IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v49y2012i1p169-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons from the Volunteering Legacy of the 2002 Commonwealth Games

Author

Listed:
  • Geoff Nichols
  • Rita Ralston

Abstract

Potential exists for a more multifaceted and interrelated volunteering legacy from mega sporting events than has been recognised by previous research, including not only the continuation and development of volunteering activity, but also the contribution that activity makes to the social inclusion of volunteers, the economic contribution to the development of events in the region, the development of a skilled volunteer workforce and raising the standard of event volunteer management. This paper provides evidence for that claim via a case study of Manchester Event Volunteers—a volunteer development organisation established after the 2002 Commonwealth Games, which is still operating seven years later and provides a role model for volunteer broker organisations. The case study shows that local government played a key role in generating a volunteer legacy, but that legacy planning was limited by the imperative of running the event. Implications for similar events, such as the 2012 Olympics, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoff Nichols & Rita Ralston, 2012. "Lessons from the Volunteering Legacy of the 2002 Commonwealth Games," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(1), pages 169-184, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:49:y:2012:i:1:p:169-184
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098010397400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098010397400
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098010397400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giles Atkinson & Susana Mourato & Stefan Szymanski & Ece Ozdemiroglu, 2008. "Are We Willing to Pay Enough to `Back the Bid'?: Valuing the Intangible Impacts of London's Bid to Host the 2012 Summer Olympic Games," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(2), pages 419-444, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niki Koutrou & Athanasios (Sakis) Pappous & Anna Johnson, 2016. "Post-Event Volunteering Legacy: Did the London 2012 Games Induce a Sustainable Volunteer Engagement?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Meehee Cho & Mark A. Bonn & Su Jin Han, 2018. "Generation Z’s Sustainable Volunteering: Motivations, Attitudes and Job Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pasquale Lucio Scandizzo & Maria Rita Pierleoni, 2018. "Assessing The Olympic Games: The Economic Impact And Beyond," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 649-682, July.
    2. Gulijiazi Yeerkenbieke & Chunci Chen & Guizhen He, 2021. "Public Perceived Effects of 2022 Winter Olympics on Host City Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Peter A. Groothuis & Kurt W. Rotthoff, 2016. "The Economic Impact and Civic Pride Effects of Sports Teams and Mega-Events: Do The Public and the Professionals Agree?," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 21-32, February.
    4. M.R. van den Berg & M. de Nooij, 2013. "The bidding paradox: why economists, consultants and politicians disagree on the economic effects of mega sports events but might agree on their attractiveness," Working Papers 13-08, Utrecht School of Economics.
    5. Brad R. Humphreys & Bruce K. Johnson & Daniel S. Mason & John C. Whitehead, 2011. "Estimating the Value of Medal Success at the 2010 Winter Olympic Games," Working Papers 11-20, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    6. Rotimi Joseph & David Proverbs & Jessica Lamond, 2015. "Assessing the value of intangible benefits of property level flood risk adaptation (PLFRA) measures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(2), pages 1275-1297, November.
    7. Dolan, Paul & Kavetsos, Georgios & Krekel, Christian & Mavridis, Dimitris & Metcalfe, Robert & Senik, Claudia & Szymanski, Stefan & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2019. "Quantifying the intangible impact of the Olympics using subjective well-being data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Bruce K. Johnson & John C. Whitehead & Daniel S. Mason & Gordon J. Walker, 2012. "Willingness to Pay for Downtown Public Goods Generated by Large, Sports-Anchored Development Projects: The CVM Approach," Working Papers 12-01, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    9. Brad R. Humphreys & Bruce K. Johnson & John C. Whitehead, 2020. "Validity and reliability of contingent valuation and life satisfaction measures of welfare: An application to the value of national Olympic success," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 87(1), pages 316-330, July.
    10. Tobias Streicher & Sascha L. Schmidt & Dominik Schreyer, 2019. "Referenda on Hosting the Olympics: What Drives Voter Turnout?," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 20(5), pages 627-653, June.
    11. Wicker, Pamela & Prinz, Joachim & von Hanau, Tassilo, 2012. "Estimating the value of national sporting success," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 200-210.
    12. de Boer, Willem I.J. & Koning, Ruud H. & Mierau, Jochen O., 2017. "Ex-ante and ex-post willingness-to-pay for hosting a major cycling event," Research Report 17013-EEF, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    13. Dorota Janiszewska & Vilde Hannevik Lien & Dariusz Kloskowski & Luiza Ossowska & Christian Dragin-Jensen & Marianna Strzelecka & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski, 2021. "Effects of COVID-19 Infection Control Measures on the Festival and Event Sector in Poland and Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Philip K. Porter & Daniel M. Chin, 2012. "Economic Impact of Sports Events," Chapters, in: Wolfgang Maennig & Andrew Zimbalist (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Mega Sporting Events, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Kasimati, Evangelia & Dawson, Peter, 2009. "Assessing the impact of the 2004 Olympic Games on the Greek economy: A small macroeconometric model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 139-146, January.
    16. Robert Baumann & Victor Matheson & Chihiro Muroi, 2008. "Bowling in Hawaii: Examining the Effectiveness of Sports-Based Tourism Strategies," Working Papers 0808, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.
    17. Aygul Ozbafli & Glenn P. Jenkins, 2015. "The Willingness To Pay By Households For Improved Reliability Of Electricity Service," Development Discussion Papers 2015-02, JDI Executive Programs.
    18. Robert A. Baade & Victor A. Matheson, 2016. "Going for the Gold: The Economics of the Olympics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 201-218, Spring.
    19. Peter Dawson & Paul Downward & Terence C. Mills, 2014. "Olympic news and attitudes towards the Olympics: a compositional time-series analysis of how sentiment is affected by events," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 1307-1314, June.
    20. M. Flegl & L. A. Andrade, 2018. "Measuring countries’ performance at the Summer Olympic Games in Rio 2016," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(3), pages 823-846, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:49:y:2012:i:1:p:169-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.