IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v311y2024ics0360544224031232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative and optimal study of energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic performance in supercritical CO2 recompression combined cycles with organic rankine, trans-critical CO2, and kalina cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Dong
  • Zhang, Haochun
  • Luo, Ying
  • Zhao, Shuting

Abstract

The bottom cycle in supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) recompression Brayton combined cycle (RCBC) effectively recovers substantial waste heat for electricity generation, enhancing energy utilization. The recovery efficiency is significantly influenced by the bottom cycle configurations and specific working conditions. Besides, implementing these bottom cycles introduces challenges related to increased system dimensions and design complexity. The present study aims to understand and evaluate the characteristics and optimal trade-offs of various bottom cycles, including trans-critical, subcritical, and non-azeotropic mixed working fluids, by establishing 3E (energy, exergy and Exergoeconomic) models for sCO2/tCO2, sCO2/ORC, and sCO2/KC combined cycle systems. To analysis and enhance interpretability, statistical Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) alongside unsupervised learning-based Self-Organizing Map (SOM) techniques and parametric analysis are employed. These methods identify key parameters and discern system patterns. Subsequently, the Non-Dominated Sorting Whale Optimization Algorithm (NSWOA) and entropy weight-based Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are applied to establish a Pareto-optimal decision space and identify compromised ideal design points for each combined cycle. The results quantitatively rank sensitivity for objective variables within the design space in different combined cycles and visually represent system nonlinearity and coupling relationships in 2D weight planes using SOM. The TOPSIS trade-off points based on the Pareto frontier for the three combined cycles are ηth = 45.08 %, cp,tot = 8.5199 $/GJ, ηth = 45.13 %, cp,tot = 8.3739 $/GJ, and ηth = 48.97 %, cp,tot = 8.4783 $/GJ, respectively. Integrating machine learning techniques provides a comprehensive understanding of system patterns, offering valuable insights for decision-makers in the design and optimization of combined cogeneration cycles.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Dong & Zhang, Haochun & Luo, Ying & Zhao, Shuting, 2024. "Comparative and optimal study of energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic performance in supercritical CO2 recompression combined cycles with organic rankine, trans-critical CO2, and kalina cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:311:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224031232
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224031232
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fallah, M. & Mohammadi, Z. & Mahmoudi, S.M. Seyed, 2022. "Advanced exergy analysis of the combined S–CO2/ORC system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    3. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    4. Pang, Kuo-Cheng & Chen, Shih-Chi & Hung, Tzu-Chen & Feng, Yong-Qiang & Yang, Shih-Cheng & Wong, Kin-Wah & Lin, Jaw-Ren, 2017. "Experimental study on organic Rankine cycle utilizing R245fa, R123 and their mixtures to investigate the maximum power generation from low-grade heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 636-651.
    5. Penkuhn, Mathias & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Systematic evaluation of efficiency improvement options for sCO2 Brayton cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    6. Akbari, Ata D. & Mahmoudi, Seyed M.S., 2014. "Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 501-512.
    7. Shokri Kalan, Ali & Heidarabadi, Shadab & Khaleghi, Mohammad & Ghiasirad, Hamed & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna, 2023. "Biomass-to-energy integrated trigeneration system using supercritical CO2 and modified Kalina cycles: Energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    8. Fan, Gang & Lu, Xiaochen & Chen, Kang & Zhang, Yicen & Han, Zihao & Yu, Haibin & Dai, Yiping, 2022. "Comparative analysis on design and off-design performance of novel cascade CO2 combined cycles for gas turbine waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    9. Ding, Yang & Liu, Chao & Zhang, Cheng & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Li, Qibin & Mao, Lianfei, 2018. "Exergoenvironmental model of Organic Rankine Cycle system including the manufacture and leakage of working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 52-64.
    10. Sarkar, Jahar, 2009. "Second law analysis of supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1172-1178.
    11. Tang, Junrong & Li, Qibin & Wang, Shukun & Yu, Haoshui, 2023. "Thermo-economic optimization and comparative analysis of different organic flash cycles for the supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Córdoba & Guillermo Valencia & Branda Molina, 2025. "Energy, Exergy, and Exergo-Sustainability Analysis of a Brayton S-CO 2 /Kalina Operating in Araçuaí, Brazil, Using Solar Energy as a Thermal Source," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Gang & Lu, Xiaochen & Chen, Kang & Zhang, Yicen & Han, Zihao & Yu, Haibin & Dai, Yiping, 2022. "Comparative analysis on design and off-design performance of novel cascade CO2 combined cycles for gas turbine waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    2. Tang, Junrong & Li, Qibin & Wang, Shukun & Yu, Haoshui, 2023. "Thermo-economic optimization and comparative analysis of different organic flash cycles for the supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    3. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Zhang, Yuan & Liang, Tianyang & Yang, Ke, 2022. "An integrated energy storage system consisting of Compressed Carbon dioxide energy storage and Organic Rankine Cycle: Exergoeconomic evaluation and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    6. Fallah, M. & Mohammadi, Z. & Mahmoudi, S.M. Seyed, 2022. "Advanced exergy analysis of the combined S–CO2/ORC system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    7. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad & Rosen, Marc A., 2022. "Thermoeconomic analysis of two solid oxide fuel cell based cogeneration plants integrated with simple or modified supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Xinyu Miao & Haochun Zhang & Qi Wang & Wenbo Sun & Yan Xia, 2022. "Thermodynamic, Exergoeconomic and Multi-Objective Analyses of Supercritical N 2 O-He Recompression Brayton Cycle for a Nuclear Spacecraft Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-31, November.
    9. Du, Yadong & Yang, Ce & Zhao, Ben & Hu, Chenxing & Zhang, Hanzhi & Yu, Zhiyi & Gao, Jianbing & Zhao, Wei & Wang, Haimei, 2023. "Optimal design of a supercritical carbon dioxide recompression cycle using deep neural network and data mining techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    10. Fan, Gang & Li, Hang & Du, Yang & Zheng, Shaoxiong & Chen, Kang & Dai, Yiping, 2020. "Preliminary conceptual design and thermo-economic analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power system based on supercritical carbon dioxide cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    11. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & He, Ya-Ling & Xu, Jin-Liang, 2019. "A study of new method and comprehensive evaluation on the improved performance of solar power tower plant with the CO2-based mixture cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    12. Xu, Jinliang & Sun, Enhui & Li, Mingjia & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Bingguo, 2018. "Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 227-246.
    13. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    14. Miao, Xinyu & Zhang, Haochun & Ma, Fangwei & Deng, MingHao & You, Ersheng, 2024. "Thermodynamic, exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of S–N2O/t-N2O nuclear power cycle for the construction of the lunar base," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    15. Thanganadar, Dhinesh & Fornarelli, Francesco & Camporeale, Sergio & Asfand, Faisal & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2021. "Off-design and annual performance analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle with thermal storage for CSP application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    16. Wang, Xurong & Yang, Yi & Zheng, Ya & Dai, Yiping, 2017. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a supercritical CO2 cycle for a cogeneration application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 971-982.
    17. Ma, Yuegeng & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of main compression intercooling effects on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 746-756.
    18. Wang, Xiaohe & Liu, Qibin & Bai, Zhang & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO2 system with solar energy and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 108-118.
    19. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Yan, Jun-Jie & Wang, Kun, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance analysis of different supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures in the molten salt solar power tower systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 785-798.
    20. Wang, Shengpeng & Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Yao, Mingyu & Peng, Botao & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Thermohydrodynamic analysis of the vertical gas wall and reheat gas wall in a 300 MW supercritical CO2 boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:311:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224031232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.