IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i23p6618-d290104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virtuality Changes Consumer Preference: The Effect of Transaction Virtuality as Psychological Distance on Consumer Purchase Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Do-Hyung Park

    (School of Management Information Systems, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Korea)

Abstract

With the rapid development of information and communication technology, a variety of new industries and services are rapidly evolving based on the convergence between existing Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and heterogeneous industries. In the meantime, the FinTech market, created by the convergence of financial and ICT areas, is emerging and growing rapidly. The new market of virtual transaction based on digital money is growing faster than any other FinTech area. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the perceived difference in the virtuality of a consumer’s transaction affects the consumer’s purchasing behavior and how the behavior changes. Specifically, this study revealed that consumers’ perceived virtuality differs according to the type of transaction method. Consumers felt that the money was more virtual when they had digital (virtual) currency for a service than when they had cash. This virtuality of money controls the psychological distance of the consumer’s money, which is closer to cash than virtual currency. This difference in psychological distance affects consumers’ information processing, such that when psychological distances are far (vs. close), consumers prefer products that are described as abstract (vs. concrete), and have a more favorable attitude toward products with more variety.

Suggested Citation

  • Do-Hyung Park, 2019. "Virtuality Changes Consumer Preference: The Effect of Transaction Virtuality as Psychological Distance on Consumer Purchase Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6618-:d:290104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6618/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6618/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moshe Givon, 1984. "Variety Seeking Through Brand Switching," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22.
    2. Qun Zhao & Pei-Hsuan Tsai & Jin-Long Wang, 2019. "Improving Financial Service Innovation Strategies for Enhancing China’s Banking Industry Competitive Advantage during the Fintech Revolution: A Hybrid MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Nidhi Agrawal & Echo Wen Wan, 2009. "Regulating Risk or Risking Regulation? Construal Levels and Depletion Effects in the Processing of Health Messages," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(3), pages 448-462.
    4. Rebecca W. Hamilton & Debora Viana Thompson, 2007. "Is There a Substitute for Direct Experience? Comparing Consumers' Preferences after Direct and Indirect Product Experiences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 546-555, June.
    5. McAlister, Leigh, 1982. "A Dynamic Attribute Satiation Model of Variety-Seeking Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 141-150, September.
    6. Peter H. Farquhar & Vithala R. Rao, 1976. "A Balance Model for Evaluating Subsets of Multiattributed Items," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 528-539, January.
    7. Ratner, Rebecca K & Kahn, Barbara E & Kahneman, Daniel, 1999. "Choosing Less-Preferred Experiences for the Sake of Variety," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Naeyoung Kang & Jungmu Kim, 2019. "An Empirical Analysis of Bitcoin Price Jump Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, April.
    9. Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1979. "Differences in Consumer Purchase Behavior by Credit Card Payment System," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 6(1), pages 58-66, June.
    10. Yong Jae Shin & Yongrok Choi, 2019. "Feasibility of the Fintech Industry as an Innovation Platform for Sustainable Economic Growth in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Debora Viana Thompson & Rebecca W. Hamilton & Petia K. Petrova, 2009. "When Mental Simulation Hinders Behavior: The Effects of Process-Oriented Thinking on Decision Difficulty and Performance," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(4), pages 562-574, December.
    12. Pradipta Kumar SAHOO, 2017. "Bitcoin as digital money: Its growth and future sustainability," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(4(613), W), pages 53-64, Winter.
    13. Yongrok Choi & Lili Sun, 2016. "Reuse Intention of Third-Party Online Payments: A Focus on the Sustainable Factors of Alipay," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Faison, Edmund W J, 1977. "The Neglected Variety Drive: A Useful Concept for Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(3), pages 172-175, December.
    15. Drazen Prelec & George Loewenstein, 1998. "The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 4-28.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Do-Hyung Park, 2021. "Consumer Adoption of Consumer-Created vs. Expert-Created Information: Moderating Role of Prior Product Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Junyoung Park & Do-Hyung Park, 2019. "A Sustainable Project Management Strategy against Multitasking Situations from the Viewpoints of Cognitive Mechanism and Motivational Belief," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Bong-Goon Seo & Do-Hyung Park, 2020. "Did You Invest Less Than Me? The Effect of Other’s Share of Investment on Psychological Ownership of Crowdfunding Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Do-Hyung Park & Sungwook Lee, 2021. "UGC Sharing Motives and Their Effects on UGC Sharing Intention from Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives: Focusing on Content Creators in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-13, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Zeithammer & Raphael Thomadsen, 2013. "Vertical Differentiation with Variety-Seeking Consumers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 390-401, August.
    2. P. B. Seetharaman & Hai Che, 2009. "Price Competition in Markets with Consumer Variety Seeking," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 516-525, 05-06.
    3. Liang Huang & Rafay A. Siddiqui & Anastasiya Pocheptsova Ghosh, 2024. "More of the same: Painful payment methods decrease variety seeking," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 533-545, December.
    4. Yizhao Jiang, 2022. "The Influence of Payment Method: Do Consumers Pay More with Mobile Payment?," Papers 2210.14631, arXiv.org.
    5. Ma, Qingguo & He, Yijin & Tan, Yulin & Cheng, Lu & Wang, Manlin, 2024. "Unveiling the Impact of Payment Methods on Consumer Behavior: Insights and Future Directions," OSF Preprints 3fphk, Center for Open Science.
    6. Mohan, Geetha & Sivakumaran, Bharadhwaj & Sharma, Piyush, 2012. "Store environment's impact on variety seeking behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 419-428.
    7. Zeballos, Eliana & Mancino, Lisa & Lin, Biing-Hwan, 2020. "Does how you pay influence the share of healthy items that you Buy? Assessing differences in nutritional quality of food purchases by payment type," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Wu, Pei-Hsun & Kao, Danny Tengti, 2011. "Goal orientation and variety seeking behavior: The role of decision task," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 65-72, February.
    9. Dilip Soman & Amar Cheema, 2002. "The Effect of Credit on Spending Decisions: The Role of the Credit Limit and Credibility," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 32-53, September.
    10. Haipeng (Allan) Chen & Akshay R. Rao, 2002. "Close Encounters of Two Kinds: False Alarms and Dashed Hopes," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 178-196, August.
    11. Falk, Tomas & Kunz, Werner H. & Schepers, Jeroen J.L. & Mrozek, Alexander J., 2016. "How mobile payment influences the overall store price image," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2417-2423.
    12. Xu, Xiaobing & Chen, Rong & Jiang, Lan, 2020. "The Influence of Payment Mechanisms on Pricing: When Mental Imagery Stimulates Desire for Money," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 178-188.
    13. Felipe Caro & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2012. "Product and Price Competition with Satiation Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(7), pages 1357-1373, July.
    14. Rose, Stefan & Wentzel, Daniel & Hopp, Christian & Kaminski, Jermain, 2020. "Launching for Success: The Effects of Psychological Distance and Mental Simulation on Funding Decisions and Crowdfunding Performance," SocArXiv fqbwk, Center for Open Science.
    15. Sergi Jiménez-Martín & Antonio Ladrón de Guevara-Martínez, 2009. "A state-dependent model of hybrid behavior with rational consumers in the attribute space," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 33(3), pages 347-383, September.
    16. Bernadette Kamleitner & Berna Erki, 2013. "Payment method and perceptions of ownership," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 57-69, March.
    17. Mazursky, David & Vinitzky, Gideon, 2005. "Modifying consumer search processes in enhanced on-line interfaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(10), pages 1299-1309, October.
    18. Yingying Zhang-Zhang & Sylvia Rohlfer & Jay Rajasekera, 2020. "An Eco-Systematic View of Cross-Sector Fintech: The Case of Alibaba and Tencent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Nanarpuzha, Rajesh, 2013. "Modeling Situational Factors in Variety Seeking Behaviour: An Extension of the Lightning Bolt Model," IIMA Working Papers WP2013-12-04, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    20. Liyang Xiong & Honglei Yu & Zhanqing Wang, 2021. "Competition in a Variety Seeking Market With Brand Name Awareness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6618-:d:290104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.