IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p7229-d298662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Design Structure Method for Project Schedule Development under Rework Risks

Author

Listed:
  • Guofeng Ma

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Jianyao Jia

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Tiancheng Zhu

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Shan Jiang

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

In order to overcome the difficulty in quantifying rework by traditional project schedule management tools, this study proposes an innovative method, namely improved Critical Chain Design Structure Matrix (ICCDSM). From the perspective of information flow, the authors firstly make assumptions on activity parameters and interactions between activities. After that, a genetic algorithm is employed to reorder the activity sequence, and a banding algorithm with consideration of resource constraints is used to identify concurrent activities. Then potential criticality is proposed to measure the importance of each activity, and the rework impact area is implicated to indicate potential rework windows. Next, two methods for calculating project buffer are employed. A simulation methodology is used to verify the proposed method. The simulation results illustrate that the ICCDSM method is capable of quantifying and visualizing rework and its impact, decreases iterations, and improves the completion probability. In this vein, this study provides a novel framework for rework management, which offers some insights for researchers and managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Guofeng Ma & Jianyao Jia & Tiancheng Zhu & Shan Jiang, 2019. "A Critical Design Structure Method for Project Schedule Development under Rework Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7229-:d:298662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7229/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7229/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert P. Smith & Steven D. Eppinger, 1997. "A Predictive Model of Sequential Iteration in Engineering Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(8), pages 1104-1120, August.
    2. Tukel, Oya I. & Rom, Walter O. & Eksioglu, Sandra Duni, 2006. "An investigation of buffer sizing techniques in critical chain scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 401-416, July.
    3. Eppinger, Steven D. & Browning, Tyson R., 2012. "Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262017520, April.
    4. Donald L. Keefer & William A. Verdini, 1993. "Better Estimation of PERT Activity Time Parameters," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(9), pages 1086-1091, September.
    5. Junguang Zhang & Xiwei Song & Hongyu Chen & Ruixia (Sandy) Shi, 2015. "Optimisation of critical chain sequencing based on activities’ information flow interactions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(20), pages 6231-6241, October.
    6. Lucas Martins Ikeziri & Fernando Bernardi de Souza & Mahesh C. Gupta & Paula de Camargo Fiorini, 2019. "Theory of constraints: review and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 5068-5102, August.
    7. Zhang, Junguang & Song, Xiwei & Díaz, Estrella, 2016. "Project buffer sizing of a critical chain based on comprehensive resource tightness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 174-182.
    8. Junguang Zhang & Ruixia Shi & Estrella Diaz, 2015. "Dynamic monitoring and control of software project effort based on an effort buffer," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(9), pages 1555-1565, September.
    9. Tyson R. Browning, 1999. "Sources of schedule risk in complex system development," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3), pages 129-142.
    10. P. E. D. Love & H. Li, 2000. "Overcoming the problems associated with quality certification," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 139-149.
    11. Hadi Moradi & Shahram Shadrokh, 2019. "A robust scheduling for the multi-mode project scheduling problem with a given deadline under uncertainty of activity duration," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(10), pages 3138-3167, May.
    12. Richard J. Schonberger, 1981. "Why Projects Are “Always” Late: A Rationale Based on Manual Simulation of a PERT/CPM Network," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 66-70, October.
    13. Esra Aleisa & Li Lin, 2009. "Sequencing of design tasks based on the degree of permissible concurrency," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 367-387.
    14. Junguang Zhang & Xiwei Song & Estrella Díaz, 2017. "Critical chain project buffer sizing based on resource constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 671-683, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guofeng Ma & Shan Jiang & Tiancheng Zhu & Jianyao Jia, 2019. "A Novel Method of Developing Construction Projects Schedule under Rework Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Zhang, Junguang & Song, Xiwei & Díaz, Estrella, 2016. "Project buffer sizing of a critical chain based on comprehensive resource tightness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 174-182.
    3. She, Bingling & Chen, Bo & Hall, Nicholas G., 2021. "Buffer sizing in critical chain project management by network decomposition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Junguang Zhang & Xiwei Song & Estrella Díaz, 2017. "Critical chain project buffer sizing based on resource constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 671-683, February.
    5. Cui, Nanfang & Demeulemeester, Erik & Bie, Li, 2016. "Incorporation of activity sensitivity measures into buffer management to manage project schedule riskAuthor-Name: Hu, Xuejun," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 717-727.
    6. Wendi Tian & Erik Demeulemeester, 2014. "Railway scheduling reduces the expected project makespan over roadrunner scheduling in a multi-mode project scheduling environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 271-291, February.
    7. Junguang Zhang & Xiwei Song & Hongyu Chen & Ruixia (Sandy) Shi, 2016. "Determination of critical chain project buffer based on information flow interactions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(9), pages 1146-1157, September.
    8. Yan Zhao & Nanfang Cui & Wendi Tian, 2020. "A two-stage approach for the critical chain project rescheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 67-95, February.
    9. Junguang Zhang & Dan Wan, 2021. "Determination of early warning time window for bottleneck resource buffer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(1), pages 289-305, May.
    10. Lin, Jun & Qian, Yanjun & Cui, Wentian & Goh, Thong Ngee, 2015. "An effective approach for scheduling coupled activities in development projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 97-108.
    11. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Inayat Ullah & Dunbing Tang & Qi Wang & Leilei Yin, 2017. "Least Risky Change Propagation Path Analysis in Product Design Process," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 379-391, July.
    13. Xuejun Hu & Jianjiang Wang & Kaijun Leng, 2019. "The Interaction Between Critical Chain Sequencing, Buffer Sizing, and Reactive Actions in a CC/BM Framework," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(03), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Mohammadreza Sharifi Ghazvini & Vahidreza Ghezavati & Sadigh Raissi & Ahmad Makui, 2017. "An Integrated Efficiency–Risk Approach in Sustainable Project Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi & Zwikael, Ofer, 2021. "Integrating risk into estimations of project activities' time and cost: A stratified approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 482-490.
    16. Manuel E. Sosa & Jürgen Mihm & Tyson R. Browning, 2013. "Linking Cyclicality and Product Quality," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 473-491, July.
    17. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    18. Xuejun Hu & Erik Demeulemeester & Nanfang Cui & Jianjiang Wang & Wendi Tian, 2017. "Improved critical chain buffer management framework considering resource costs and schedule stability," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 159-183, June.
    19. Uwe Beyer & Oliver Ullrich, 2022. "Organizational Complexity as a Contributing Factor to Underperformance," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Kamburowski, J., 1997. "New validations of PERT times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 323-328, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7229-:d:298662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.