IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v41y2024i2p247-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project schedule contingency planning: Building on von Bertalanffy's open systems theory and critical systems practice

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Ashkan Zarghami

Abstract

The research on project schedule contingency suffers from three major shortcomings: (1) it only partly reflects the complexity arising from the high interdependencies among project activities; (2) it is predicated on the idea of closed systems and thus does not address the interaction between a project and its environment; and (3) it does not sufficiently inform industry practices. This paper addresses these gaps by conceptually and analytically linking von Bertalanffy's open systems theory and critical systems practice (CSP) to schedule contingency planning. It focuses on buffer management as a common approach to schedule contingency planning and accordingly develops a method to determine the size of time buffers based on the three foundational dimensions of open systems theory. Further, this research provides guidelines to explain how the simultaneous pursuit of the four stages of CSP can assist project managers and decision‐makers in responding to disruptive events.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Ashkan Zarghami, 2024. "Project schedule contingency planning: Building on von Bertalanffy's open systems theory and critical systems practice," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 247-261, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:41:y:2024:i:2:p:247-261
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2965
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rika Preiser, 2019. "Identifying general trends and patterns in complex systems research: An overview of theoretical and practical implications," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 706-714, September.
    2. Cui, Nanfang & Demeulemeester, Erik & Bie, Li, 2016. "Incorporation of activity sensitivity measures into buffer management to manage project schedule riskAuthor-Name: Hu, Xuejun," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 717-727.
    3. Michael C. Jackson, 2021. "Critical systems practice 2: Produce—Constructing a multimethodological intervention strategy," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 594-609, October.
    4. Tukel, Oya I. & Rom, Walter O. & Eksioglu, Sandra Duni, 2006. "An investigation of buffer sizing techniques in critical chain scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 401-416, July.
    5. Wolfgang Hofkirchner, 2019. "Social relations: Building on Ludwig von Bertalanffy," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 263-273, May.
    6. Zhang, Junguang & Song, Xiwei & Díaz, Estrella, 2016. "Project buffer sizing of a critical chain based on comprehensive resource tightness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 174-182.
    7. Thangatur Sukumar Hariharan & L. S. Ganesh & Vijayalakshmi Venkatraman & Piyush Sharma & Vidyasagar Potdar, 2022. "Morphological Analysis of general system–environment complexes: Representation and application," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 218-240, March.
    8. Michael C. Jackson, 2022. "Critical systems practice 3: Intervene—Flexibly executing a multimethodological intervention," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1014-1023, November.
    9. Zhi Chen & Erik Demeulemeester & Sijun Bai & Yuntao Guo, 2020. "A Bayesian approach to set the tolerance limits for a statistical project control method," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(10), pages 3150-3163, May.
    10. Steffen Roth, 2019. "The open theory and its enemy: Implicit moralisation as epistemological obstacle for general systems theory," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 281-288, May.
    11. Erik Persson & Mikael Granberg, 2021. "Implementation through collaborative crisis management and contingency planning: the case of dam failure in Sweden," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1335-1348, October.
    12. Junguang Zhang & Meihua Wang, 2022. "Differential buffer monitoring for critical chain projects based on comprehensive activity reliability," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(9), pages 2064-2079, September.
    13. John J. Kineman & Krupanidhi Srirama & Jennifer Wilby & David Rousseau, 2017. "Strategies for Discovering Scientific Systems Principles," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 527-536, September.
    14. Seyed Ashkan Zarghami & Indra Gunawan & Graciela Corral de Zubielqui & Bassam Baroudi, 2020. "Incorporation of resource reliability into critical chain project management buffer sizing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(20), pages 6130-6144, October.
    15. Michael C. Jackson, 2020. "Critical systems practice 1: Explore—Starting a multimethodological intervention," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 839-858, September.
    16. Craig Standing & John Mingers & Susan Standing, 2018. "The Use of Social Media in Supporting the Development of Open Organizations for Innovation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 838-855, November.
    17. Junguang Zhang & Xiwei Song & Estrella Díaz, 2017. "Critical chain project buffer sizing based on resource constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 671-683, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junguang Zhang & Dan Wan, 2021. "Determination of early warning time window for bottleneck resource buffer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(1), pages 289-305, May.
    2. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Zhichang Zhu, 2022. "Paradigm, specialty, pragmatism: Kuhn's legacy to methodological pluralism," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 895-912, September.
    4. She, Bingling & Chen, Bo & Hall, Nicholas G., 2021. "Buffer sizing in critical chain project management by network decomposition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Xuejun Hu & Jianjiang Wang & Kaijun Leng, 2019. "The Interaction Between Critical Chain Sequencing, Buffer Sizing, and Reactive Actions in a CC/BM Framework," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(03), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Junguang Zhang & Xiwei Song & Estrella Díaz, 2017. "Critical chain project buffer sizing based on resource constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 671-683, February.
    7. Guofeng Ma & Jianyao Jia & Tiancheng Zhu & Shan Jiang, 2019. "A Critical Design Structure Method for Project Schedule Development under Rework Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    9. Xuejun Hu & Erik Demeulemeester & Nanfang Cui & Jianjiang Wang & Wendi Tian, 2017. "Improved critical chain buffer management framework considering resource costs and schedule stability," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 159-183, June.
    10. Yan Zhao & Nanfang Cui & Wendi Tian, 2020. "A two-stage approach for the critical chain project rescheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 67-95, February.
    11. Debadutta Kumar Panda, 2024. "An application of systems thinking to group‐based organisations," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 581-597, July.
    12. Mohammadreza Sharifi Ghazvini & Vahidreza Ghezavati & Sadigh Raissi & Ahmad Makui, 2017. "An Integrated Efficiency–Risk Approach in Sustainable Project Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi & Zwikael, Ofer, 2021. "Integrating risk into estimations of project activities' time and cost: A stratified approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 482-490.
    14. Graeme Nicholas, 2022. "Getting to practical: Complementarity between critical systems thinking and phronetic social science," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 913-922, September.
    15. Guofeng Ma & Shan Jiang & Tiancheng Zhu & Jianyao Jia, 2019. "A Novel Method of Developing Construction Projects Schedule under Rework Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-25, October.
    16. Michael C. Jackson, 2022. "Critical systems practice 3: Intervene—Flexibly executing a multimethodological intervention," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1014-1023, November.
    17. Rajneesh Chowdhury, 2023. "Systems thinking for creative and flexible practice," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 613-616, July.
    18. Michael C. Jackson, 2023. "Rebooting the systems approach by applying the thinking of Bogdanov and the pragmatists," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 349-365, March.
    19. Wendi Tian & Erik Demeulemeester, 2014. "Railway scheduling reduces the expected project makespan over roadrunner scheduling in a multi-mode project scheduling environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 271-291, February.
    20. Junguang Zhang & Xiwei Song & Hongyu Chen & Ruixia (Sandy) Shi, 2016. "Determination of critical chain project buffer based on information flow interactions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(9), pages 1146-1157, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:41:y:2024:i:2:p:247-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.