IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i1p6-d1559787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Gerlich

    (Center for Strategic Corporate Foresight and Sustainability, SBS Swiss Business School, 8302 Kloten-Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) tools has transformed numerous aspects of daily life, yet its impact on critical thinking remains underexplored. This study investigates the relationship between AI tool usage and critical thinking skills, focusing on cognitive offloading as a mediating factor. Utilising a mixed-method approach, we conducted surveys and in-depth interviews with 666 participants across diverse age groups and educational backgrounds. Quantitative data were analysed using ANOVA and correlation analysis, while qualitative insights were obtained through thematic analysis of interview transcripts. The findings revealed a significant negative correlation between frequent AI tool usage and critical thinking abilities, mediated by increased cognitive offloading. Younger participants exhibited higher dependence on AI tools and lower critical thinking scores compared to older participants. Furthermore, higher educational attainment was associated with better critical thinking skills, regardless of AI usage. These results highlight the potential cognitive costs of AI tool reliance, emphasising the need for educational strategies that promote critical engagement with AI technologies. This study contributes to the growing discourse on AI’s cognitive implications, offering practical recommendations for mitigating its adverse effects on critical thinking. The findings underscore the importance of fostering critical thinking in an AI-driven world, making this research essential reading for educators, policymakers, and technologists.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Gerlich, 2025. "AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:6-:d:1559787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/6/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/6/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Gerlich, 2023. "The Power of Virtual Influencers: Impact on Consumer Behaviour and Attitudes in the Age of AI," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Michael Gerlich, 2024. "Exploring Motivators for Trust in the Dichotomy of Human—AI Trust Dynamics," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Lisa Tsui, 2002. "Fostering Critical Thinking through Effective Pedagogy," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(6), pages 740-763, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Inhwa & Ki, Chung-Wha & Lee, Hyunhwan & Kim, Youn-Kyung, 2024. "Virtual influencer marketing: Evaluating the influence of virtual influencers’ form realism and behavioral realism on consumer ambivalence and marketing performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Marie Evens & An Verburgh & Jan Elen, 2013. "Critical Thinking in College Freshmen: The Impact of Secondary and Higher Education," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(3), pages 139-139, August.
    3. Siti Mujanah & Tri Ratnawati & Sumiati Sumiati & Rohani Mohd & Nor Intan Adha Hafid, 2023. "Analysis of critical thinking: potential variable differences between Malaysia and Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 43(1), pages 160-172, May.
    4. Nuno Ligeiro & Ivo Dias & Ana Moreira, 2024. "Recruitment and Selection Process Using Artificial Intelligence: How Do Candidates React?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Schendel, Rebecca, 2015. "Critical thinking at Rwanda's public universities: Emerging evidence of a crucial development priority," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 96-105.
    6. D. Hallas & J. B. Fernandez & N. G. Herman & A. Moursi, 2015. "Identification of Pediatric Oral Health Core Competencies through Interprofessional Education and Practice," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-7, January.
    7. Preeti Jaiswal, 2019. "Using Constructive Alignment to Foster Teaching Learning Processes," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 1-10, June.
    8. Yan, Ji & Xia, Senmao & Jiang, Amanda & Lin, Zhibin, 2024. "The effect of different types of virtual influencers on consumers’ emotional attachment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    9. Wisam Chaleila & Iman Garra-Alloush, 2019. "The Most Frequent Errors in Academic Writing: A Case of EFL Undergraduate Arab Students in Israel," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(7), pages 120-120, July.
    10. Franke, Claudia & Groeppel-Klein, Andrea, 2024. "The role of psychological distance and construal level in explaining the effectiveness of human-like vs. cartoon-like virtual influencers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    11. Deng, Fengyi & Tuo, Muyuan & Chen, Si & Zhang, Zichen, 2024. "Born for marketing? The effects of virtual versus human influencers on brand endorsement effectiveness: The role of advertising recognition," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:6-:d:1559787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.