IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i8p433-d1461002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Nuclear to Diverse: Shifting Conceptualisations of Marriage among Australia’s 1960s Generation—A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew James Phillips

    (Discipline of Psychology, School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

Abstract

In contemporary times, the conceptualisation of marriage has shifted; however, societal attitudes and cultural ideologies regarding its construction remain complex. As such, unique generational perspectives are needed to reflect on how marriage has evolved and to comment on ongoing tensions related to it. This study explores how individuals born in the 1960s conceptualise marriage, examining the complex interplay between traditional values and evolving perspectives. Using an exploratory qualitative design underpinned by a social constructionist epistemology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 participants (7 female, 5 male) aged 56–65. Reflexive thematic analysis revealed three main themes: (1) Unveiling the New Vows: The Shifting Values of Marriage and Family, (2) Breaking Boundaries and Transforming Traditions: Debunking Heteronormativity, and (3) Witnessing Progression: Dismantling Barriers and Embracing Diversity and Equality in Marriage. The findings indicate a significant shift in how marriage is viewed, with participants demonstrating both nostalgia for traditional constructs and support for more inclusive definitions. Notably, many participants positioned themselves as more progressive than their peers, challenging notions of homogenous generational attitudes. This study highlights the ongoing tension between traditional and contemporary views of marriage, suggesting that efforts to promote inclusivity must address both legal barriers and deeply ingrained cultural norms. These findings contribute to our understanding of how social institutions like marriage are reconceptualised over time, emphasising the dynamic nature of social change and the capacity for individuals to evolve in their perspectives on deeply entrenched societal norms.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew James Phillips, 2024. "From Nuclear to Diverse: Shifting Conceptualisations of Marriage among Australia’s 1960s Generation—A Qualitative Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:433-:d:1461002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/8/433/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/8/433/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon Carmichael, 1987. "Bust after boom: First marriage trends in Australia," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 24(2), pages 245-264, May.
    2. Mohd Aliff Abdul Majid & Mohhidin Othman & Siti Fatimah Mohamad & Sarina Abdul Halim Lim & Aziz Yusof, 2017. "Piloting for Interviews in Qualitative Research: Operationalization and Lessons Learnt," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 1073-1080, April.
    3. Arun S. Hendi, 2019. "Proximate Sources of Change in Trajectories of First Marriage in the United States, 1960–2010," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(3), pages 835-862, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirsty Mollie Way & Jessica Elizabeth Bourne & Miranda Elaine Glynis Armstrong, 2023. "“I’m Hooked on e-cycling, I Can Finally Be Active Again”: Perceptions of e-cycling as a Physical Activity Intervention during Breast Cancer Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Jeadran Malagón-Rojas & Eliana L. Parra B & Marcela Mercado, 2020. "Infection and Risk Perception of SARS-CoV-2 among Airport Workers: A Mixed Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-17, December.
    3. M. A. A. Majid* & S. F. Mohamad & S. A. H. Lim & M. Othman, 2018. "Piloting for the Multidimensional Job Satisfaction Instrument in the Offshore Work Setting," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 37-44:6.
    4. María Leonor Conejeros-Solar & María Paz Gómez-Arizaga & Robin M. Schader & Susan M. Baum & Katia Sandoval-Rodríguez & Sandra Catalán Henríquez, 2021. "The Other Side of the Coin: Perceptions of Twice-Exceptional Students by Their Close Friends," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    5. Kazi Ziaul Zafri & Tippawan Lertatthakornkit & Sarana Photchanachan & Tao Zhu & Walton Wider, 2024. "Weathering the Inflationary Storm 2021-2022: Crisis Management Modalities for the Informal Microenterprise Sector," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 47-61, September.
    6. Kim McErlean, 2021. "The growth of education differentials in marital dissolution in the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(26), pages 841-856.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:433-:d:1461002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.