheritance of Lacquer Art Based on the E-learning Mode—Case Study of the Popularization of Lacquer Art Education in Primary Schools in Guangzhou Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Alkhaser V. Sappayani & Glein B. Bustamante, 2024. "Home Study and Learning Motivations of Students Major in Social Studies among Higher Education Institution," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3), pages 2684-2700, March.
    9. Annchen Mielmann, 2021. "Being Innovative in Running an Online Food Research Project in Consumer Sciences during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Alzbeta Kucharcikova & Martin Miciak & Eva Malichova & Maria Durisova & Emese Tokarcikova, 2019. "The Motivation of Students at Universities as a Prerequisite of the Education’s Sustainability within the Business Value Generation Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-25, October.
    11. Younyoung Choi & Jigeun Kim, 2021. "Learning Analytics for Diagnosing Cognitive Load in E-Learning Using Bayesian Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Dianne Forbes & Dilani Gedera & Maggie Hartnett & Ashwini Datt & Cheryl Brown, 2023. "Sustainable Strategies for Teaching and Learning Online," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Prakash Singh & Ibrahim Alhassan & Nasser Binsaif & Thamer Alhussain, 2023. "Standard Measuring of E-Learning to Assess the Quality Level of E-Learning Outcomes: Saudi Electronic University Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-28, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mader, Xana & Santos, Joana & Gonçalves, Gabriela, 2018. "Job Satisfaction In A Tourist Resort In Portugal," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 6(3), pages 314-325.
    2. Serdar Çop & Victor Oluwafemi Olorunsola & Uju Violet Alola, 2021. "Achieving environmental sustainability through green transformational leadership policy: Can green team resilience help?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 671-682, January.
    3. Onintze Letona-Ibañez & Silvia Martinez-Rodriguez & Nuria Ortiz-Marques & Maria Carrasco & Alejandro Amillano, 2021. "Job Crafting and Work Engagement: The Mediating Role of Work Meaning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Paula van Dommelen & Jennifer K Coffeng & Hidde P van der Ploeg & Allard J van der Beek & Cécile R L Boot & Ingrid J M Hendriksen, 2016. "Objectively Measured Total and Occupational Sedentary Time in Three Work Settings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Viktoria Maria Baumeister & Leonie Petra Kuen & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    6. Shilei Zhang & Rui Shi & Liping Yun & Xuefei Li & Yun Wang & Hongbin He & Danmin Miao, 2015. "Self-regulation and Study-Related Health Outcomes: A Structural Equation Model of Regulatory Mode Orientations, Academic Burnout and Engagement Among University Students," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 585-599, September.
    7. Umair Ahmed & Abdul Halim Abdul Majid & Md Lazim Mohd Zin, 2016. "Meaningful Work and Work Engagement: A Relationship Demanding Urgent Attention," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(8), pages 116-122, August.
    8. Tilahun Kidane Diko & Shabnam Saxena, 2023. "Antecedents and outcome of employee engagement: Empirical study of Ethiopian public higher education institutions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-30, August.
    9. Ginés D. López-García & María Carrasco-Poyatos & Rafael Burgueño & Antonio Granero-Gallegos, 2023. "Relationships Between Needs Satisfaction and the Quality of Motivation With Academic Engagement in Pre-Service Physical Education Teachers," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    10. Jari J. Hakanen & Petri Rouvinen & Ilkka Ylhäinen, 2021. "The Impact of Work Engagement on Future Occupational Rankings, Wages, Unemployment, and Disability Pensions—A Register-Based Study of a Representative Sample of Finnish Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    11. María Josefina Peláez & Cristián Coo & Marisa Salanova, 2020. "Facilitating Work Engagement and Performance Through Strengths-Based Micro-coaching: A Controlled Trial Study," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1265-1284, April.
    12. Lise A. Oortmerssen & Marjolein C. J. Caniëls & Marcel F. Assen, 2020. "Coping with Work Stressors and Paving the Way for Flow: Challenge and Hindrance Demands, Humor, and Cynicism," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 2257-2277, August.
    13. Xiuxiu Huang & Zhaoyang Li & Qiaoqin Wan, 2019. "From organisational justice to turnover intention among community nurses: A mediating model," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3957-3965, November.
    14. Charlice Hurst & Lauren Simon & Yongsuhk Jung & Dante Pirouz, 2019. "Are “Bad” Employees Happier Under Bad Bosses? Differing Effects of Abusive Supervision on Low and High Primary Psychopathy Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 1149-1164, September.
    15. Nasser Saad Al Kahtani & Sulphey M. M., 2022. "A Study on How Psychological Capital, Social Capital, Workplace Wellbeing, and Employee Engagement Relate to Task Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    16. Franz Dinar V. Cubillas, 2023. "Challenges of Non-STEM Students in Psychology: Disruptive Learning Dynamics: A Literature Review," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(12), pages 563-570, December.
    17. Gazi Md. Shakhawat Hossain & Md. Nayem Hossen & Md. Sharifur Rahman & Maruf Hasan, 2019. "Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Approach to Examining the Factors’ Affecting Work Life Balance among Female Teachers’: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 3(6), pages 140-152.
    18. Woocheol Kim & Gohar Feroz Khan & Jacob Wood & Muhammad Tariq Mahmood, 2016. "Employee Engagement for Sustainable Organizations: Keyword Analysis Using Social Network Analysis and Burst Detection Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, July.
    19. Abdullah J. Sultan, 2022. "Aligning employees’ work engagement and behavioral performance with internal branding: the missing link of employees’ perceived brand authenticity," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 52-64, March.
    20. Schippers, M.C., 2017. "IKIGAI: Reflection on Life Goals Optimizes Performance and Happiness," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA-2017-070-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:985-:d:205928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.