IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i5p64-d351362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Pressures to Produce on Knowledge Production and Evaluation in the Modern Academy

Author

Listed:
  • Brandy Simula

    (Department of Sociology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Tracy Scott

    (Department of Sociology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

Abstract

Combining work from the related but distinct fields of sociology of knowledge and sociology of education, we explore the effects of the changing landscape of higher education on the academic knowledge production system. Drawing on 100 interviews with faculty members from 34 disciplines at an elite private research university, we show that faculty members perceive exponentially increasing pressures to produce, and identify the ways that those pressures can negatively impact the knowledge creation process. We then examine the ways those pressures to produce influence how faculty evaluate their colleagues’ work, leading faculty to extend the benefit of the doubt, rely on reputation, and emphasize the peer review process, even as they simultaneously critique its weaknesses. Finally, we show that faculty members ultimately reconcile their perceptions of weaknesses in the current knowledge production system with their belief in that system by emphasizing their own and their colleagues’ commitment to resisting structural pressures to produce. While much of the existing body of scholarship on the changing higher education landscape has focused on teaching and learning outcomes, this study contributes to our understanding of how those changes impact the research process, underscoring the relationship between institutional structures and evaluative processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Brandy Simula & Tracy Scott, 2020. "The Impact of Pressures to Produce on Knowledge Production and Evaluation in the Modern Academy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:64-:d:351362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/64/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/64/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carole J. Bland & Bruce A. Center & Deborah A. Finstad & Kelly R. Risbey & Justin Staples, 2006. "The Impact of Appointment Type on the Productivity and Commitment of Full-Time Faculty in Research and Doctoral Institutions," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(1), pages 89-123, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tommaso Agasisti & Giuseppe Munda, 2017. "Efficiency of investment in compulsory education: An Overview of Methodological Approaches," JRC Research Reports JRC106681, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Catherine P. Slade & Saundra J. Ribando & C. Kevin Fortner, 2016. "Faculty research following merger: a job stress and social identity theory perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(1), pages 71-89, April.
    3. Peter van den Besselaar & Ulf Sandström, 2016. "Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 143-162, January.
    4. Jianxiu Gu, 2024. "Insufficient Academic Experience or Excessive Family Responsibility: Why do Female Faculty in Chinese Research Universities Publish Less than Male Faculty?," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 65(6), pages 1340-1366, September.
    5. Randall G. Bowden & Lynn Gonzalez, 2012. "Faculty Appointments and Scholarly Activity: A Changing of the Guard?," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(2), pages 166-166, November.
    6. Tommaso Agasisti & Ralph Hippe & Giuseppe Munda, 2017. "Efficiency of investment in compulsory education: empirical analyses in Europe," JRC Research Reports JRC106678, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Pleun Arensbergen & Inge van der Weijden & Peter Besselaar, 2012. "Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 857-868, December.
    8. Catherine D. Rawn & Joanne A. Fox, 2018. "Understanding the Work and Perceptions of Teaching Focused Faculty in a Changing Academic Landscape," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(5), pages 591-622, August.
    9. Saira Irfan & Najib Ahmad Marzuki, 2018. "The Moderating Effects of Organizational Culture on the Relationship between Work Motivation and Work Commitment of University Academic Staff," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(1), pages 137-155, March.
    10. Jane W. Loeb, 2006. "The Status of Female Faculty in the U.S.: Thirty-five Years with Equal Opportunity Legislation," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 17(2), pages 157-180.
    11. Wullum Nielsen, Mathias & Börjeson, Love, 2019. "Gender diversity in the management field: Does it matter for research outcomes?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1617-1632.
    12. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Luca Secondi, 2017. "The determinants of research performance in European universities: a large scale multilevel analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1147-1178, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:64-:d:351362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.