IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4752-d190188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academics’ Perceptions on Quality in Higher Education Shaping Key Performance Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanouil Varouchas

    (School of Business and Economics, Department of Computer Information Systems, The American College of Greece—Deree, Ag. Paraskevi Campus, Athens GR-153 42, Greece)

  • Miguel-Ángel Sicilia

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Alcalá, 28801-Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain)

  • Salvador Sánchez-Alonso

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Alcalá, 28801-Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Institutions in higher education (HE) continuously strive to develop and deliver impactful educational programs. At the same time, they should continue to fulfill their mission to educate students in basic applied subjects and in parallel respond to the need to equip students with new skills. For this reason, higher education institutions (HEI) perform periodical curricular reviews adhering to internal and external quality assurance systems. The subsequent curricular reforms are of a transformative nature, preparing graduates to tackle the challenges of globalization, unemployment and vanishing professions. For these reforms to lead to sustainable curricula, the integration of quality into educational programs is instrumental. A suggested way of achieving a transformative stance is to provide the context for the application and diffusion of quality metrics in teaching and learning. This research intends to provide a discussion of key performance indicators (KPIs) related to quality. This paper presents the second round of qualitative interviews with higher education administrators and professors as a promising vehicle for advancing towards the formulation of KPIs based on their understanding of the different independent dimensions of the quality construct. These KPIs will provide valuable insights into improving teaching, learning and assessment and will eventually lead to sustainable curricula. Research findings outline the significance of the time invested to design and update a course, indicate that technology-enhanced learning solutions are perceived as key quality drivers, and point out the need to align courses with industry requirements and real-world problems. Additionally, findings indicate that the quality and impact of teaching and learning is promoted by the multi/inter-disciplinary character of a course, the engagement of students in interactive discussions and student research as part of summative assessment. The main contribution of this research is an analytic discussion of perceptions of higher education administrators and professors about quality, leading to a significant enrichment of the relevant literature. A set of innovative generic KPIs which can be used in multidimensional quality assessment in higher education is eventually proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanouil Varouchas & Miguel-Ángel Sicilia & Salvador Sánchez-Alonso, 2018. "Academics’ Perceptions on Quality in Higher Education Shaping Key Performance Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4752-:d:190188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4752/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4752/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masaru Yarime & Yuko Tanaka, 2012. "The Issues and Methodologies in Sustainability Assessment Tools for Higher Education Institutions," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 6(1), pages 63-77, March.
    2. Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Awan & Muhammad Khan & Niaz Ahmad, 2013. "A model for total quality management in higher education," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1883-1904, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shivan Khudhur Ridha & Hanife Bensen Bostanci & Mustafa Kurt, 2022. "Using Animated Videos to Enhance Vocabulary Learning at the Noble Private Technical Institute (NPTI) in Northern Iraq/Erbil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Yi-Chen Lai & Li-Hsun Peng, 2019. "Effective Teaching and Activities of Excellent Teachers for the Sustainable Development of Higher Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Karina Cecilia Arredondo-Soto & Jean Paul Serrano-Manrrique & Julio Blanco-Fernandez & Guadalupe Hernández-Escobedo & Marco Augusto Miranda-Ackerman & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz, 2020. "Modeling of the Factors of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) Influencing the Strategic Linking Decisions with the Industrial Sector: Whole-Institution Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Abdulrahman Housawi & Amal Al Amoudi & Basim Alsaywid & Miltiadis Lytras & Yara H. bin Μoreba & Wesam Abuznadah & Sami A. Alhaidar, 2020. "Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Sustainable Postgraduate Medical Training: An Opportunity for Implementing an Innovative Approach to Advance the Quality of Training Programs at the," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-37, September.
    5. Mochamad Arief Budihardjo & Bimastyaji Surya Ramadan & Soraya Annisa Putri & Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum & Fadel Iqbal Muhammad, 2021. "Towards Sustainability in Higher-Education Institutions: Analysis of Contributing Factors and Appropriate Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Ciprian Cristea & Maria Cristea, 2021. "KPIs for Operational Performance Assessment in Flexible Packaging Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Rubia Cobo-Rendon & Karla Lobos Peña & Javier Mella-Norambuena & Nataly Cisternas San Martin & Fernando Peña, 2021. "Longitudinal Analysis of Teacher Technology Acceptance and Its Relationship to Resource Viewing and Academic Performance of College Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Elli Doukanari & Despo Ktoridou & Leonidas Efthymiou & Epaminondas Epaminonda, 2021. "The Quest for Sustainable Teaching Praxis: Opportunities and Challenges of Multidisciplinary and Multicultural Teamwork," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Gülsüm Aşıksoy, 2019. "Computer-Based Concept Mapping as a Method for Enhancing the Effectiveness of Concept Learning in Technology-Enhanced Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Qi-Zhen Zhang & Shan Jiang & Ran Liu & Hu-Chen Liu, 2020. "An Integrated Decision-Making Model for Analyzing Key Performance Indicators in University Performance Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdulrahman Housawi & Amal Al Amoudi & Basim Alsaywid & Miltiadis Lytras & Yara H. bin Μoreba & Wesam Abuznadah & Sami A. Alhaidar, 2020. "Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Sustainable Postgraduate Medical Training: An Opportunity for Implementing an Innovative Approach to Advance the Quality of Training Programs at the," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-37, September.
    2. Shivangi Dhawan, 2022. "Higher Education Quality and Student Satisfaction: Meta-Analysis, Subgroup Analysis and Meta-Regression," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 21(1), pages 48-66, June.
    3. Anirban Chakraborty & Sumit Kumar & L. S. Shashidhara & Anjali Taneja, 2021. "Building Sustainable Societies through Purpose-Driven Universities: A Case Study from Ashoka University (India)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Aurélien Décamps & Oihab Allal-Chérif & Anne Gombault, 2021. "Fostering Knowledge of the Sustainable Development Goals in Universities: The Case of Sulitest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Milenkovska, Violeta & Novkovska, Blagica, 2018. "How To Establish Uniform Higher Education Quality Management System For Macedonia," UTMS Journal of Economics, University of Tourism and Management, Skopje, Macedonia, vol. 9(2), pages 213-220.
    6. Lauri Lidstone & Tarah Wright & Kate Sherren, 2015. "An analysis of Canadian STARS-rated higher education sustainability policies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 259-278, April.
    7. Sandra Caeiro & Leyla Angélica Sandoval Hamón & Rute Martins & Cecilia Elizabeth Bayas Aldaz, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment and Benchmarking in Higher Education Institutions—A Critical Reflection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    8. Mahour Mellat Parast & Arsalan Safari, 2023. "Do quality and business excellence models improve quality and operational results in educational organizations? A repeated cross-sectional analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 868-886, June.
    9. Sebastian Niedlich & Mara Bauer & Margarita Doneliene & Larissa Jaeger & Marco Rieckmann & Inka Bormann, 2020. "Assessment of Sustainability Governance in Higher Education Institutions—A Systemic Tool Using a Governance Equalizer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Yusuf A. Adenle & Edwin H. W. Chan & Yi Sun & C.K. Chau, 2020. "Modifiable Campus-Wide Appraisal Model (MOCAM) for Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Jinyuan Guo & Zhixia Chen & Binyao Zheng, 2021. "Postgraduate Competence and Academic Research Performance: The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Libena Tetrevova & Jan Vavra & Simona Munzarova, 2021. "Communication of Socially-Responsible Activities by Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Ken Oyama & Ayari G. Pasquier & Edgar Mojica, 2018. "Transition to Sustainability in Macro-Universities: The Experience of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Katerina Tzafilkou & Liliana Mâță & Gabriela Livia Curpănaru & Ionuț Viorel Stoica & Lucian Nicolae Voinea & Constantin Șufaru, 2022. "A Comprehensive Instrument to Measure Teachers’ Attitude towards Quality Management in the Context of Online Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Elizabeth Davey, 2017. "Recapturing the learning opportunities of university sustainability indicators," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 540-549, December.
    16. Arif Jamal Habib Gokak & Smita Mehendale & Sanjay M. Bhāle, 2023. "Modelling and analysis for higher education shadow institutions in Indian context: an ISM approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3425-3451, August.
    17. William Horan & Bernadette O’Regan, 2021. "Developing a Practical Framework of Sustainability Indicators Relevant to All Higher Education Institutions to Enable Meaningful International Rankings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Sajjad Baig & Muhammad Abrar & Asif Ali & Mudassar Ahmad, 2015. "Implementation of TQM on higher education in Pakistan (short communication)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 51-56, January.
    19. Yawei Du & Monique H. Arkesteijn & Alexandra C. den Heijer & Kun Song, 2020. "Sustainable Assessment Tools for Higher Education Institutions: Guidelines for Developing a Tool for China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-30, August.
    20. Florian Findler & Norma Schönherr & Rodrigo Lozano & Barbara Stacherl, 2018. "Assessing the Impacts of Higher Education Institutions on Sustainable Development—An Analysis of Tools and Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4752-:d:190188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.