IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i16p1851-d608884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Mindfulness Assessment and Its Impact on Rational Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Yuli L. León

    (School of Management, Del Rosario University, Calle 12C No 6-25, Bogotá D.C., Colombia)

  • Enrique Mu

    (School of Management, Carlow University, 3333 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA)

Abstract

Ever since its appearance in the organizational research literature, the importance of organizational mindfulness has consistently increased. For this reason, this study has the following two research objectives: first, to explore the positive effect of organizational mindfulness (OM) on the rationality of the decision-making process and second, to propose a framework to assess the extent of its presence in organizations. For the first objective, exploratory partial least square structure modeling (PLS-SEM) was conducted, while for the second goal, an evaluation framework based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was developed. Surveying 117 decision-making leaders in the field, organizational mindfulness and its constitutive processes that include resistance to simplify interpretations, preoccupation with failure, sensitivity of operations and commitment to resiliency with deference to expertise, were empirically studied. A significant positive effect of these dimensions and OM as a whole on the rationality of the decision-making process was statistically shown. For this reason, it is important to assess the extent of the presence of organizational mindfulness in organizations. The use of this AHP-based OM evaluation framework is demonstrated for the case of the complex health sector in Colombia.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuli L. León & Enrique Mu, 2021. "Organizational Mindfulness Assessment and Its Impact on Rational Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-29, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:16:p:1851-:d:608884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/16/1851/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/16/1851/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James W. Dean & Mark P. Sharfman, 1993. "Procedural Rationality In The Strategic Decision‐Making Process," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 587-610, July.
    2. Ndubisi, Nelson Oly, 2012. "Mindfulness, reliability, pre-emptive conflict handling, customer orientation and outcomes in Malaysia's healthcare sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 537-546.
    3. Said Elbanna & John Child, 2007. "The Influence of Decision, Environmental and Firm Characteristics on the Rationality of Strategic Decision‐Making," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 561-591, June.
    4. Sarstedt, Marko & Hair, Joseph F. & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Becker, Jan-Michael & Ringle, Christian M., 2019. "How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 197-211.
    5. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    6. Mu, Enrique & Carroll, James, 2016. "Development of a fraud risk decision model for prioritizing fraud risk cases in manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 30-42.
    7. Mu, Enrique & Chung, Tingting Rachel & Reed, Lawrence Ian, 2017. "Paradigm shift in criminal police lineups: Eyewitness identification as multicriteria decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 95-106.
    8. Necmi K. Avkiran & Christian M. Ringle (ed.), 2018. "Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-3-319-71691-6, July-Dece.
    9. Jill R. Hough & Margaret A. White, 2003. "Environmental dynamism and strategic decision‐making rationality: an examination at the decision level," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 481-489, May.
    10. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2012. "Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-4614-3597-6, July-Dece.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessio Ishizaka & Enrique Mu, 2023. "What is so special about the analytic hierarchy and network process?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 625-634, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ranjan Chaudhuri & Sheshadri Chatterjee & Demetris Vrontis & Sumana Chaudhuri, 2022. "Innovation in SMEs, AI Dynamism, and Sustainability: The Current Situation and Way Forward," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Lim, Xin-Jean & Ting, Hiram & Liu, Yide & Quach, Sara, 2022. "Are privacy concerns still relevant? Revisiting consumer behaviour in omnichannel retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Haarhaus, Tim & Liening, Andreas, 2020. "Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Zsuzsanna Katalin Szabo & Zsombor Szádoczki & Sándor Bozóki & Gabriela C. Stănciulescu & Dalma Szabo, 2021. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritisation of Strategic Objectives of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Haddad, M. & Sanders, D. & Tewkesbury, G., 2020. "Selecting a discrete multiple criteria decision making method for Boeing to rank four global market regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-15.
    6. Faraz Sadeghvaziri & Mohammad Azimi, 2022. "Employer brand identification: investigating the concept of employer brand identification in the military context," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 1-26, January.
    7. Scott C. Manley & Joseph F. Hair & Ralph I. Williams & William C. McDowell, 2021. "Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1805-1825, December.
    8. Muaz Azinuddin & Muhammad Burhanuddeen Mohammad Nasir & Mohd Hafiz Hanafiah & Nur Shahirah Mior Shariffuddin & Mohd Khairul Amri Kamarudin, 2022. "Interlinkage of Perceived Ecotourism Design Affordance, Perceived Value of Destination Experiences, Destination Reputation, and Loyalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Rabiah Na-Allah Shehu & Noor Hazlina Ahmad, 2023. "Entrepreneurship education and graduate’s venture creation activities: roles of entrepreneurial support and entrepreneurial capabilities," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Timo Tremml & Sabine Löbbe & Andreas Kuckertz, 2022. "Board behavior’s impact on entrepreneurial orientation in public enterprises," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(4), pages 1183-1211, December.
    11. Akbari, Negar & Irawan, Chandra A. & Jones, Dylan F. & Menachof, David, 2017. "A multi-criteria port suitability assessment for developments in the offshore wind industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PA), pages 118-133.
    12. Bijay Prasad Kushwaha & Atul Shiva & Vikas Tyagi, 2023. "How Investors’ Financial Well-being Influences Enterprises and Individual’s Psychological Fitness? Moderating Role of Experience under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Trujillo-Gallego, Mariana & Sarache, William & Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de, 2022. "Digital technologies and green human resource management: Capabilities for GSCM adoption and enhanced performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    14. Younès El Manzani & Mostapha El Idrissi & Zakaria Lissaneddine, 2022. "Soft quality management practices and product innovation ambidexterity: the mediating role of market orientation ambidexterity," Post-Print hal-04317941, HAL.
    15. Sarstedt, Marko & Radomir, Lăcrămioara & Moisescu, Ovidiu Ioan & Ringle, Christian M., 2022. "Latent class analysis in PLS-SEM: A review and recommendations for future applications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 398-407.
    16. Hussain, Matloub & Papastathopoulos, Avraam, 2022. "Organizational readiness for digital financial innovation and financial resilience," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    17. Faris A. AlFaraidy & Kishore Srinivasa Teegala & Gaurav Dwivedi, 2023. "Selection of a Sustainable Structural Floor System for an Office Building Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Csató, László & Petróczy, Dóra Gréta, 2021. "On the monotonicity of the eigenvector method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(1), pages 230-237.
    19. Scott C. Manley & Joseph F. Hair & Ralph I. Williams & William C. McDowell, 0. "Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    20. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:16:p:1851-:d:608884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.