IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p11955-d921815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Sustainable Public Procurement: A Nationwide Survey in China

Author

Listed:
  • Mingshun Zhang

    (Beijing Climate Change Response Research and Education Centre, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (BUCEA), No. 1, Zhanlanguan Road, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Li Zhang

    (Beijing Climate Change Response Research and Education Centre, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (BUCEA), No. 1, Zhanlanguan Road, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Meine Pieter van Dijk

    (BUCEA and Maastricht School of Management (MSM), Endepolsdomein 150, 6229 EP Maastricht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Sustainable public procurement (SPP) is an important element of China’s public policy and a market instrument to achieve sustainable development. This research aims at achieving insights into China’s SPP through a nationwide survey of Public Procurement Centers (PPCs), telephone interviews, and an expert workshop. The results show that China’s SPP is a hierarchical and centralized multi-level system, which is characterized by a top-down structure and is mainly driven by legal and policy initiatives, social benefits, and commitments of public bodies. There is huge potential for more SPP that remains untapped in China, and barriers are observed at the SPP operational level. The main barriers include a lack of trust in sustainability information about different products, limitations of the two SPP lists used, a lack of knowledge and skills, the perception of higher prices in the case of SPP, a lack of transparency, a lack of user-friendly tools, and soft social–environmental criteria that have low operability in the local situation. This research recommends a reform of SPP, moving from applying technical and functional specifications from the existing two-list approach to involving state-owned enterprises and infrastructure projects in a different SPP approach. Theoretical conclusions concern the Chinese SPP practice. In China, SPP is more like social responsible public procurement. Secondly, it was found that there are advantages to a more decentralized system, and finally, the implementation of SPP is declining because of specific barriers identified in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingshun Zhang & Li Zhang & Meine Pieter van Dijk, 2022. "Managing Sustainable Public Procurement: A Nationwide Survey in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11955-:d:921815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11955/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11955/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramon Bernal & Leire San-Jose & Jose Luis Retolaza, 2019. "Improvement Actions for a More Social and Sustainable Public Procurement: A Delphi Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Sarkis, Joseph & Dhavale, Dileep G., 2015. "Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 177-191.
    3. Testa, Francesco & Iraldo, Fabio & Frey, Marco & Daddi, Tiberio, 2012. "What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 88-96.
    4. Xiaoli Wang & Yun Liu & Yanbing Ju, 2018. "Sustainable Public Procurement Policies on Promoting Scientific and Technological Innovation in China: Comparisons with the U.S., the UK, Japan, Germany, France, and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Adnan Khan & Meng Tao & Hassan Ahmad & Muhammad Nouman Shafique & Muhammad Zahid Nawaz, 2020. "Revisiting Green Supply Chain Management Practices: The Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, March.
    6. Jianguo Wang & Jianming Wang & Jian Gao, 2020. "Effect of Green Consumption Value on Consumption Intention in a Pro-Environmental Setting: The Mediating Role of Approach and Avoidance Motivation," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    7. Yanlin Ma & Yuting Liu & Andrea Appolloni & Junqi Liu, 2021. "Does green public procurement encourage firm's environmental certification practice? The mediation role of top management support," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1002-1017, May.
    8. Yao Song & Zhenzhen Qin & Zihao Qin, 2020. "Green Marketing to Gen Z Consumers in China: Examining the Mediating Factors of an Eco-Label–Informed Purchase," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    9. Georghiou, Luke & Edler, Jakob & Uyarra, Elvira & Yeow, Jillian, 2014. "Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-12.
    10. J. Gordon Murray, 2014. "Debate: UK public procurement 2014," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 244-246, July.
    11. Ilknur Ayar & Ahmet Gürbüz, 2021. "Sustainable Consumption Intentions of Consumers in Turkey: A Research Within the Theory of Planned Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jose Torres-Pruñonosa & Miquel Angel Plaza-Navas & Francisco Díez-Martín & Albert Beltran-Cangrós, 2021. "The Intellectual Structure of Social and Sustainable Public Procurement Research: A Co-Citation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-33, January.
    2. Anne Rainville, 2022. "Green Public Procurement in Mission-Orientated Innovation Systems: Leveraging Voluntary Standards to Improve Sustainability Performance of Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Jolien Grandia & Dylan Voncken, 2019. "Sustainable Public Procurement: The Impact of Ability, Motivation, and Opportunity on the Implementation of Different Types of Sustainable Public Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Javier Mendoza Jiménez & Montserrat Hernández López & Susana Eva Franco Escobar, 2019. "Sustainable Public Procurement: From Law to Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Paula Cayolla Trindade & Paula Antunes & Paulo Partidário, 2017. "SPP Toolbox: Supporting Sustainable Public Procurement in the Context of Socio-Technical Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Diego Badell & Jordi Rosell, 2021. "Are EU Institutions Still Green Actors? An Empirical Study of Green Public Procurement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1555-1572, November.
    7. Peter Džupka & Matúš Kubák & Peter Nemec, 2020. "Sustainable Public Procurement in Central European Countries. Can It Also Bring Savings?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Brusselaers, Jan & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido & Buysse, Jeroen, 2017. "Green Public Procurement of Certified Wood: Spatial Leverage Effect and Welfare Implications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 91-102.
    9. Sofia Lingegård & Johanna Alkan Olsson & Anna Kadefors & Stefan Uppenberg, 2021. "Sustainable Public Procurement in Large Infrastructure Projects—Policy Implementation for Carbon Emission Reductions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Maria Björklund & Helena Forslund, 2019. "Challenges Addressed by Swedish Third-Party Logistics Providers Conducting Sustainable Logistics Business Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Liotard, Isabelle & Revest, Valérie, 2018. "Contests as innovation policy instruments: Lessons from the US federal agencies' experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 57-69.
    12. Chunling Yu & Toru Morotomi & Haiping Yu, 2020. "What Influences Adoption of Green Award Criteria in a Public Contract? An Empirical Analysis of 2018 European Public Procurement Contract Award Notices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Davis-Sramek, Beth & Robinson, Jessica L. & Darby, Jessica L. & Thomas, Rodney W., 2020. "Exploring the differential roles of environmental and social sustainability in carrier selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    14. Jeongae You & Woosuk Kim & Hyun-Suk Lee & Minjung Kwon, 2021. "Best Content Standards in Sports Career Education for Adolescents: A Delphi Survey of Korean Professional Views," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    15. Ghisetti, Claudia, 2017. "Demand-pull and environmental innovations: Estimating the effects of innovative public procurement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 178-187.
    16. Surajit Bag & Shivam Gupta, 2017. "Antecedents of Sustainable Innovation in Supplier Networks: A South African Experience," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(3), pages 231-250, September.
    17. Ionela Corina Chersan & Valentin Florentin Dumitru & Cãtãlina Gorgan & Vasile Gorgan, 2020. "Green Public Procurement in the Academic Literature," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 1-82, February.
    18. Lin, Edward M.H. & Sun, Edward W. & Yu, Min-Teh, 2020. "Behavioral data-driven analysis with Bayesian method for risk management of financial services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    19. Krieger, Bastian & Zipperer, Vera, 2022. "Does green public procurement trigger environmental innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    20. Frank Goedertier & Bert Weijters & Joeri Van den Bergh, 2024. "Are Consumers Equally Willing to Pay More for Brands That Aim for Sustainability, Positive Societal Contribution, and Inclusivity as for Brands That Are Perceived as Exclusive? Generational, Gender, a," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11955-:d:921815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.