IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v14y2025i2p31-d1591346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy, Exergy, and Exergo-Sustainability Analysis of a Brayton S-CO 2 /Kalina Operating in Araçuaí, Brazil, Using Solar Energy as a Thermal Source

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Córdoba

    (Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad del Atlántico, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia)

  • Guillermo Valencia

    (Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad del Atlántico, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia)

  • Branda Molina

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, Universidad del Atlántico, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia)

Abstract

Climate change and increasing energy demand drive the search for sustainable alternatives for power generation. In this study, an energy, exergy, and exergy-sustainability analysis was performed on a supercritical CO 2 Brayton cycle with intercooling and reheating, coupled to a Kalina cycle for waste heat recovery, using solar energy as a thermal source in Araçuaí, Minas Gerais, Brazil, a city that holds the historical record for the highest temperature recorded in Brazilian territory. The results show that at 900 °C the maximum values of thermal efficiency (56.67%), net power (186.55 kW), and destroyed exergy (621.62 kW) were reached, while the maximum exergy efficiency, 24.92%, was achieved at 700 °C. At a turbine inlet pressure of 18 MPa, the maximum thermal (54.48%) and exergy (24.50%) efficiencies were obtained. Likewise, working with a compressor efficiency of 95%, a thermal efficiency of 54.98%, a net power of 165.84 kW, and an exergy efficiency of 24.62% was achieved, reducing the exergy destroyed to 504.95 kW. The solar field presented the highest rate of irreversibilities (~62.2%). Finally, the exergy-sustainability analysis identified 700 °C as the outstanding operating temperature. This research highlights the technical feasibility of operating Brayton S-CO 2 combined cycles with concentrated solar power (CSP) systems in regions of high solar irradiation, evidencing the potential of CSP systems to generate renewable energy efficiently and sustainably under extreme solar conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Córdoba & Guillermo Valencia & Branda Molina, 2025. "Energy, Exergy, and Exergo-Sustainability Analysis of a Brayton S-CO 2 /Kalina Operating in Araçuaí, Brazil, Using Solar Energy as a Thermal Source," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:31-:d:1591346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/2/31/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/2/31/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Meng-Jie & Li, Ming-Jia & Jiang, Rui & Du, Shen & Li, Xiao-Yue, 2024. "Study on the dynamic characteristics of a concentrated solar power plant with the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle coupled with different thermal energy storage methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    2. Jerry L. Holechek & Hatim M. E. Geli & Mohammed N. Sawalhah & Raul Valdez, 2022. "A Global Assessment: Can Renewable Energy Replace Fossil Fuels by 2050?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Ferraz de Andrade Santos, José Alexandre & de Jong, Pieter & Alves da Costa, Caiuby & Torres, Ednildo Andrade, 2020. "Combining wind and solar energy sources: Potential for hybrid power generation in Brazil," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Yari, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, M.A., 2015. "Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 712-722.
    5. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Benito, Regano & Stein, Wes, 2015. "Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 348-365.
    6. Zhang, Dong & Zhang, Haochun & Luo, Ying & Zhao, Shuting, 2024. "Comparative and optimal study of energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic performance in supercritical CO2 recompression combined cycles with organic rankine, trans-critical CO2, and kalina cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    7. Xiao, Tingyu & Liu, Chao & Wang, Xurong & Wang, Shukun & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Li, Qibin & Li, Xiaoxiao, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of the solar thermal power plant integrated with air-cooled supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 119-133.
    8. S. Mohammad S. Mahmoudi & Ata D. Akbari & Marc A. Rosen, 2016. "Thermoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a New Combined Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Recompression Brayton/Kalina Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Meriño Stand, L. & Valencia Ochoa, G. & Duarte Forero, J., 2021. "Energy and exergy assessment of a combined supercritical Brayton cycle-orc hybrid system using solar radiation and coconut shell biomass as energy source," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 119-142.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    2. Liao, Gaoliang & E, Jiaqiang & Zhang, Feng & Chen, Jingwei & Leng, Erwei, 2020. "Advanced exergy analysis for Organic Rankine Cycle-based layout to recover waste heat of flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Guo, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Design analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide recuperator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 21-27.
    5. Sedighi, Mohammadreza & Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Alamdari, Pedram & Lake, Maree & Rose, Andrew & Izadgoshasb, Iman & Taylor, Robert A., 2020. "A novel high-temperature (>700 °C), volumetric receiver with a packed bed of transparent and absorbing spheres," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Bracken, Cameron & Voisin, Nathalie & Burleyson, Casey D. & Campbell, Allison M. & Hou, Z. Jason & Broman, Daniel, 2024. "Standardized benchmark of historical compound wind and solar energy droughts across the Continental United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    7. Xiao, Gang & Zheng, Guanghua & Ni, Dong & Li, Qiang & Qiu, Min & Ni, Mingjiang, 2018. "Thermodynamic assessment of solar photon-enhanced thermionic conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 134-145.
    8. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    9. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Xuwei & Qiao, Yongqiang & Zhang, Chun & Gao, Wei & Yao, Mingyu, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2–SF6 mixture working fluid supercritical Brayton cycle used for solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    10. Yu, Xiaoli & Li, Zhi & Lu, Yiji & Huang, Rui & Roskilly, Anthony Paul, 2019. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycle integrated with double latent thermal energy storage for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1098-1112.
    11. Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Akbari Kordlar, M., 2018. "A new flexible geothermal based cogeneration system producing power and refrigeration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 499-512.
    12. Das, Mainak & Reddy, K.S., 2025. "Modelling and optimization of combined supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle and organic Rankine cycle for electricity and hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
    13. Ramesh Chitharaj & Hariprasad Perumal & Mohammed Almeshaal & P. Manoj Kumar, 2025. "Optimizing Performance of a Solar Flat Plate Collector for Sustainable Operation Using Box–Behnken Design (BBD)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Evgeny Chupakhin & Olga Babich & Stanislav Sukhikh & Svetlana Ivanova & Ekaterina Budenkova & Olga Kalashnikova & Alexander Prosekov & Olga Kriger & Vyacheslav Dolganyuk, 2022. "Bioengineering and Molecular Biology of Miscanthus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Dzido, Aleksandra & Wołowicz, Marcin & Krawczyk, Piotr, 2022. "Transcritical carbon dioxide cycle as a way to improve the efficiency of a Liquid Air Energy Storage system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1385-1391.
    16. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    17. Cheng, Kunlin & Qin, Jiang & Zhang, Duo & Bao, Wen & Jing, Wuxing, 2022. "Performance evaluation for a combined power generation system of closed-Brayton-cycle and thermoelectric generator with finite cold source at room temperature on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    18. Yıldız Koç, 2019. "Parametric Optimisation of an ORC in a Wood Chipboard Production Facility to Recover Waste Heat Produced from the Drying and Steam Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Yu, Haoshui & Eason, John & Biegler, Lorenz T. & Feng, Xiao, 2017. "Simultaneous heat integration and techno-economic optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for multiple waste heat stream recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 322-333.
    20. Son, Seongmin & Jeong, Yongju & Cho, Seong Kuk & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2020. "Development of supercritical CO2 turbomachinery off-design model using 1D mean-line method and Deep Neural Network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:31-:d:1591346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.