IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3498-d521658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

KPIs for Operational Performance Assessment in Flexible Packaging Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ciprian Cristea

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400027 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Maria Cristea

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400027 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

The flexible packaging industry has registered a significant growth over the last years, especially due to rising demand from healthcare, automotive, construction, food, beverage, and retail industries. It is essential for the production plants to regularly assess their ability to achieve performance target objectives and, at the same time, to compare their performance with that of factories from the same industry. By combining qualitative and quantitative research, this study proposes a set of thirty-two key performance indicators (KPIs), grouped into six activity areas, believed to be adequate to the flexible packaging industry, for assessing the operational performance. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method was employed to obtain the weights of the KPIs and to select the best manufacturing facility from a leading flexible packaging company in line with the opinions of experts that activate in this field. The results indicated that the main aspects considered by experts for assessing manufacturing plants operational performance were financial issues followed by production, customers contentment, quality, employee satisfaction and environmental protection. The proposed practical framework for assessing the operational performance along with the detailed information obtained in the paper are expected to represent important benchmarks for stakeholders involved in the decision-making process for flexible packaging industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Ciprian Cristea & Maria Cristea, 2021. "KPIs for Operational Performance Assessment in Flexible Packaging Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3498-:d:521658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3498/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3498/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emmanouil Varouchas & Miguel-Ángel Sicilia & Salvador Sánchez-Alonso, 2018. "Academics’ Perceptions on Quality in Higher Education Shaping Key Performance Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Eshtaiwi, Mohamed & Badi, Ibrahim & Abdulshahed, Ali & Erkan, Turan Erman, 2018. "Determination of key performance indicators for measuring airport success: A case study in Libya," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 28-34.
    3. Hannah Santos & Gustavo Lannelongue & Javier Gonzalez-Benito, 2019. "Integrating Green Practices into Operational Performance: Evidence from Brazilian Manufacturers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Melissa Demartini & Claudia Pinna & Bahar Aliakbarian & Flavio Tonelli & Sergio Terzi, 2018. "Soft Drink Supply Chain Sustainability: A Case Based Approach to Identify and Explain Best Practices and Key Performance Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Jui-Te Chiang & Chei-Chang Chiou & Shuh-Chyi Doong & I-Fang Chang, 2020. "Research on the Construction of Performance Indicators for the Marketing Alliance of Catering Industry and Credit Card Issuing Banks by Using the Balanced Scorecard and Fuzzy AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Baltazar, Maria Emília & Rosa, Tiago & Silva, Jorge, 2018. "Global decision support for airport performance and efficiency assessment," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 220-242.
    7. Thun, Jörn-Henrik, 2008. "Empirical analysis of manufacturing strategy implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 370-382, May.
    8. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico, 2019. "The Role of Sustainability Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in Implementing Sustainable Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    9. MacDiarmid, J. & Tholana, T. & Musingwini, C., 2018. "Analysis of key value drivers for major mining companies for the period 2006–2015," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 16-30.
    10. Vogel, Hans-Arthur & Graham, Anne, 2013. "Devising airport groupings for financial benchmarking," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 32-38.
    11. Ningxuan Kang & Cong Zhao & Jingshan Li & John A. Horst, 2016. "A Hierarchical structure of key performance indicators for operation management and continuous improvement in production systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 6333-6350, November.
    12. Tzouvanas, Panagiotis & Kizys, Renatas & Chatziantoniou, Ioannis & Sagitova, Roza, 2020. "Environmental and financial performance in the European manufacturing sector: An analysis of extreme tail dependency," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    13. Huiming Liu & Su Wu & Chongwen Zhong & Ying Liu, 2020. "The Sustainable Effect of Operational Performance on Financial Benefits: Evidence from Chinese Quality Awards Winners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Karasakal, Esra & Aker, Pınar, 2017. "A multicriteria sorting approach based on data envelopment analysis for R&D project selection problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 79-92.
    15. Chiuhsiang Joe Lin & Tariku Tamiru Belis & Tsai Chi Kuo, 2019. "Ergonomics-Based Factors or Criteria for the Evaluation of Sustainable Product Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Antonio K. W. Lau & Stacy H. N. Lee & Sojin Jung, 2018. "The Role of the Institutional Environment in the Relationship between CSR and Operational Performance: An Empirical Study in Korean Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    17. Bassam Buhusayen & Pi-Shen Seet & Alan Coetzer, 2021. "Front-Line Management during Radical Organisational Change: Social Exchange and Paradox Interpretations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    18. Arana-Solares, Iván Andrés & Ortega-Jiménez, César H. & Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela & Pérez-Díez de los Ríos, José Luis, 2019. "Contextual factors intervening in the manufacturing strategy and technology management-performance relationship," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 81-95.
    19. Seong-Nam Nam & Thao Thi Nguyen & Jeill Oh, 2019. "Performance Indicators Framework for Assessment of a Sanitary Sewer System Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Amoako-Gyampah, Kwasi & Acquaah, Moses, 2008. "Manufacturing strategy, competitive strategy and firm performance: An empirical study in a developing economy environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 575-592, February.
    21. M. Ishaq Bhatti & H. Awan & Z. Razaq, 2014. "The key performance indicators (KPIs) and their impact on overall organizational performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3127-3143, November.
    22. Macharis, Cathy & Springael, Johan & De Brucker, Klaas & Verbeke, Alain, 2004. "PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 307-317, March.
    23. Huang, Chi-Cheng & Chu, Pin-Yu & Chiang, Yu-Hsiu, 2008. "A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1038-1052, December.
    24. Colla, Martin & Ioannou, Anastasia & Falcone, Gioia, 2020. "Critical review of competitiveness indicators for energy projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    25. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    26. Erol, Ismail & Sencer, Safiye & Sari, Ramazan, 2011. "A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1088-1100, April.
    27. Xinhua Mao & Jiahua Gan & Xilong Zhao, 2019. "Debt Risk Evaluation of Toll Freeways in Mainland China Using the Grey Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Snežana Nestić & Ranka Gojković & Tijana Petrović & Danijela Tadić & Predrag Mimović, 2022. "Quality Performance Indicators Evaluation and Ranking by Using TOPSIS with the Interval-Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in Project-Oriented Manufacturing Companies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Favi, Claudio & Marconi, Marco & Mandolini, Marco & Germani, Michele, 2022. "Sustainable life cycle and energy management of discrete manufacturing plants in the industry 4.0 framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    2. Snežana Nestić & Ranka Gojković & Tijana Petrović & Danijela Tadić & Predrag Mimović, 2022. "Quality Performance Indicators Evaluation and Ranking by Using TOPSIS with the Interval-Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in Project-Oriented Manufacturing Companies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Rafael Lizarralde & Jaione Ganzarain & Mikel Zubizarreta, 2020. "Assessment and Selection of Technologies for the Sustainable Development of an R&D Center," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Kim, Sang-Chul & Shin, Hyun-Ik & Ahn, Jonghoon, 2020. "Energy performance analysis of airport terminal buildings by use of architectural, operational information and benchmark metrics," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Owain Simpson & Mark Elliott & Catherine Muller & Tim Jones & Phillippa Hentsch & Daniel Rooney & Nicole Cowell & William J. Bloss & Suzanne E. Bartington, 2022. "Evaluating Actions to Improve Air Quality at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-42, September.
    6. Michail Nerantzidis, 2018. "The role of weighting in corporate governance ratings," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(3), pages 589-628, September.
    7. Pedro Teixeira & Arnaldo Coelho & Pedro Fontoura & José Carlos Sá & Francisco J. G. Silva & Gilberto Santos & Luis P. Ferreira, 2022. "Combining lean and green practices to achieve a superior performance: The contribution for a sustainable development and competitiveness—An empirical study on the Portuguese context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 887-903, July.
    8. Oriana Helena Negulescu & Anca Draghici & Gabriela Fistis, 2022. "A Proposed Approach to Monitor and Control Sustainable Development Strategy Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    9. PrasannaVenkatesan, S. & Goh, M., 2016. "Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 124-142.
    10. Fontana, Veronika & Ebner, Manuel & Schirpke, Uta & Ohndorf, Markus & Pritsch, Hanna & Tappeiner, Ulrike & Kurmayer, Rainer, 2023. "An integrative approach to evaluate ecosystem services of mountain lakes using multi-criteria decision analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    11. Chiuhsiang Joe Lin & Tariku Tamiru Belis & Dino Caesaron & Bernard C. Jiang & Tsai Chi Kuo, 2020. "Development of Sustainability Indicators for Employee-Activity Based Production Process Using Fuzzy Delphi Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-31, August.
    12. Kubińska, Elżbieta & Adamczyk-Kowalczuk, Magdalena & Andrzejewski, Mariusz & Rozakis, Stelios, 2022. "Incorporating the status quo effect into the decision making process: The case of municipal companies merger," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Unutmaz Durmuşoğlu, Zeynep Didem, 2018. "Assessment of techno-entrepreneurship projects by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-46.
    14. Jarosław Wątróbski & Ewa Ziemba & Artur Karczmarczyk & Jarosław Jankowski, 2018. "An Index to Measure the Sustainable Information Society: The Polish Households Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-30, September.
    15. Yasir Ahmad & Danial Saeed Pirzada, 2014. "Using Analytic Hierarchy Process for Exploring Prioritization of Functional Strategies in Auto Parts Manufacturing SMEs of Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, November.
    16. Huiming Liu & Su Wu & Chongwen Zhong & Ying Liu, 2020. "The Sustainable Effect of Operational Performance on Financial Benefits: Evidence from Chinese Quality Awards Winners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, March.
    17. Garrido-Vega, Pedro & Ortega Jimenez, Cesar H. & de los Ríos, José Luis Díez Pérez & Morita, Michiya, 2015. "Implementation of technology and production strategy practices: Relationship levels in different industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 201-216.
    18. Wu, Cheng-Ru & Lin, Chin-Tsai & Tsai, Pei-Hsuan, 2010. "Evaluating business performance of wealth management banks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 971-979, December.
    19. Amel Ennaceur & Zied Elouedi & Eric Lefevre, 2016. "Belief AHP Method — AHP Method with the Belief Function Framework," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 553-573, May.
    20. Arana-Solares, Iván Andrés & Ortega-Jiménez, César H. & Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela & Pérez-Díez de los Ríos, José Luis, 2019. "Contextual factors intervening in the manufacturing strategy and technology management-performance relationship," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 81-95.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3498-:d:521658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.