IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v8y2018i1p11-d131556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age, Period, and Cohort Differences in Work Centrality and Work Values

Author

Listed:
  • Gábor Hajdu

    (Institute for Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1097 Budapest, Hungary
    MTA-ELTE Peripato Comparative Social Dynamics Research Group, 1112 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Endre Sik

    (TÁRKI Social Research Institute, 1112 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze whether work values differ between three dimensions of time (age, birth cohort, period). Using data of five waves of the World Values Survey and the European Values Study from more than forty countries and hierarchical age-period-cohort regression models, we did not find relevant gaps between birth cohorts with respect to the relative importance of work or with respect to work values. Thus, we claim that, in European and Euro-Atlantic countries, birth cohorts, on average, do not differ significantly with regard to their work values. Our results suggest, however, that the relative importance of work is significantly higher in the middle-age groups than among the younger or older groups. Regarding work values, we found that the importance of having an interesting job, good pay, and good hours decreases with age, and that job security is equally important at every age, whereas the importance of having a useful job increases with age.

Suggested Citation

  • Gábor Hajdu & Endre Sik, 2018. "Age, Period, and Cohort Differences in Work Centrality and Work Values," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-33, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:11-:d:131556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/8/1/11/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/8/1/11/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reither, Eric N. & Masters, Ryan K. & Yang, Yang Claire & Powers, Daniel A. & Zheng, Hui & Land, Kenneth C., 2015. "Should age-period-cohort studies return to the methodologies of the 1970s?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 356-365.
    2. Den Dulk, Laura & Groeneveld, Sandra & Ollier-Malaterre, Ariane & Valcour, Monique, 2013. "National context in work-life research: A multi-level cross-national analysis of the adoption of workplace work-life arrangements in Europe," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 478-494.
    3. Andrew Bell & Kelvyn Jones, 2014. "Another 'futile quest'? A simulation study of Yang and Land's Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort model," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 30(11), pages 333-360.
    4. Carolyn P. Egri & David A. Ralston, 2004. "Generation Cohorts and Personal Values: A Comparison of China and the United States," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 210-220, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mª Ángeles Hernández-Prados & José Santiago Álvarez-Muñoz, 2023. "Family Leisure in Rural and Urban Environments: A Question of Context," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean M. Twenge & Ryne A. Sherman & Julie J. Exline & Joshua B. Grubbs, 2016. "Declines in American Adults’ Religious Participation and Beliefs, 1972-2014," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440166, March.
    2. Gustavo De Santis & Massimo Mucciardi, 2017. "From Euclidean distances to APC models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 829-846, March.
    3. Liliya Leopold & Thomas Leopold, 2016. "Education and Health across Lives and Cohorts: A Study of Cumulative Advantage in Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 835, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    4. Shen-Tsu Wang, 2016. "Analysis of Life Context of On-Line Group-Buying Population by Dynamic Decision," Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 3(3), pages 173-181.
    5. Suzan Lewis & Deirdre Anderson & Clare Lyonette & Nicola Payne & Stephen Wood, 2017. "Public sector austerity cuts in Britain and the changing discourse of work–life balance," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(4), pages 586-604, August.
    6. Louise C Hawkley & Yuanyuan Gu & Yue-Jia Luo & John T Cacioppo, 2012. "The Mental Representation of Social Connections: Generalizability Extended to Beijing Adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Talavera, Oleksandr & Yin, Shuxing & Zhang, Mao, 2021. "Tournament incentives, age diversity and firm performance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 139-162.
    8. Ariane Pailhé & Anne Solaz, 2019. "Is there a wage cost for employees in family‐friendly workplaces? The effect of different employer policies," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 688-721, June.
    9. Lei Wang & Heikki Juslin, 2011. "The effects of value on the perception of corporate social responsibility implementation: A study of Chinese youth," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 246-262, July.
    10. Anli Jiang & Zhengxu Wang & Tony Huiquan Zhang, 2022. "Radicalizing and Conservatizing: Ageing Effects on Political Trust in Asia, 2001–2016," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 665-681, July.
    11. Ryan K. Masters & Daniel A. Powers & Robert A. Hummer & Audrey Beck & Shih-Fan Lin & Brian Karl Finch, 2016. "Fitting Age-Period-Cohort Models Using the Intrinsic Estimator: Assumptions and Misapplications," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(4), pages 1253-1259, August.
    12. Maarten J. Bijlsma & Rhian M. Daniel & Fanny Janssen & Bianca L. De Stavola, 2017. "An Assessment and Extension of the Mechanism-Based Approach to the Identification of Age-Period-Cohort Models," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(2), pages 721-743, April.
    13. Jianfang Liang & Jingjun Li & Xuerong Cao & Zejun Zhang, 2024. "Generational Differences in Sustainable Consumption Behavior among Chinese Residents: Implications Based on Perceptions of Sustainable Consumption and Lifestyle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Dongyu Chen & Xiaolin Li & Fujun Lai, 2023. "Shill bidding in lenders’ eyes? A cross-country study on the influence of large bids in online P2P lending," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1089-1114, June.
    15. Talavera, Oleksandr & Yin, Shuxing & Zhang, Mao, 2016. "Managing the diversity: board age diversity, directors’ personal values, and bank performance," MPRA Paper 71927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Tanja van der Lippe & Laura den Dulk & Katia Begall, 2024. "Flextime/Flexspace for All in the Organization? A Study of the Availability, Use, and Consequences of Flexible Work Arrangements for Low and High SES Employees in Nine European Countries," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Thomson, Rachel M. & Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, 2018. "Mental health and the jilted generation: Using age-period-cohort analysis to assess differential trends in young people's mental health following the Great Recession and austerity in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 133-143.
    18. van Hoorn, A.A.J., 2013. "Generational shifts in managerial values and the coming of a global business culture," Research Report 13012-GEM, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    19. Rupietta, Kira, 2015. "How does Part-time Work Affect Firm Performance and Innovation Activity?," Working papers 2015/05, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    20. Sharizan Sharkawi & Syed Syed Mohamad & Rosmimah Roslin, 2016. "Exploring the Leadership Preference of Malaysian Generation Y Employees: A Conceptual Paper," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 152-152, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:11-:d:131556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.