IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2134-d153913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Public Procurement Policies on Promoting Scientific and Technological Innovation in China: Comparisons with the U.S., the UK, Japan, Germany, France, and South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoli Wang

    (School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    School of Economics and Management, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 451191, China)

  • Yun Liu

    (School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yanbing Ju

    (School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

In many countries, sustainable public procurement is a powerful tool to reflect on national strategic intentions and promote scientific and technological innovation. Based on the perspective of an institutional structure, we filtered out the core policies. Using policy bibliometrics, we analyzed Chinese public procurement policies on promoting scientific and technological innovation, revealed policy-making characteristics, and concluded that the Ministry of Finance should appropriately decentralize the policy-making work to other relevant agencies of the State Council. This article compares the main policy tools from four dimensions in China, the U.S., the United Kingdom, Japan, Germany, France, and South Korea. We issued these pertinent strategies: establishing the vendor database for small and medium enterprises, developing a grade system and the post-evaluation system, formulating detailed implementation methods for high-tech products (services), and carrying out classification management for imported products. For sustainable public procurement policies on promoting scientific and technological innovation, this article provides an effective reference to organize the agencies and formulate the detail measures. This article’s research framework could be applied to analyze other industry policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoli Wang & Yun Liu & Yanbing Ju, 2018. "Sustainable Public Procurement Policies on Promoting Scientific and Technological Innovation in China: Comparisons with the U.S., the UK, Japan, Germany, France, and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2134-:d:153913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Atsushi Iimi, 2016. "Multidimensional Auctions for Public Energy Efficiency Projects: Evidence from Japanese Esco Market," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 49(3), pages 491-514, November.
    2. Shingal, Anirudh, 2011. "Services procurement under the WTO's Agreement on Government Procurement: whither market access?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 527-549, October.
    3. Hosoe, Nobuhiro & Takagi, Shingo, 2012. "Retail power market competition with endogenous entry decision—An auction data analysis," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 351-368.
    4. Max Rolfstam, 2009. "Public procurement as an innovation policy tool: The role of institutions," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(5), pages 349-360, June.
    5. Cappellaro, Giulia & Fattore, Giovanni & Torbica, Aleksandra, 2009. "Funding health technologies in decentralized systems: A comparison between Italy and Spain," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(2-3), pages 313-321, October.
    6. Gabjo Kim & Joonhyuck Lee & Dongsik Jang & Sangsung Park, 2016. "Technology Clusters Exploration for Patent Portfolio through Patent Abstract Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Guillermo Cardoza & Gaston Fornes & Ping Li & Ning Xu & Song Xu, 2015. "China goes global: public policies' influence on small- and medium-sized enterprises' international expansion," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 188-210, April.
    8. Viktor Slavtchev & Simon Wiederhold, 2016. "Does the Technological Content of Government Demand Matter for Private R&D? Evidence from US States," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 45-84, April.
    9. Amaral, Miguel & Saussier, Stéphane & Yvrande-Billon, Anne, 2009. "Auction procedures and competition in public services: The case of urban public transport in France and London," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 166-175, June.
    10. Guoqiang Zhang & Yanmei Xu & Juan Zhang, 2016. "Consumer-Oriented Policy towards Diffusion of Electric Vehicles: City-Level Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Vecchiato, Riccardo & Roveda, Claudio, 2014. "Foresight for public procurement and regional innovation policy: The case of Lombardy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 438-450.
    12. Veiko Lember & Rainer Kattel & Tarmo Kalvet, 2014. "How Governments Support Innovation Through Public Procurement: Comparing Evidence from 11 Countries," Springer Books, in: Veiko Lember & Rainer Kattel & Tarmo Kalvet (ed.), Public Procurement, Innovation and Policy, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 287-309, Springer.
    13. Neil M. Coe, 2000. "The Externalisation of Producer Services Debate: The UK Computer Services Sector," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 64-81, April.
    14. Anthony Flynn & Paul Davis, 2016. "The policy–practice divide and SME-friendly public procurement," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(3), pages 559-578, May.
    15. Dixon, Peter B. & Rimmer, Maureen T. & Waschik, Robert G., 2018. "Evaluating the effects of local content measures in a CGE model: Eliminating the US Buy America(n) programs," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 155-166.
    16. Zhuoyi Wen, 2017. "Government Purchase of Services in China: Similar Intentions, Different Policy Designs," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(1), pages 65-78, February.
    17. Shengguo Xu & Chunli Chu & Meiting Ju & Chaofeng Shao, 2016. "System Establishment and Method Application for Quantitatively Evaluating the Green Degree of the Products in Green Public Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-12, September.
    18. Denis, Alain & Mergaert, Lut & Fostier, Christel & Cleemput, Irina & Simoens, Steven, 2010. "A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(2-3), pages 173-179, October.
    19. Jolien Grandia, 2015. "The role of change agents in sustainable public procurement projects," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 119-126, March.
    20. Zheng-Xia He & Shi-Chun Xu & Qin-Bin Li & Bin Zhao, 2018. "Factors That Influence Renewable Energy Technological Innovation in China: A Dynamic Panel Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-30, January.
    21. Hattori, Toru, 2010. "Determinants of the number of bidders in the competitive procurement of electricity supply contracts in the Japanese public sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1299-1305, November.
    22. Rieko Ishii, 2014. "Bid Roundness Under Collusion in Japanese Procurement Auctions," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 44(3), pages 241-254, May.
    23. Kim Loader, 2013. "Is Public Procurement a Successful Small Business Support Policy? A Review of the Evidence," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(1), pages 39-55, February.
    24. Yanchao Li & Luke Georghiou, 2016. "Signaling and accrediting new technology: Use of procurement for innovation in China," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 338-351.
    25. J. Gordon Murray, 2014. "Debate: UK public procurement 2014," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 244-246, July.
    26. Xiuming Yu & Meijing Li & Kyung Ah Kim & Jimoon Chung & Keun Ho Ryu, 2016. "Emerging Pattern-Based Clustering of Web Users Utilizing a Simple Page-Linked Graph," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, March.
    27. Jane Grose & Maria Bennallick & Andrew Nichols & Sabine Pahl & Janet Richardson, 2012. "Facilitating Sustainable Waste Management Behaviors Within the Health Sector: A Case Study of the National Health Service (NHS) in Southwest England, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-13, April.
    28. Veiko Lember & Rainer Kattel & Tarmo Kalvet (ed.), 2014. "Public Procurement, Innovation and Policy," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-40258-6, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zezhou Wu & Qiufeng He & Kaijie Yang & Jinming Zhang & Kexi Xu, 2020. "Investigating the Dynamics of China’s Green Building Policy Development from 1986 to 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Jose Torres-Pruñonosa & Miquel Angel Plaza-Navas & Francisco Díez-Martín & Albert Beltran-Cangrós, 2021. "The Intellectual Structure of Social and Sustainable Public Procurement Research: A Co-Citation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-33, January.
    3. Ian Vázquez-Rowe & Cristina Córdova-Arias & Xavier Brioso & Sandra Santa-Cruz, 2021. "A Method to Include Life Cycle Assessment Results in Choosing by Advantage (CBA) Multicriteria Decision Analysis. A Case Study for Seismic Retrofit in Peruvian Primary Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Mingshun Zhang & Li Zhang & Meine Pieter van Dijk, 2022. "Managing Sustainable Public Procurement: A Nationwide Survey in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Li, Xin & Zhou, Xiaoxue & Yan, Ke, 2022. "Technological progress for sustainable development: An empirical analysis from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 146-155.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paula Cayolla Trindade & Paula Antunes & Paulo Partidário, 2017. "SPP Toolbox: Supporting Sustainable Public Procurement in the Context of Socio-Technical Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Serenella Caravella & Francesco Crespi, 2021. "The role of public procurement as innovation lever: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 663-684, October.
    3. Dai, Xiaoyong & Li, Yanchao & Chen, Kaihua, 2021. "Direct demand-pull and indirect certification effects of public procurement for innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Bento, Nuno & Sousa, Cristina & Trindade, Paula & Mamede, Ricardo Paes & Fontes, Margarida & Alves, Tiago, 2022. "Robust relation between public procurement for innovation and economic development," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. Shigeharu Okajima & Hiroko Okajima, 2016. "Impact of environmental regulation and the 2011 earthquake on the Japanese electricity industry," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 223-249, April.
    6. Obwegeser, Nikolaus & Müller, Sune Dueholm, 2018. "Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and applications," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 74, pages 1-17.
    7. Dongwook Kim & Sungbum Kim, 2017. "The Role of Mobile Technology in Tourism: Patents, Articles, News, and Mobile Tour App Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-45, November.
    8. Babica Viktorija & Sceulovs Deniss, 2019. "Public Procurement of Innovation: Selection of the Sustainable Alternative," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 233-246, January.
    9. Andrea Bentancor & Gustavo Crespi & Virginia Robano, 2019. "Public procurement as a driver of innovation and entrepreneurship," Documentos de Investigación 120, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales.
    10. Sergey Tsygankov & Vadim Syropyatov & Vyacheslav Volchik, 2021. "Institutional Governance of Innovations: Novel Insights of Leadership in Russian Public Procurement," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Rainville, Dr. Anne, 2021. "Stimulating a more Circular Economy through Public Procurement: Roles and dynamics of intermediation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    12. Bernard Hoekman & Marco Sanfilippo, 2020. "Foreign participation in public procurement and firm performance: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(1), pages 41-73, February.
    13. Chulok Alexander, 2021. "Applying blended foresight methods for revealing incentives and future strategies of key national innovation system players," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 160-173, December.
    14. Bongsuk Sung & Myoung Shik Choi & Woo-Yong Song, 2019. "Exploring the Effects of Government Policies on Economic Performance: Evidence Using Panel Data for Korean Renewable Energy Technology Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Zeeshan Noor Siddiqui, 2017. "Understanding the Linkage among Public Procurement (PP), Corruption, and Tax Morale (TM) Through Agency Theory (AT): A Review," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(3), pages 258-288, September.
    16. Ghisetti, Claudia, 2017. "Demand-pull and environmental innovations: Estimating the effects of innovative public procurement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 178-187.
    17. Matteo Migheli, 2017. "The winner’s curse in auctions with losses," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 16(1), pages 113-126, November.
    18. Krieger, Bastian & Zipperer, Vera, 2022. "Does green public procurement trigger environmental innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    19. Zheng, Mingbo & Feng, Gen-Fu & Feng, Suling & Yuan, Xuemei, 2019. "The road to innovation vs. the role of globalization: A dynamic quantile investigation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 65-83.
    20. Mustafa Can, 2015. "Public Procurement of Innovation: Proposal of a New Model," EY International Congress on Economics II (EYC2015), November 5-6, 2015, Ankara, Turkey 217, Ekonomik Yaklasim Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2134-:d:153913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.