IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i9p941-d78204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

System Establishment and Method Application for Quantitatively Evaluating the Green Degree of the Products in Green Public Procurement

Author

Listed:
  • Shengguo Xu

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

  • Chunli Chu

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

  • Meiting Ju

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

  • Chaofeng Shao

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

Abstract

The government green purchase is widely considered to be an effective means of promoting sustainable consumption. However, how to identify the greener product is the biggest obstacle of government green purchase and it has not been well solved. A quantitative evaluation method is provided to measure the green degree of different products of the same use function with an indicator system established, which includes fundamental indicators, general indicators, and leading indicators. It can clearly show the products’ green extent by rating the scores of different products, which provides the government a tool to compare the green degree of different products and select greener ones. A comprehensive evaluation case of a project purchasing 1635 desk computers in Tianjin government procurement center is conducted using the green degree evaluation system. The environmental performance of the products were assessed quantitatively, and the evaluation price, which was the bid price minus the discount (the discount rate was according to the total scores attained by their environmental performance), and the final evaluation price ranking from low to high in turn is supplier C, D, E, A, and B. The winner, supplier C, was not the lowest bid price or the best environmental performance, but it performed well at both bid price and environmental performance so it deserved the project. It shows that the green extent evaluation system can help classify the different products by evaluating their environment performance including structure and connection technology, selection of materials and marks, prolonged use, hazardous substances, energy consumption, recyclability rate, etc. and price, so that it could help to choose the greener products.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengguo Xu & Chunli Chu & Meiting Ju & Chaofeng Shao, 2016. "System Establishment and Method Application for Quantitatively Evaluating the Green Degree of the Products in Green Public Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:941-:d:78204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/9/941/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/9/941/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nissinen, A. & Parikka-Alhola, K. & Rita, H., 2009. "Environmental criteria in the public purchases above the EU threshold values by three Nordic countries: 2003 and 2005," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1838-1849, April.
    2. Shahin Mokhlesian, 2014. "How Do Contractors Select Suppliers for Greener Construction Projects? The Case of Three Swedish Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Simcoe, Timothy & Toffel, Michael W., 2014. "Government green procurement spillovers: Evidence from municipal building policies in California," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 411-434.
    4. Linda W.P. Ho & Nicholas M. Dickinson & Gilbert Y.S. Chan, 2010. "Green procurement in the Asian public sector and the Hong Kong private sector," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(1), pages 24-38, February.
    5. Helen Walker & Wendy Phillips, 2009. "Sustainable procurement: emerging issues," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 41-61.
    6. Rylie E.O. Pelton & Timothy M. Smith, 2015. "Hotspot Scenario Analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(3), pages 427-440, June.
    7. Tarantini, Mario & Loprieno, Arianna Dominici & Porta, Pier Luigi, 2011. "A life cycle approach to Green Public Procurement of building materials and elements: A case study on windows," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2473-2482.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Zhaowen & Jiang, Yaohui, 2022. "Can green public procurement change energy efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Jose Luis Fuentes-Bargues & Pablo Sebastian Ferrer-Gisbert & Mª. Carmen González-Cruz, 2018. "Analysis of Green Public Procurement of Works by Spanish Public Universities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Jose Torres-Pruñonosa & Miquel Angel Plaza-Navas & Francisco Díez-Martín & Albert Beltran-Cangrós, 2021. "The Intellectual Structure of Social and Sustainable Public Procurement Research: A Co-Citation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-33, January.
    4. Takuro Miyamoto & Naonari Yajima & Takahiro Tsukahara & Toshi H. Arimura, 2020. "Advancement of Green Public Purchasing by Category: Do Municipality Green Purchasing Policies Have Any Role in Japan?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Gabriel Brătucu & Adrian Trifan & Lavinia Dovleac & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Raluca Dania Todor & Rareș Brătucu, 2019. "Acquisition of Electric Vehicles—A Step towards Green Consumption. Empirical Research among Romanian Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Xiaoli Wang & Yun Liu & Yanbing Ju, 2018. "Sustainable Public Procurement Policies on Promoting Scientific and Technological Innovation in China: Comparisons with the U.S., the UK, Japan, Germany, France, and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, June.
    7. Chia-Nan Wang & Ming-Hsun Lin & Chung-Jen Huang & Ching-Chiu Huang & Ruei-Yuan Liao, 2017. "Using TRIZ to Improve the Procurement Process of Spare Parts in the Taiwan Navy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-12, October.
    8. Ionel Bostan & Cristina Mihaela Lazar & Nicoleta Asalos, 2020. "Legislative Means Aimed at Stimulating Green Procurement in the Public Sector. A Critical Case Study of Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 221-221, February.
    9. Ziyuan Tian & Xixiang Sun & Jianguo Wang & Weihuan Su & Gen Li, 2022. "Factors Affecting Green Purchase Intention: A Perspective of Ethical Decision Making," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Yanlin Ma & Yuting Liu & Andrea Appolloni & Junqi Liu, 2021. "Does green public procurement encourage firm's environmental certification practice? The mediation role of top management support," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1002-1017, May.
    11. TomáÅ¡ Malatinec, 2019. "Attitudes Of Europeans Towards Green Products," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 99-106.
    12. Jose Luis Fuentes-Bargues & Pablo Sebastian Ferrer-Gisbert & Mª Carmen González-Cruz & María Jose Bastante-Ceca, 2019. "Green Public Procurement at a Regional Level. Case Study: The Valencia Region of Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jose Luis Fuentes-Bargues & Pablo Sebastian Ferrer-Gisbert & Mª Carmen González-Cruz & María Jose Bastante-Ceca, 2019. "Green Public Procurement at a Regional Level. Case Study: The Valencia Region of Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Ionela Corina Chersan & Valentin Florentin Dumitru & Cãtãlina Gorgan & Vasile Gorgan, 2020. "Green Public Procurement in the Academic Literature," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 1-82, February.
    3. Zaidi, Syed Anees Haider & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hou, Fujun & Abbas, Qaisar, 2021. "Sustainability challenges in public health sector procurement: An application of interpretative structural modelling," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Ana R. Leal & David Perez-Castillo & José Ernesto Amorós & Bryan W. Husted, 2020. "Municipal Green Purchasing in Mexico: Policy Adoption and Implementation Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Fabio Iannone & Francesco Testa & Tiberio Daddi & Marco Frey & Giulia Casamento, 2019. "The role of Green Public Procurement in Circular Economy policies: An international comparison," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 149-170.
    6. Yanlin Ma & Yuting Liu & Andrea Appolloni & Junqi Liu, 2021. "Does green public procurement encourage firm's environmental certification practice? The mediation role of top management support," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1002-1017, May.
    7. José Luis Fuentes-Bargues & Mª Carmen González-Cruz & Cristina González-Gaya, 2017. "Environmental Criteria in the Spanish Public Works Procurement Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Costache, Mioara & Sebastian Cristea, Dragos & Petrea, Stefan-Mihai & Neculita, Mihaela & Rahoveanu, Maria Magdalena Turek & Simionov, Ira-Adeline & Mogodan, Alina & Sarpe, Daniela & Rahoveanu, Adrian, 2021. "Integrating aquaponics production systems into the Romanian green procurement network," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Katriina Alhola & Sven‐ Olof Ryding & Hanna Salmenperä & Niels Juul Busch, 2019. "Exploiting the Potential of Public Procurement: Opportunities for Circular Economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 96-109, February.
    10. Drogeanu Razvan & Magean Razvan & Petrea Stefan-Mihai & Cristea Dragos & Neculita Mihaela, 2021. "Perspectives of Including Aquaponics in Environmentally Preferable Procurement (EPP) Process for Supporting Green Economy," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 475-484.
    11. Testa, Francesco & Iraldo, Fabio & Frey, Marco & Daddi, Tiberio, 2012. "What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 88-96.
    12. Md. Mazharul Islam & Abalala Turki & Md. Wahid Murad & Azharul Karim, 2017. "Do Sustainable Procurement Practices Improve Organizational Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-17, December.
    13. José Luis Fuentes-Bargues & Mª José Bastante-Ceca & Pablo Sebastián Ferrer-Gisbert & Mª Carmen González-Cruz, 2020. "Analysis of the Situation of Social Public Procurement of Works at the Valencian Region (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Pelša Inese, 2019. "Green Public Procurement: Case Study of Latvian Municipalities," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 207-221, January.
    15. Kube, Roland & von Graevenitz, Kathrine & Löschel, Andreas & Massier, Philipp, 2019. "Do voluntary environmental programs reduce emissions? EMAS in the German manufacturing sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(S1).
    16. Per Engelseth & Richard Glavee-Geo & Artur Janusz & Enoch Niboi, 2020. "The Emergent Nature of Networked Sustainable Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Suzanne Benn & Damien Giurco & Paul James Brown & Renu Agarwal, 2014. "Towards Responsible Steel: Preliminary Insights," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Krieger, Bastian & Zipperer, Vera, 2022. "Does green public procurement trigger environmental innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    19. Anne Rainville, 2022. "Green Public Procurement in Mission-Orientated Innovation Systems: Leveraging Voluntary Standards to Improve Sustainability Performance of Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Jolien Grandia & Dylan Voncken, 2019. "Sustainable Public Procurement: The Impact of Ability, Motivation, and Opportunity on the Implementation of Different Types of Sustainable Public Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:941-:d:78204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.